159
Donald Trump says he 'took a bullet for democracy'
(www.bbc.com)
This man lies like he breathes.
One of the few things that he understands is to accuse other people of exactly what he’s being accused of. If Trump gets called a threat to democracy, he’s going to accuse Biden of being “the real threat to democracy”.
It’s from Steve Bannon’s playbook called “cover the field in shit”, and it stops low-informed voters from easily determining what’s going on, as it plays into a prevailing narrative that all politicians lie. It’s brilliant, it’s wicked, and it’s quickly pushing us towards fascism.
load more comments
(1 replies)
No, John F. Kennedy took a bullet for democracy. You don't even want democracy.
You don't even want democracy.
Trump's intent is easy to judge because we've an adequate and reasonably consistent history of his actions.
The shooter's intent is tougher because it's clouded with judgement of his means. But, if Trump so obviously fights against democracy, it would seem a reasonable assumption that the shooter's intent was the preservation of democracy. And, they didn't just formulate, but carried out a plan that certainly would end in death in defense of democracy.
Regardless of judgement of the shooter's means, what do you think of his intent?
No, the dead man behind Trump took the bullet, Trump only stood in democracy's line of fire. And still stands.
Trump got his ear grazed by a bullet for dictatorship.
This act that the Republicans are putting on right now, to make themselves seem more moderate than they really are, to appeal to centrists, is so unbelievably transparent. It's obviously bullshit, but what's terrifying is that it might actually work. Democrats appear unsettled, Republicans are unified. Trump's assassination attempt makes him seem sympathetic to many. The only thing left for the Republicans to do is convince voters that they've totally changed and that things are going to be different this time, and that it's not going to be like before, they promise. Unfortunately, like an abused spouse, many American voters might give Trump and Republicans that second chance. God help us all.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Pretty sure that retired firefighter that Biden had to shame you into acknowledging took that bullet, Don.
You mean the one who took his children to a convention filled with hate fueled maniacs? That retired firefighter?
Called it.
I said to my co-workers as soon as I heard he got shot at, he was going to claim that he took a bullet for America and Democracy.
But it wasn't exactly hard to call it....the guy is a major narcissist.
He let that bullet slide right past him and into that young family man he fooled.
He fooled him into wanting an king, and then his king passed a bullet onto him.
Isn't it true that trump didn't even call his widow and biden did!? And she refused the call...
load more comments
(3 replies)
Took a bullet implies he intentionally got shot...
No it doesn't. The saying is usually meant to signify that you intentions put yourself in danger and ended up getting shot.
Most soldiers that take a bullet for our country would much rather have not been shot but accepted that risk as reasonable.
Took a bullet usually not means "zipped past my ear and took a tiny bit of ear off".
I'm semantically torn here. He did (narrowly) take a bullet and shooting on politicians is an attack on Democracy. On the other hand he's not exactly on friendly terms with this whole Democracy concept.... In case of friendly fire, can you say you took a bullet for your enemy?
*from democracy
Easy mistake for a senile old man to make
This obese treason weasel is terrified of democracy lol
I thought Republicans HATED Democracy and were Actively calling to Eradicate it like it was a Trans Child?
*took a dump on democracy
Took a bullet means the bullet touched him, I thought he got nicked by shrapnel from his teleprompter screen shattering?
From what I've seen several fact checks have confirmed that the teleprompters were intact and that trump did get shot.
I wanted to say he didn't get shot, but i think that this was just a rumor that spread wild
Edit: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bullet-glass-trump-wound/
Whelp, anyone who took bets on him acting like a war hero over this can now go collect your winnings - which is just more listening to Trump unfortunately.
He thinks he's some Helldivers guy
Well he did say if he had been at the Parkland shooting, he would have confronted the gunman himself.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I mean if there is going to be a super earth it wouldn't be Biden that initiated it
There it is.
The attempt on my life has left me scarred and deformed, but I assure you my resolve has never been stronger. I took a bullet for democracy.
load more comments
(1 replies)
"He died for our sins."
I didn't ask him to do that.
He is not even dead. I want refund.
Maybe we can convince them that he is so that they won't vote?
Who am I kidding, they would absolutely vote for the corpse of Trump.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I'll settle for the belief that he died for my shins, but no more.
Yeah, buddy. That's why the guy tried to shoot you. Sure.
I prefer candidates who didn't get shot.
What was in it for him? What a sucker. What a loser.
That's the kind of thing people who want to be king say.
It's not like there's not an abundance of proof available you anybody. You can listen to his calls on YouTube. The man is horrific.
"BuT wE'rE a CoNsTiTuTiOnAl RePuBlIC"
Prick !
Try harder next time Donny. Just stand still.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
159 points (81.2% liked)
News
23265 readers
3493 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS