289
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by dogsnest@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 62 points 3 months ago

Article links to it on Twitter, which I wish they wouldn't use:

https://x.com/KamalaHarris/status/1816436341703397765

Not bad for a first run. Way better than what Joe was doing.

But I hope she pivots to why she will be a good president instead of how much worse Trump will be.

This is Trump's third election and we had him as president for a term already. Everyone's mind is made up on who trump is and what he'll do.

We need Kamala to tell voters who she is and what she wants to do.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

But I hope she pivots to why she will be a good president instead of how much worse Trump will be.

I feel like we watched two different videos. The whole thing was framed in We have a choice and she presented the two choices.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well put. The best way for Harris to capitalize on her incredible momentum out of the starting gate is to advocate for herself as a candidate and for her policies.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Yep, she's got the biggest microphone on the planet right now.

She needs to come out hard with action plans and goals now, that's what voters want to hear about

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"And then [Harris's] campaign says 'I'm the prosecuter and he's the convicted felon.' " - Donald Trump

I'm Kamala Harris and I approve this message.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

lol I saw it on TikTok too. It's fucking BRILLIANT marketing.

[-] AThing4String@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Now I want them to play the first couple on SNL.

I'm sure Emhoff would be flattered to be so young.

[-] Sumocat@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago

“Legal woes” is quite the euphemism for “felony convictions”. Convicted felon? No, legally woeful.

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I...saw nothing of the sort. No mention of Trumps legal woes at all...

I mean, sure - some light jabs his way, but none of that could have been considered 'targeting his legal woes'

[-] doc@fedia.io 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wow. You're absolutely right.

I hate this timeline where we can't trust any news media to not inject baseless politicisation into news coverage at every opportunity. sigh

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's rage bait. The more extreme your reaction, the more likely you are to click the link. It's the result of everything on the internet being funded by advertisement.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago

My favorite part is that it references Trump but doesn't obsess over him. The tone is, he's that mess we're all going to recover from together, and that is probably bullshit but the vibe is right.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Trump's afraid of her.
He doesn't stand a chance from a verbal assault perspective - she'll steamroll everything he spews.
And she'll slay him in a debate.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

She would slay him if his handlers were stupid enough to let him debate her.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I suspect all she has to do is outright call him a coward and keep assaulting his ego on it.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

That slaps, just like a movie trailer. I'm looking forward to what comes after that. I'd love to see her herself speaking to the voter because a fake-y personal approach works way better than a usual background narration also used there. Based on the points she sat in the vid, she has a lot of stuff to address like that. And that can feel more engaging and humane to those still undecided and on the fence.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

That Beyoncé back really drives this.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That was good! Thanks!

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
289 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
1836 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS