575
Shouldn't have fucked those kids.
So that’s why the Musk Rat has latched onto Pedophile Donald. Pedos of a feather flock together.
[Ghislaine] Maxwell recruited Giuffre at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Florida in 2000
Let's return the focus to this sentence
Posted this above, might as well pop it here too, seems relevant:
oh he's trying to buy a pardon, lmao
Yup, I thought that as soon as it was announced he was donating
Changes my perspective from earlier. 😆
THAT explains why he all of a Sudden Endorsed Trump! Because Trump, who was BEST FRIENDS with Jeffrey Epstein until Epstein bought a Bigger Mansion, definitely would NOT Protect Elon Musk if it was found out Elon Musk was Raping Kids on Epstein Island!
ok donald time to take away your phone for the night
Explains $48 million a month down payment for favorable outcomes in imminent court cases
The right loves to talk about this global pedo ring they claim to hate so much, but they don't realize its all their leaders and members who are the ones involved.
Don’t have to accept reality if you just refuse to read the news
Deflection. Accuse the opposition of what you're guilty of so when they accuse you of the same, people will be fatigued of hearing about it.
those subpoenas feel nonconsensual Elon?
What if the DOJ gives him a horse?
This obviously changes everything.
Even if he, hypothetically, was the sickest fuck to ever step foot on Epstein's island, he is an American oligarch that will most likely never see any repercussions, since he has the money, like real money to actually make a difference, and influence politically and celebrity wise. So even the best funded Justice department has an annual budget that this guy can donate at a whim to ensure his freedom. His Starlink is being used by Ukraine during this war, so he even has leverage on an American ally. No he is safe as Rain
since he has the money, like real money to actually make a difference, and influence politically and celebrity wise
I agree, but would replace specific category of celebrities with mass media in general.
Starlink is being used by Ukraine during this war
There's no substitute for the low ping times of modern hardware in LEO. Elon is evil. But he's not stupid. As a user myself I think Starlink is a fantastic product, though in a physical package designed by a teenager.
If he'd not fucked around with Twitter he'd have been strongly positioned on either end of the communications industry, positioned to be even more powerful than he is. But, he's gone for a shorter term play at an-cap fascism.
No he is safe as Rain
A perception of justice is prerequisite to a human life of dignity. When society's systems of accountability are broken humans find another way. Sometimes a young man nearly assassinates an ex-President. Sometimes no one cares until researching for the history books.
Have faith. One way or another we'll get the bastard. Or, maybe we'll get lucky: He'll take some more psychedelics and turn into a humanitarian.
Karma bats 1000.
Kissinger laughing at your comment.
But, he’s gone for a shorter term play at an-cap fascism.
Lmfao, the idea that apartheid boy ever had any ideas for himself other than becoming white supremacist super king is as fucking laughable as the idea that he contributed anything to any company he has ever run other than money, or that any of the the work he exploits others for couldn't have been achieved any other way..
load more comments
(4 replies)
X (the website formerly known as Twitter) is reportedly stonewalling subpoena requests related to a legal case involving dead financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Why? Nobody knows, but it sure is weird.
According to Business Insider, the social media platform refuses to give up information about one of the accounts linked to an Epstein accuser, a woman named Rina Oh Amen. The legal case is otherwise unrelated to the platform itself, instead it involves a spat between Oh Amen and another Epstein accuser, the more well-known Virginia Giuffre.
In court filings and public statements, each has accused the other of acting as one of Epstein’s recruiters rather than a true victim.
May he rot in prison.
I'm always on the fence with these subpoena resistance cases.
On the one hand, it's Twitter, Elon, and Epstein related. Fuck all of them.
On the other hand, I don't think that businesses should just blindly turn over information because the DOJ managed to find a judge that would rubber stamp a subpoena. Obviously that's not every subpoena, or even likely a large number of them in the grand scheme, but it happening even once is too much to take it at face value being justified.
This subpoena has nothing to do with the DOJ. This subpoena was issued as part of discovery in the civil defamation case between the two women in the article
Most likely what I think is happening here is X literally does not have the records that are being subpoenaed, because why keep records when you're trying to destroy a business?
For the life of me I don't understand your argument here. You're basically advocating for the destruction of the justice system? So if I try to sue a company for say bodily injury or something they should be able to hide all the evidence? Good lord don't corporations have enough power as is? Why give them more?
His Fifth Amendment rights are still protected.
100% agree. I do love the irony (hypocrisy?) of it all though.
load more comments
(7 replies)
Let's see, we know they project and he called a guy "pedo guy" on twitshit. I wonder what this has to do with that.
Did anyone commenting actually read the article? It isn't about Elon.
The article says they don't know why there is this resistance. It's just speculation. So it could be Elon.
Are you naive enough to think it would have happened without Elon's permission at least?
You may be right. But we don't know that for sure. We can assume it because it makes throwing shit at Elon easier, and believe me I'm happy to throw shit at him, but I want it to be accurate. More importantly that wasn't the context of most comments. They are the standard 'call your opponent a pedophile' tactic that the right wing lazy wankers use. Why? Because who would defend someone accused of being a pedophile? It takes out the person you're against and their defenders. Unfortunately this tactic if throwing an accusations of pedophilia at the drop of a hat lessens the impact of legitimate accusations.
Sure it's not (he doesn't have to be mentioned by name for it to be all over this)..
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
575 points (98.8% liked)
News
36429 readers
663 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS