307
We've gone full circle - North Korea and South Korea wage a proxy war among western belligerents. Now if Seoul could just propose an end to hostilities along a particular meridian...
Quit "considering" and fucking do it.
God, quit dragging this thing out so that more families get slaughtered.
Spokesperson has to respond immediately. Paperwork and analysis people take a bit more time.
I get why, but I'm still a little surprised they haven't done it already.
Apart from who is north of their border, they're a small sea journey away from China, which is a major naval power. I think they were trying to avoid pissing off both.
It is illegal for S Korea to sell arms to anyone fighting in a war, a measure against war profiteering. That law will need to be changed in some way. That will not be easy, Korean culture is pretty conservative, very fond of the status quo. This is a strong incentive, however.
South Korean artillery shell production goes bbbrrrr.
Also a fine chance to get some battle testing on a battalion of K9's and maybe even a brigade of K2's.
Yo just offer to set up a joint production facility for the K2 on the Ukrainian/Polish border. The Poles already have an order for like 1000 of the things (no, not a typo). I’m sure South Korea would be very interested in rapidly iterating towards the K2A2 based on actual battlefield testing.
@gravitas_deficiency @MicroWave The contract for 1000 K2 is more of a letter of intent, and for now there is only a contract for 180 units (another 180 in the near future) - and that would probably be it, considering that Poland already has 360 Abrams tanks and over 200 Leopard 2's.
Talks over joint production are difficult, so K2PL seems unlikely. Koreans simply prefer to take the whole cake for themselves.
Ah yes Russia, please antagonise the country with one of the highest artillery shell stockpiles and production capacities in the world, what bad thing could result from that?
According to the text of the deal published by the North’s official Korean Central News Agency, if either country gets invaded and is pushed into a state of war, the other must deploy “all means at its disposal without delay” to provide “military and other assistance.” But the agreement also says that such actions must be in accordance with the laws of both countries and Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, which recognizes a U.N. member state’s right to self-defense.
This seems like the bigger point
Oh hell yes, it's about time.
"Consider"
It's not time yet, sadly.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The comments by a senior presidential official came hours after North Korea’s state media released the details of the agreement reached between its leader Kim Jong Un and Russian President Vladimir Putin during their summit on Wednesday in Pyongyang.
The presidential official, who spoke on condition of anonymity during a background briefing, according to office rules, said Seoul in response will reconsider the issue of providing arms to Ukraine to help the country fight off Russia’s invasion.
South Korea, a growing arms exporter with a well-equipped military backed by the United States, has provided humanitarian aid and other support to Ukraine while joining U.S.-led economic sanctions against Moscow.
KCNA said the agreements require the countries to take steps to prepare joint measures for the purpose of strengthening their defense capabilities to prevent war and protect regional and global peace and security.
Kim in recent months has made Russia his priority as he pushes a foreign policy aimed at expanding relations with countries confronting Washington, embracing the idea of a “new Cold War” and trying to display a united front in Putin’s broader conflicts with the West.
Tensions on the Korean Peninsula are at their highest point in years, with the pace of both Kim’s weapons tests and combined military exercises involving the U.S., South Korea and Japan intensifying in a tit-for-tat cycle.
The original article contains 1,035 words, the summary contains 222 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Seeing south korean self propelled artillery in Ukraine would warm my cold, mosquito infested Finnish heart.
What Finland should do, is "invade" Ukraine. And they take over all the areas that russia control. Take them in the name of Finland. So at this point, they are Finland occupied, but still part of Ukraine.
Now if Russia comes in, they risk engaging in battle with a Finland occupied territory.....a NATO territory.
Crimea might be a bit trickier......because it's no longer considered part of Ukraine.
But then after the war ends, Finland occupies all of Ukraine. But not in a threatening way. Just to make sure russia doesn't come back.
Now if Ukraine on their own want to take back Crimea, they can......but I can't see that being a NATO thing.
And why would Finland do any of this? Well........it's russia. Fuck em.
nice hearts of iron rp
Hell, they should churn out a few divisions of K2 MBTs for them too. I’m sure South Korea would be interested to see the results of some real-world battlefield testing.
I would have thought that one of the few benefits of living in a country that is that cold in the winter would spare you from mosquitoes. No wonder y'all are so pissy when Russia gets too big for their britches.
Yeah no mosquitoes in the winter.
We have a bit over hundred thousand lakes, a ton of ponds and swamps everywhere. So once the weather is warm enough, basically the whole country becomes a breeding pool for those little bastards.
Tämän vuoden hyttyset ovat ihan helvetin kauheita. 💀🦟
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
307 points (99.4% liked)
World News
39034 readers
1220 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS