311
Don't worry a mystery investor will come and put billions in Trump's pockets anytime now.
Again.
Probably all these shares being bought by Russians anyways.
I wouldn't say just Russians, but a 50% chance of owning shares in the next ruler of America for $31.16/ea is a deal for a lot of people.
Hmm, you’ve got me sold
[furiously logging into my Robin Hood account]
I thought Robin Hood took from the poor and gave to the rich.
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore he's not in this bit 🎶
I can hit it nine times out ten, that’s the point
Don’t forget the Saudis
They already gave 2 billion to Ivankas husband, they're good.
And for social networks, they financed Musk to get their hands on Twitter.
Why bother chopping up reporters (again) when they can just control the platform?
Don’t worry a mystery investor will come and put billions in Trump’s pockets anytime now.
Are you suggesting that there was actually no need to spend $8 billion to build a site comparable to lemmy?
Ya, the Ruble is falling against the dollar again, so of course this happens.
Roughly 3 months to go in this game of hot potato before Trump can sell his shares without special permission from the board.
He can probably get that permission by twisting arms.
The stock market is a voting machine not a weighing machine….
I’m amazed that any investor is buying for the long term. People buying are only propping up trump. There are no fundamentals it has only ever lost money.
So yeah some people speculate on it. Or to prop him up
Run Away!!!
Different take:
In other words, Buffett specialized in finding “undervalued” issues on the market. Such opportunities arise occasionally, he says, because in the short run the stock market acts like a “voting machine” (reflecting all kinds of irrational attitudes and expectations), while functioning in the long run more like a “weighing machine” (reflecting a firm’s true value).
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2020/01/09/market/?amp=1
Either way, DJT is a shorting opportunity.
TIL Trump's media is still in business. I'm surprised it lasted this long. I guess there's stupid people in every field.
There is no shortage of stupid people. Explains why a tool like donnie even had that ridiculous game show given to him, and also how he managed to win the Electoral College and slither into office.
There will always be stocks for gullible people. I remember when they IPO'd the national telecommunication company in my country. You were practically bombarded with ads from all sides to buy shares. My stance was that if they have to peddle the stock to the public that way, they probably did not find sufficient interest in professional circles for a reason.
The stock was then IPO'd at about €15 and shot up to over €100 in a few months. My coworker was quite thankful later that I frequently reminded him that the overall evaluation of the company only supported a value of about €10 per share. He sold at €100. It peaked at €102, and then fell down to €12 or €13. Over the last 30 years, it managed to slowly climb to €22 now, with no more significant peaks.
Blyat!
I keep checking about once per week. I saw this earlier today and felt pretty great about it. I feel bad for the rubes who lost their savings, but I can’t be responsible for their inability to spot a con.
I don't feel bad for them. They're supporting a rapist convicted felon and traitor.
Gosh, that's so sad.
So sad. Well, anyway. How's the evolution thing working out for ya? Seems pretty popular conceptually.
🤞🍿
It's soooo low! buy buy buy!
/s don't buy people.
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
311 points (98.7% liked)
politics
18883 readers
3521 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS