327
submitted 3 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 117 points 3 months ago

You have to be a really special kind of stupid to ever have believed that a billionaire conman is “for” anyone but himself.

[-] skvlp@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago
[-] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

What is that, some kind of eastern thing?

[-] RangerJosie@sffa.community 58 points 3 months ago

He's a carpetbagger. Always was. I hope people are finally waking up to that.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not to be pedantic, but he really isn't a carpetbagger. I mean, he's absolutely the type, but "carpetbagger" specifically refers to a politician who moves into a geographical area to run for office. The carpetbag was a type of cheap suitcase, meant to conjure the image of a hurried relocation for personal gain. In that sense, a carpetbagger is an opportunist and egocentric, which definitely describes Trump. And he did move from New York to Florida, but he never ran for local office as a Floridian. He was elected President, and is running for that office again. He's always been from the United States. He could just as easily run for president out of New York or New Jersey or New Mexico. His political identity isn't related to where he lives.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

I thought carpetbagging explicitly meant what you said, but moving to reconstruction south from one of the union states.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, that's how it originated, and it was further used to describe any opportunistic politician moving to another geographic region to win elections there.

[-] MrGG@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

Thank you for your ~~service~~ pedantry.

[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah! Let's stick to just calling him a complete bellend!

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, for a better example of carpetbagging (and juicing some guy's beetle in public) we have Lauren Bobo.

[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Why is the New York Times just waking up to that? They're supposed to be a news organization.

[-] RangerJosie@sffa.community 0 points 3 months ago

All the news corps, are corps.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

his presidency already showed this

[-] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

People remember gas prices when there was covid and no one was driving. The cost per oil barrel was at one point negative.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

To be fair, the did get pretty high when everyone started driving and the oil industry has to spin back up after that pandemic lull. Demand outpaced supply.

And then there was OPEC fucking around, and Russia invading a nation. Even though the US produces more than it needs, the oil market prices were high as fuck.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago

Tankers were literally paying people to buy oil because you can't just stop the pipelines and people forget that lol

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Let's not forget, the orange turd dropped some threats to withhold military aid with Saudi Arabia to scale back gas during covid...which had a much bigger impact on gas prices spiking the following year. You know, the same time his cult followers were plastering "i did that" stickers on the pumps

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Which, now that Biden has started to think outside the box and use the strategic oil reserves in creative ways, are the most stable they’ve been in a long time.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

Soooo.... His base is like 10 billionaires now? That's a winning ticket.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

And a whole lot of serfs that just love their master, while saying they do it for freedom.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Based on the number of flags, yard signs, car decals and dipshits wearing shirts/hats I still see on a daily bases, his base may be getting smaller, but it's still full of devoted cultists

[-] 2piradians@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

He doesn't pretend to have anyone's best interest in mind but his own. Why people don't see that, or worse support those aims, is beyond me.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

Great story of how Trump tried to get in good with the Manhattan elites. He'd been given a golden opportunity to impress them, and threw it away through stupidity, greed, and arrogance.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaellisicky/2020/10/03/how-donald-trump-took-down-bonwit-teller-a-fifth-avenue-landmark/

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I love the twist appearance by John Barron

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Counter argument.

Trump did a press conference next to some breakfast sausages yesterday, and he promised to give me cheaper sausages.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 3 months ago

He should give us cheap sausages now if he wants any credibility.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Puerto Rico Trump: Stands on a stage chucking single sausages at a crowd.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I saw a gif reenactment of that the other day

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They’re not going to be Jimmy Dean, exactly, but he’ll flood the market with cheaper James Dean sausages. Live fast, die young.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The way they were placed looked more like a product placement.

[-] Unlocalhost@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Watch for what he does and ask why? Notice he's also trying to make a case for stealing the election. Connect the dots...

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/16/opinion/trump-labor-working-class.html?unlocked_article_code=1.DU4.1mhl.2_rpRNOenstA
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
327 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1735 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS