398
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 103 points 3 months ago

Wait... wasn't he just giving a "press conference" about how grocery prices have gone up? If not price controls, what will hinder price gouging?

[-] kevindqc@lemmy.world 76 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Only he can do it. With big numbers, the best. I mean low

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Only by giving massive amounts of no-strings-attached government money to Smithfield and ConAgra while lightly scolding them about shrinkflation can we address high grocery costs!

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 18 points 3 months ago

He will simply tell the companies they have to lower the prices, and they will say "no way" and he will say "way".

Problem solved.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Weren’t you paying attention? He’s not going to use price controls, he’s going to use container size controls.

It can’t be communist if it’s big!

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago

the shrinkflation shall continue until his tiny hands can wrap themselves around a can of diet coke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We need to De-Woke the agricultural sector. There are too many regulations. Not enough people can keep a cow in their back yard and sell milk to the neighbors.

Retvrn to Tradition!

[-] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

backyard chickens in cities.

Of course going vegan could also lower prices.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Tax cuts for the elite. It will trickle down to cheaper groceries. Read the art of the deal already.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 6 points 3 months ago

More tax reliefs for rich people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 74 points 3 months ago

I genuinely wish we lived in the world they fear so much

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago
[-] grte@lemmy.ca 64 points 3 months ago

Surely linking affordable groceries to communism will make affordable groceries less popular rather than communism more popular.

[-] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

Yes, if cheaper groceries are communist, then I’m ready for my hammer and sickle.

[-] lechatron@lemmy.today 28 points 3 months ago

then I’m ready

Then WE'RE ready, comrade.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Wait, we get cheaper groceries AND free tools?

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Free tools that’ll probably last 1,000 years too. Like, say what you want about the quality of some more complex Soviet products — the cars famously sucked — but there was no planned obsolescence on basic tools.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago

The reason publicly traded companies continually raise prices is the pressure from Wall Street to continually make more money than you did last month, last quarter, last year.

Say you sell 1,000,000 hamburgers and make a 20% profit on it.

Unless you make more money next year, selling that same 1,000,000 hamburgers, Wall Street is going to punish you. They don't care that you're profitable.

You either sell more burgers or raise prices.

[-] esc27@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Yeah. They treat profit like a necessary business expense or a cost, and balance their budgets around it. Which perverts a fundamental of economics.

I'm starting to think the stock market is just a really awful bank that is sometimes also a ponzi scheme.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Thank Jack Welch and Milton Friedman

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

A while back, Exxon set a record for any company in a quarter and everyone was going "Wooo!" and I was like "Well, gas prices are going up then... Think about next quarter and this quarter next year..."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 43 points 3 months ago

Anyone that listens to him is a fucking moron.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

Kamala’s plan is some sort of vague “stop price gouging,” but Trumps plan is even vaguer. His plan was to hold a press conference next to some sausages and say that his administration would lower prices. He gave even fewer specifics.

His actual plans are project 2025.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

I AGREE, instead Kamala should do what Trump did and give us all multiple stimulus checks. Like how about every month. We can call it "Universal Basic Income."

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 months ago

American Basic Income. Don't make it and all weird and European sounding/s

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago
[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Veteran approved Freedom Bucks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You know how you end up with communism? You make it so nobody can afford their fucking groceries.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Trump called it "the Maduro plan" and I'm laughing. What an idiot!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

Only words left in the conservative vocabulary: "Socialist" and "communist"

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

I mean... Price control is kinda anti-capitalist, he's not wrong.

And no I will not vote for Donald Trump.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago

IDGAF what they call it. Lower the damn prices! Sacrifice a billionaire to the capitalist god or something.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 22 points 3 months ago

You have to keep sacrificing the billionaires to the Invisible Hand until market equilibrium is restored.

[-] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Maybe $10 000 to each person per year in food stamps, and $5000 extra payment if they maintain a BMI under 25.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 34 points 3 months ago

I mean... Price control is kinda anti-capitalist,

Good. Fuck capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Price control is kinda anti-capitalist, he’s not wrong.

It's authoritarian, but still very capitalist in function. The state is regulating the rate at which you can raise prices, not who profits from the sales.

And no I will not vote for Donald Trump.

I wouldn't lose too much sleep over the decision. In the end, I predict this election will be decided 6-3.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I need to eat every day whether it's profitable for Jim Perdue or not. Capitalism is a terrible way to run food distribution or healthcare.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

The informed consumer is a great price control in the free market.

This is why I don't buy whatever crap that Trump flogs or for that matter tic tacs.

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

The informed consumer is a great price control in the free market.

What does that even mean? We all see prices rising.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

I think there is a difference between price-fixing and putting a stop to price-gouging.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Well of course paying lower prices is clearly communist /s

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Fucking called it. That's all he knows to do.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Communism would do much more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Did he confuse the word consumerist ?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
398 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1851 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS