54
submitted 3 months ago by minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] c0smokram3r@midwest.social 26 points 3 months ago

“It works like this: credential holders snap a selfie, Wicket scans the resulting image and compares it to a photo on file to verify their identity as people pass a security checkpoint. Credentialing software provided by UK outfit Accredit Solutions helps to make those checks and determine access rights.”

•I have never heard of/used Accredit Solutions or Wicket so how tf are you comparing it to a photo on file?

“Last year, the franchise also offered spectators the chance to scan a ticket as they entered the ground, which then enabled pre-registered facial biometrics and credit card details to be used at an "Express Beer" lane that allowed acquisition of suds without having do anything more than grin in the right direction.”

•Wow, fuck all the way off w all this shit!

So much for going to anymore sporting events 😫🥴

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago

I'm sure this will go well and is certainly much easier than having badges and security. It's definitely not a massive ploy to harvest more data from the public and sell to the highest bidder

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago
[-] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

Biometric data of individuals faces. Biggest buyer for that market would be law enforcement/government I'd expect.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I imagine the vast majority of people have driver's licenses, the government already has a picture of your face.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago

That is a single datapoint and typically not recent. More data. More data. More data!

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 months ago

Locations and timelines, gait recordings, clothing... Advertisers will love to have that as well

[-] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Doesn't need to be your government who's buying. The picture on your license also doesn't come with meta data about your whereabouts when you decide to go to something as simple as a sporting event.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, that information would just be conveyed by the tickets you paid for with your name on them.

[-] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Didn't realize a picture of my face was on my football ticket as well.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

So you said the government would buy it, so I pointed out that the government already has a facial picture of you. Your counterpoint is that it doesn't have to be the government, in which case, why did you mention it. And then you said it's because it would have meta data on your location, which is weird considering you would have bought tickets with your name on them through payment methods tied to your name. This isn't some local high school game we're talking about here.

[-] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So you said the government would buy it, so I pointed out that the government already has a facial picture of you. Your counterpoint is that it doesn’t have to be the government, in which case, why did you mention it.

I said "government" would be a likely purchaser, not "the" government because I am not talking about any one government. I mentioned it to reinforce the point that any government is a potential buyer for the data, not just the government that has your ID on file, which is counter point to the point you tried to make that "the government already has a facial picture of you" referring to ID when this is not the case for all governments.

As a hypothetical example, I have never been to, or interacted with the government of South Africa. I doubt they have a picture of me. They could likely buy the data if they wanted to, which would give them a picture of me in the hypothetical scenario. They would not otherwise have access to a photo of me. I don't know what is hard to follow about that.

And then you said it’s because it would have meta data on your location, which is weird considering you would have bought tickets with your name on them through payment methods tied to your name.

Yea, and my credit card which I buy the ticket with over the internet does not have a picture of my face with a timestamp verifiably showing that I was at the location, what I was wearing, who I may be with, etc.

You also understand that you can buy things with this neat thing called "Cash" right? Cash is really neat because it's a payment method that doesn't have your name on it.

This is my direct counter point to your statement "you would have bought tickets with your name on them through payment methods tied to your name". Unless you want to deny the existence of physical money, you are plainly wrong here for reasons that are ibid.

You also know that tickets don't typically have your name printed on them right?

https://dygtyjqp7pi0m.cloudfront.net/i/24230/22003478_1.jpg?v=8D2410658E1E630

You can go buy a ticket and examine it as close as you like. It is uncommon for them to have your name one them unless they are for some event you have been explicitly invited to, or you ordered them in advance for pick up or through some third party service.

Probably because the public is free to buy tickets for shows AT the location the event is held? And probably because you don't have to show ID to buy such tickets unless you're purchasing liquor with it or seeing an event rated for adults etc? Do they ask for your ID when you go to the ticket office at the movie theater? Cool, they don't at ticket offices at stadiums either, so if someone has been asking you for that when you buy tickets, you should probably check if your identity was stolen because that's not a requirement to get a ticket!

It's almost like you could buy a ticket without your name printed on it using a method of payment which also doesn't have your name printed on it. What a wild idea! It's almost as if this is how this universally worked before people had debit/credit cards.

Oh and if it's a cashless location, there's another really cool thing you can do called "buying a gift card with cash" which gives you a cashless payment method without giving your name and face away which you can also use to purchase tickets as well as food and drink.

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

They should really use a photo of an NFL team for their article about something the NFL is looking to do. You know, rather than West Virginia University.

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

and get on a list for using the national football league’s photographic assets without express written permission? facebanned

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Get an image fron a vhs cassette it will be fine

[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago
[-] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

To database and sell your biometric data at the expense of privacy under the guise of convenience. This is contemporary business 101. First either steal data or lie through a grinning face to acquire data, then sell the data.

[-] hightrix@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I’ll say the same thing I say at the airport.

“I would like to opt-out please”

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
54 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

31995 readers
505 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS