143
I heard of Yarvin before he was (in)famous and I'm amazed at how close he has gotten to power, given how far outside of the mainstream his ideas are.
Yarvin sounds even more deranged than Trump.
He's the worst kind. The kind with a fucked up vision.
Trump only has a vision of his bank account, the danger comes from his incompetence and apathy to what happens around him as far as the government goes.
I think thats what trump was looking for. Someone people would want in charge less than him. Jokes on him though as its the exact things his rapid fans would want over him and they are more likely to do the deed as well.
I listened to a podcast about Vance and where he got his ideas. They said that group of people think there are 3 kinds of government: 1) democracy, 2) oligarchy. 3) monarchy.
They think democracy has failed and become an oligarchy. So their solution is to overthrow everything and put in a American monarchy.
Yup this is the one Yarvin and Vance:
Techno libertarians, white nationalists and JD Vance are all linked to a movement known as the 'New Right.' What is this movement and how has it influenced the Republican candidate for vice president?
[On Point | Podcast] JD Vance and the rise of the 'New Right' #onPointPodcast https://podcastaddict.com/on-point-podcast/episode/180222410 via @PodcastAddict
This is terrible, and he needs to be stopped. Having said that, Rasputin was said, and this is all I could think about.
It’s a helluva drug
I just started watching the History of the World Part 2 and all I can think of is Johnny Knoxville now.
Curtis Yarvin is also adjacent to the Effective Altruism people. Got to make a yarn and thumbtack chart of the connections...
Everytime I read some story like this I wonder at what point we are finally turning THEM into biodiesel?
I kept saying something similar every time I learned more about project 2025. These people are so goddamn evil and misguided in their convictions it's an absolute mystery how we all just sit back and let it happen, myself included.
Sounds like a shittier version of Snow Crash...
How do people like this exist? Why can't it just be enough to have more money than you could ever spend?
These people have an illness.
New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for New Republic:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Vox - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Vox:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Wikipedia - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Wikipedia:
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23373795/curtis-yarvin-neoreaction-redpill-moldbug
https://newrepublic.com/article/183971/jd-vance-weird-terrifying-techno-authoritarian-ideas
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)
politics
19096 readers
1905 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS