109
submitted 10 months ago by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 81 points 10 months ago

Don't worry, they'll kill the project after naming it Chrome Recall, Google Recall, Google Watcher, GWatch (with chat), Chat&Watch, Google Watch (new) in the span of a year.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 26 points 10 months ago

They will have 7 identical services but 6 will not support feature X

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

Nah, they'll kill it after a year due to hard drive costs. Enough screenshots at a resolution high enough to know wtf you're looking at and still have vaguely usable data would be absurd.

I could see it rebranded for enterprise usage for businesses and schools though, at an extra cost.

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Windows: does something privacy invading bad

Google: why didn't I think of that? Hold my beer

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 30 points 10 months ago
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 31 points 10 months ago

I didn't think Linux was going to the the big thing but right now it is "winning" in the sense that it sucks the least.

[-] macattack@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I'm going to continue buying Chromebooks because I can wipe the OS and put Linux on them.

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 8 points 10 months ago

GrapheneOS logic lol

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

yep, easily the best netbooks are chromebooks without chrome.

i wish we’d see another pixelbook tho. my battery poofed and nothing on the market comes close.

[-] jlow@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago
[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Why the project have an Elon Musk xitter in the readme?

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 17 points 10 months ago

The fact Linux folk prefer to count their market share at 2% rather than be associated with Chrome OS should tell you how far it went off track.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 points 10 months ago

It is Linux but it really isn't Linux. It violates pretty much every philosophy of Linux

[-] Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works 28 points 10 months ago

I still don't understand who the fuck asked for such a feature.

[-] M500@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago

It was the advertisers and government.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago
[-] SoulKaribou@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

It's for your safety. Nothing will be collected without your consent. Obedience is freedom. Marry and reproduce.

[-] Midnight1938@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

People were encrypting too many things. Gotta give something to the hard working feds

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

It was trendy

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 18 points 10 months ago

I got as far as the second paragraph, which consists of the following quote from a Google VP:

“I’m not going to talk about Recall, but I think the reason that some people feel it’s creepy is when it doesn’t feel useful, and it doesn’t feel like something they initiated or that they get a clear benefit from it”

That's somehow worse than I imagined. I can at least understand being intentionally sinister, or overtly anti-privacy, but that level of delusion is somehow actually more terrifying.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 8 points 10 months ago

This is the company that couldn't understand why Google Glass failed so hard.

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I can imagine those guys arguing about "legitimate interests" because data that isn't monetised is worthless or something.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

I know we're all thinking it, but people paying attention feel that way because... it’s creepy, it's not useful, it's not something they initiated, and they don't get a clear benefit from it.

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 11 points 10 months ago

but I think the reason that some people feel it’s creepy is when it doesn’t feel useful, and it doesn’t feel like something they initiated or that they get a clear benefit from it”

Well, why do it then?

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 8 points 10 months ago

Can you like, not?

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

lol but MS just recalled Recall

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

No they just turned if off by default. They can change that will an update

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I know but that isn’t a snappy one-liner

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago

Yes it is

They can change your settings anytime.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Both users are angry.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 7 points 10 months ago

WTF Google, did you really feel that gemini was such a threat that you had to usurp its name?

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
109 points (97.4% liked)

Privacy

37371 readers
395 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS