308
submitted 3 months ago by owiseedoubleyou@lemmy.ml to c/til@lemmy.world
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 108 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Trump would support the holocaust if he thought it would make more people like him.

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 43 points 3 months ago

I mean........he kinda does. At least a lot in his party do.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

What I think you're saying is: He doesn't care about having more people like him (read as, people similar to himself). He cares that more people like him (read as, people who worship him).

[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

that's the magic of having no consistency, you can find anything and its opposite in 40+ years of uncontrolled rambling, scheming, lying and cheating.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Political party

Republican (1987–1999, 2009–2011, 2012–present)

Other political

affiliations

Reform (1999–2001)

Democratic (2001–2009)

Independent (2011–2012)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago

Really looking like Trump's the true RINO.

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I'm not certain he would be able to come up with ways to insult people that aren't just projecting the insults that hurt him. He doesn't even usually know what they mean at first. He'll just project onto them a random negative thing people have said about him and then either deny it if it didn't stick, or lean into it if it did.

He's not creative enough to come up with insults actually about them on the spot. Those have to be pre-planned or handed to him.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Seems like he just wants to be a contrarian asshole, especially if you look from the Clinton years onward.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

There was a Trump interview from the 90s where he said that if he ever ran for office he would go Republican because they were stupid, gullible and easily manipulated. Sadly I cannot find that interview anymore.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Did not see where he said he would run as Republican

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Yeah, he doesn't. He praises republican leaders and policies, but no where does he say he'd run as a republican nor call the voters stupid. The man makes himself look bad enough, we don't need misinformation

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 10 points 3 months ago

He didn't say any of those things in your linked video.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

You are absolutely right, but this is the interview that is being referred to as far as I can discern. I think people tried to infer he was calling them stupid? Something to do with praising republican leaders and policies maybe? Definitely a stretch, and we don't need misinformation to make this scum look bad

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

It’s honestly shocking how different he is now in speeches. He still came off as a sleaze bag 30 years ago, but not someone I would assume is functionally illiterate.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Right? This must be the nostalgia goggles his cult is wearing

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I managed to stop the page from loading the paywall. Lots of text incoming

If Oprah Winfrey’s “active thinking” about a run for the nation’s top office evolves into a bid to unseat Donald Trump in 2020, there’s one clip of the pair that’s already the front-runner to be played ad infinitum.

It’s a nearly three-minute video from a 1988 interview on Winfrey’s show. In the hot seat is a blue-suited, much younger Donald Trump, espousing the same protectionist beliefs that would ultimately land him in the Oval Office.

With the microphone is, of course, Winfrey, asking Trump questions that could easily be aimed at a 2018, post-Golden Globes version of herself:

This sounds like political, presidential talk to me. And I know people have talked to you about whether or not you want to run — would you ever?

In 1988, it was another celebrity interview. But in the intervening three decades, the stars of the clip have become some of the most famous faces on the planet, and more political. One is president and has launched a reelection committee. The other endorsed Barack Obama, then Hillary Clinton, and is facing a renewed round of calls that she seek the presidency after a Golden Globes message that many have likened to a political stump speech.

Their 1988 interview happened shortly after Trump had taken out a full-page ad criticizing U.S. foreign policy. George H.W. Bush and Michael Dukakis were embroiled in a race for the presidency.

So Winfrey quickly steered the conversation to politics — particularly whether Trump would ever be involved in it.

He demurred with the same answer he’d given time and again:

“I love what I’m doing,” the real estate magnate said on the clip. “I really like it,” but he said he would “never want to rule it out totally, because I really am tired of seeing what’s happening with this country, how we’re really making other people live like kings and we’re not.”

Oprah Winfrey’s presidential candidate-esque Golden Globes speech, annotated

Thirty years later, it is Winfrey apparently mulling whether to place her life on hold to steer the country.

The apparent reconsideration is happening after Winfrey gave an inspiring call to arms encouraging people — including “some pretty phenomenal women” — to help effect change:

“I want all the girls watching here and now to know that a new day is on the horizon! And when that new day finally dawns, it will be because of a lot of magnificent women, many of whom are right here in this room tonight, and some pretty phenomenal men, fighting hard to make sure that they become the leaders who take us to the time when nobody ever has to say “me too” again.

As The Washington Post’s Steven Zeitchik wrote afterward, “Winfrey’s speech had a stump-like quality, earning raves for its inspirational tone, its careful balance of deep scars of racial and gender injustice with an optimism that they could be healed.”

Friends told CNN anonymously that Winfrey was “actively thinking” about running for president. Her longtime partner, Stedman Graham, said she “would absolutely do it.”

