the only politician rogan understands is the one who has literal brain worms
Rogan is what happens when the barbarian doesn't have a miniature giant space hamster to whisper common sense into his ear.
So like, just your ordinary, run-of-the-mill space hamster then?
Joe have rocks in gut but Joe like trt too much to stop
Jr: Talks about how he picked up a dead bear to "harvest" it, left it in the back of his car for presumably hours, then dumped it in Central Park as a "joke" when he had to go to the airport
JoRo: That's a man I can get behind
How does anybody take either of these people remotely seriously?
This gives him too much credit.
A barbarian khan would legitimately be trying to understand how the world works. Yes, sometimes he has a scientist on and he's forced to learn things. But, other times he has a guest on so that that guest can promote their terrible worldview -- see RFK Jr.
I think of this every time I read what Joe's doing
I can't wait for the tide to turn against Joe Rogan and he becomes another has-been. He's done way too much damage on a lot of important issues.
I don't understand how more people don't see this. It drives me insane. "Did you watch the interview with Joe Rog-" "NO!!!"
Trump lost Joe Rogan bahaha
Spoiler candidates are mostly bad news for Democrats, but I can't imagine many people who would be swayed by a Joe Rogan endorsement would have voted (D} anyway.
The way polling is going, RFK seems to be spoiling Trump, not Harris 🤭
Didn't trump have a talk with brainworms like a month back? I vaguely remember that a poll showed rfk stealing more from Trump.
Thank god Joe is too stupid to understand endorsing RFK will work against Trump.
I welcome his endorsement and hope he has RFK on his show 10 times before the election.
Or he realizes that and he is a coward.
Worms of a brain and all that.
I think it says a lot that this doesn't really move the needle about my opinion of either of them at this point...
Joe Rogan is the dumb man’s smart man, so of course he endorses RFK Jr.
He's straight up just a contrarian at this point. He wants to be "different," by not choosing one of the "mainstream" candidates.
It's also probably a calculated move, financially, as he doesn't want to alienate the people who make up half his audience by endorsing Kamala or Trump. Probably more than half if he endorsed the former.
Typical bourgeois attitude, putting your own financial needs (that are already met 1,000x over) above literally the survival of the Republic.
They're not even nihilists, because they worship at the alter of capital.
It's gross.
Brain worms and bear cruelty are hot button issues for Joe Rogan, apparently. Is anyone really surprised the nutjob would pick the nutjob candidate?
I wonder if Joe's use of deworming medication makes him feel like he and RFK Jr. are kindred numbnuts.
“…Only one that makes sense to me” … I mean you are Joe Rogan… that’s not saying much lmao.
Not about Joe just about a better podcast than his: Behind the bastards has a several episode series on RFK Jr and the things he did.
I'm surprised anything makes sense to this guy.
This is actually a huge deal, enough Republicans listen to him he can probably move the vote almost a whole percentage point
I 100% believe him on that
Signs your ideology might lack internal consistency: you cannot make sense of anything unless it is completely harpic.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News