211
submitted 4 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ThatsMrCharlieToYou@sh.itjust.works 65 points 4 months ago

I wholeheartedly agree with the end, I am sometimes at odds with the means but it can't be denied that these activists have some of the biggest balls on the planet and I have nothing but respect for them. The message is clear and consistent, garnering huge publicity for the cause is good. I know some people don't like it but you try getting a multi trillion pound industry to cease causing irreparable harm and you probably wouldn't make your local paper.

What should be remembered is that it shouldn't take this type of activism, but what is left when voices are ignored?

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

what is left when voices are ignored?

We aren't allowed to spell it out on social media sites, as moderators will remove such language. But we all know what needs to happen to make oppression stop. The problem just comes down to coordinating the efforts among the people willing to do the dirty work.

[-] Frokke@lemmings.world -2 points 4 months ago

Biggest balls? Really? They are actually a large part of why we're still so dependent on fossil fuels. If they had the balls to accept nuclear is in fact the faaaaar lesser evil, we could've ditched fossil fuel for electricity generation completely by now. Instead we have countries ramping up coal usage and building new gas power plants to replace their nuclear plants. And they still see this as a win.

Those nuclear plants will be indispensable once we start having entire fleets of 18-wheelers recharging at night.

Agree with their battle. It's necessary. Just not with what they've pushed the past 30-odd years.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 23 points 4 months ago

Good on them, modern day heroes.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
211 points (96.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers
668 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS