278

Americans’ approval of Supreme Court near historic low: Gallup (thehill.com)

submitted 3 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 66 points 3 months ago

Oh no! Is it because the recent court has allowed mass money into politics? Unconstitutionally made bush president? Overturned rvW? Outlawed homosexuality? Civil servants can unilaterally seize your property?

Anyone undecided, please understand that you aren't "making a choice", the US SCOTUS has illegally ruled that your constitutional rights are not your rights, full stop.

https://time.com/4056051/worst-supreme-court-decisions/

Write to your legislators and demand your constitutional rights!

https://www.congress.gov/members/find-your-member

It's a shockingly small amount of people actually writing into their lawmakers that can change their vote on a law, make the effort.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago

Everyone needs to read this comment.

[-] esc27@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I'm not entirely sure my congress people can read...

[-] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

They outlawed homosexuality?!

[-] finley@lemm.ee 57 points 3 months ago

They don’t care. They’re too busy on their billionaire funded bribery vacations.

[-] Rottcodd@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

Only "near" historic low?

Since we already have at least two overtly corrupt justices whose entire defense consists essentially of "nobody has the authority to do anything about it so fuck you," and the highlights of their last session include ruling that bribery is entirely legal just so long as the check is postdated and that presidents are completely and totally immune from even being investigated over anything that is in any way connected to anything that might by any stretch of the most fevered imagination be considered an "official act " I have to wonder what it will take to actually hit rock bottom.

I have no doubt that, since they have no integrity, no ethics and no regard for either law or the well-being of the country, we'll see.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Only “near” historic low?

According to the article:

The new Gallup poll found 43 percent of Americans approve of how the nation’s highest court is performing its job

The approval rating is just shy of the record-low recorded in September 2021, when 40 percent said they approved.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Ah. So the disclosure of Thomas' gifts, the bribery, and the Presidents-are-Kings thing have started to win back public opinion. god help the rest of us.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Lol, but I'll say it's the opposite: when the majority of the Court was progressive, a high percentage of republicans where unfavorable, however recently they changed their mind because the Court's doing exactly what they want.

So would like to see democrat support for it exclusively.

[-] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 20 points 3 months ago

You mean it's not yet at its historical low?

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 16 points 3 months ago

Historical low was shortly after they repealed RvW.

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 14 points 3 months ago

Surprised it's not 0%.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

There's a large fundamentalist Christian population in the United States. Why wouldn't they approve?

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 3 points 3 months ago

Playing devil's advocate here, "The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed a case that would have limited access to mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in a medication abortion."

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 3 months ago

I imagine that's because most people realize how shit they are, and the remainder are disappointed that they haven't put a literal crown on "he who shall not be named."

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

The Hill Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

The Hill is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Least Biased
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-hill/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024

278 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers

2080 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News