Afterward, Meryl Streep told Zeitchik that she was on the Oprah train. “She launched a rocket tonight. I want her to run for president,” Streep said. “I don’t think she had any intention [of declaring]. But now she doesn’t have a choice.”

Although both Trump and Winfrey have a show-business pedigree and billionaire bank accounts, the two stars of that 1988 clip have vastly different backstories.

Trump was the fourth child of a millionaire real estate developer and was raised in a 23-room brick mansion in Jamaica Estates, Queens. He attended a military school and started his real estate empire with a million-dollar loan from his father.

Winfrey told the Golden Globes audience that she is the daughter of a woman who made money cleaning other people’s houses. Winfrey’s nationally syndicated talk show became a launchpad for a global media empire that turned her into a billionaire.

Several women have accused Trump of inappropriate sexual touching. In 2005, Trump bragged in vulgar terms about groping, kissing and trying to have sex with women in a conversation caught on a hot microphone, a recording that was later obtained by The Post.

Winfrey has spoken publicly about her sexual abuse at the hands of her mother’s friends in Mississippi, and she spoke at length about abuse victims in her Golden Globes speech.

“I want tonight to express gratitude to all the women who have endured years of abuse and assault because they, like my mother, had children to feed and bills to pay and dreams to pursue,” she said. “They’re the women whose names we’ll never know.”

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

I suspect it was faked personally

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I saw it years before deepfakes were a thing. I wish I had saved the video now. I would have loved to take a more critical look at it.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Another commentor corrected my info.

I had suspected it was faked because I only ever saw his picture and a quote like it was designed to look like a magazine. Turns out it's a direct quote from an Oprah interview he did in the late 80's

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

It actually is not a direct quote. He never said it

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It was with Oprah Winfrey in 1988. Try again

Edit: it isn't fake, but it is false

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Please explain the edit a bit

Edit: also thank you for the info. I had only ever seen a picture with the quote and his face. So the video source is new for me and given the stated age, not faked.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

There is an actual interview that is referenced, but what is being said about the interview is false

[-] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

Trump has historically been for or against whatever he thinks will be the best for him.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

When you don’t have any convictions of your own, you can be simultaneously for and against everything under the sun. Donny is a perfect example. He is always eager to sell out to whoever soothes his ego and fills his pocket. Putin and Saudis know this and exploit the fuck out of Don.

Just remember how Putin got Donny to pull US out of several critical arms treaties that ensured American safety for decades. Media glossed over it and don’t even talk about how Trump made everyone far less safe than what immigrants could ever do

When you don’t have any convictions of your own...

Weelllll...I'm pretty sure Trump has some convictions now that the jury has weighed in.

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Turns out Republicans are easier to grift. There's a turn up for the books.

[-] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Putin and Saudis know this and exploit the fuck out of Don.

Is it being exploited when in return they get you the ~~future dictator~~ POTUS position?

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Sure, it would be paid by taxes that he wasn't paying. Makes sense.

[-] Waldowal@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I'm somewhat ashamed to admit it, but back before he did "The Apprentice", I'll admit I was somewhat fascinated by Trump as a business "mogul". I read at least 5 of his books starting with "Art of the Deal". Here are some highlights I remember:

  • He constantly bragged about deals in which he completely fucked someone over. Not once did he acknowledge it - at all. It's like it never entered his mind. Or, that the more he fucked someone over, the more proud he was.

  • He bragged about never preparing for speeches. He likes to completely wing it every time - which I guess is obvious.

  • He claimed to never eat lunch. Too busy "making deals" he said.

  • He used to be very good friends with the Clintons. Went to their parties often. Spoke very highly of them.

  • Didn't mention Jeffrey Epstein at all. You know, like all those pictures of them together might have been a secret?

  • Talked about times when he was flat broke or in the hole and how he needed to fake that he was rich to keep up appearances so people would want to do deals with him. I remember one paragraph where he was walking into a building in NY with Ivanka and pointed out a homeless person and told her "See that man. He has more money than me."

Long before he entered politics, based on those books, I knew Donald Trump was a despicable piece of shit.

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

During his presidency I heard people say he thinks there's no such thing as a win-win deal. According to him, one party has to be a loser, and the more they lose the more you win. Your first point seems to point to that as well.

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Also he left the Reform party because David Duke joined. Then after getting the GOP nom " David Duke? Never heard of him..." such a clown.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

just to both party this Trump also donated to Democratic causes on top of funding Republican causes including Harris

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-donation-kamala-harris/

[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago

maybe im just misremembering, but didnt he even kinda float the idea in speeches in the beginning of his 2016 campaign? medicare for all was a pretty big topic back then.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
308 points (95.3% liked)

Today I Learned

17901 readers
185 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS