146
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 117 points 3 months ago

Why can't we just get rid of gendered restrooms altogether?

Just have a room with fully enclosed rooms for a toilet and then a common area for the sinks. Get rid of those stupid flimsy walls with cracks everywhere and two feet of space beneath the door and just have a bunch of individual rooms with a toilet in them. Guys can pee in a toilet, they don't need a uniral.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 46 points 3 months ago

A lot of bathrooms in Sweden are like this. It's so nice to be able to go to the bathroom without people peeking at you through the stall cracks and hearing your every movement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago

There's at least one high school in Minneapolis that's done this. Apparently it's actually going really well.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Because the pearl clutchers won't let them.

[-] murtaza64@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago

My college dorm was like this. Every bathroom was ungendered. The stalls weren't fully floor to ceiling, but were slightly better than the average public bathroom. 99% of people got over it after a little culture shock at the very beginning (maybe 2-3 days).

There was still one women-only bathroom in my building; I believe it was for a few students who asked for religious consideration. No biggie though for almost every student.

It only led to one embarrassing moment for me: I (a guy) was singing Frank Ocean at the top of my lungs while showering. When I came out of the shower a girl was brushing her teeth and made eye contact with me and kind of snickered/giggled. Racewalked back to my room 💀

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I will not give up urinals. They're so much faster and more efficient. Have you SEEN the lines for women's restrooms?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

I’ve starting to see more of those and I love them. They have shared sinks but closest for toilets. It’s nice.

[-] julysfire@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

As much as I agree, that will cost money, therefore it won't happen. I feel the only way a place will do anything that I beneficial to the end user/customer is if it is profitable for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 62 points 3 months ago

“She believes that referring to another person using pronouns that do not correspond with that person’s biological sex is harmful to that person because it is false and harmful to herself because it forces her to lie by denying her religious beliefs and scientific evidence,” it continues.

Do you need another strand of pearls because you clutched the first one too hard, Karen?

[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

No, but I could use some chalk. My brain hands were slipping during that round of mental gymnastics.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Someone should send her a box of white bead necklaces lmao

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

Can trans students sue to avoid sharing a restroom with cis classmates?

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago

Can students sue to avoid sharing a restroom with bigots if that is against my religion?

[-] cynthorpe@discuss.online 45 points 3 months ago

Can I sue to avoid sharing a bathroom with anyone?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I would support this lawsuit. With an added provision that if it must be a shared public bathroom, if someone talks to you for a non-emergency reason: 10 years to life. Especially if they try to have an actual chat. That's just felonious.

[-] cynthorpe@discuss.online 6 points 3 months ago

Can we have eye contact be a gross misdemeanor?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theherk@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

This seems to have some merit.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

There's no previous cases of assault or harassment of cis people by trans people for using the bathroom. Their fears are not valid. It's as valid as a student suing because they have a phobia of the color grey and can't be forced to use a bathroom that has any grey in it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

The stupidest part to me is that cis women could also potentially assault other cis women in public restrooms but these bigots haven’t even considered that possibility.

Also, if you are a cis man and are just desperate to sexually assault a woman in a public restroom, I would think that a janitor’s uniform and a mop would be enough.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 32 points 3 months ago

Cab I, a cis person, sue for being required to share a bathroom with other cis people?

I don't want to share bathrooms, thank you. That's a violation of my religious beliefs (in my religion, pooping is a sin).

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

Why are we letting conservatives into public restrooms? They are notorious child-rapists and are known to attack innocent people in bathrooms if they don't like the look of them.

There is no room for conservatism or other hate-based ideologies in a modern civilization.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sounds a bit like the ol' 'gay panic' defense.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Sounds like Jim Crow era segregation

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

That's exactly what it is. "These children could be raped by a trans person!" Or they could be raped by a cis person. Of their own gender or another gender.

In general, it's not hard to find a time to sneak into a bathroom when no one's looking. It's not like they're usually in some prominent place.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Cool, they want to return to separate but equal. Fucking weirdos.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I don't think they're interested in the "equal" part at all.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

It never was equal, tho. Thats just the mantra they used to justify the segregation

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

The American right: "I am so aroused by pissing and shitting and farting that I cannot pee downward if trans children are in earshot of me!"

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

“She believes that referring to another person using pronouns that do not correspond with that person’s biological sex is harmful to that person because it is false and harmful to herself because it forces her to lie by denying her religious beliefs and scientific evidence,” it continues.

I hate this argument. I’m conservatives and I will try to use the pronouns of choice. To me it’s just being polite. It’s like a name preference. You try to respect it. If you religion teaches you to be an asshole to everyone then it’s time to rethink your religion.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago

It is amazing how few problems people have that they have the time and energy to spend on non issues like this.

[-] ChaoticGoodHeart@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago

America is a nation full of people with nothing to complain about, complaining about nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Can the trans students sue for being harassed and bullied? That would be great

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

My daughter has a very close trans friend (who the school forces to use the girl's room anyway). A girl was being a bigot to him in the bathroom, so he slapped her. Guess who did not get in trouble?

Hint: not the openly queer one.

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Okay fine, fine, the boys don't have to share a bathroom with trans girls anymore.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just a reminder that you can sue for just about anything. That doesn't mean you have a chance in hell of winning.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Simple protest is just smash urinals or pour something like concrete into them. After a couple repairs, they will just start replacing them all with stalls... then there will be no difference between bathrooms.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
146 points (96.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
1455 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS