Trump rally: In battleground Pennsylvania, Trump tries to counter Harris’ surge | AP News (apnews.com)

submitted 2 months ago by dogsnest@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 93 points 2 months ago

Robert A. Bridy, 64, a laborer from Shamokin, Pennsylvania, traveled to the rally to show support for Trump. He said the election feels tight in this state and added that his union and a close friend are trying to convince him to vote for Harris and other Democrats, but he has voted for Trump since 2016.

“It’s close. You can’t change Democrats’ minds no matter what. They’ve got a one-track mind, and that’s it,” he said.

Bridy called Trump a “working class guy like us.” Trump is a billionaire who built his fortune in real estate.

“He’s a fighter,” Bridy said. “I’d like to see the closed borders. He doesn’t mess around. He goes at it right away and takes care of business the way it should be.”

The brain washing that's been done to these people is truly something else.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 33 points 2 months ago

This actually tells you how to convince these people to vote for you. Hint: they don't care about policies.

Remember when trump said "Take the guns first, then worry about it later"? That's what these people like: action. The Democrats should just act and force the Supreme Court to stop them.

Declare all student loans forgiven and let the Republicans deal with the fallout. Negotiate more than 20 drug prices, for all Americans immediately. Direct the FTC to investigate food price collusion. This shit literally grows on trees and you can buy fresh food directly from farmers for almost nothing. Moving it a few hours away to a city should not jack up the price substantially.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 months ago

That person is literally too stupid to vote in his own best interest.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

No need to worry!

It's only ~50% of the people you transact with!

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

You mean 22%?

Rump got 74 million votes in 2020, which is 22% of the US total population of 330M.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

I mean of people who were arsed to vote!

And there's ZERO reason to argue that it's not reflective of the general population.

And it's ONE THIRD of the eligible voters (c.250M?). As are the Dems. One third doesn't vote!

Why the pedantry?

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Because pretty much all Republicans vote. 22% represents their entire voting base.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Because there’s also no reason to believe that the 40% who didn’t vote support anyone over a specific candidate.

Most likely, they just don’t care and don’t support either party.

[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

They were more than happy to have a very reasonable chance of having Trump in the office by choosing not to vote.

Not as bad as voting for him but still not a great excuse.

There’s also no reason to believe that 100% of those people would not vote for Trump. What is most likely is that the proposition would be roughly similar, maybe a bit lower

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

There’s also no reason to believe that 100% of those people would not vote for Trump. What is most likely is that the proposition would be roughly similar, maybe a bit lower

You have no basis for that belief.

That’s the point I’m trying to make clear: you don’t know why they didn’t vote.

What is clear is that they didn’t vote. Which you’re… basically arguing doesn’t suggest apathy.

In short we have no idea why they didn’t vote. Only that they didn’t vote; and that implies at least some apathy.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why the pedantry?

You're misunderstanding my point. Don't accidentally overrepresent and legitimize the Fascist Right by assuming that because 47% of people who voted wanted Trump, that 47% of the entire US wanted Trump. In reality US voter turn out is consistently dogshit and the huge political right-wing hubbub is driven by <20% of the actual population, who also somehow claim there's some "silent majority" supporting them. (there's not; those who don't vote either don't care or are intentionally suppressed/disenfranchised by, you guess it, the same fascist right!)

They must be painted as the weird, fringe crazy pots that they are. There is no helping that camp.

[-] eee@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago

“It’s close. You can’t change Democrats’ minds no matter what. They’ve got a one-track mind, and that’s it,” he said.

Bridy called Trump a “working class guy like us.”

Am I reading The Onion or what?!

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They truly live in a completely different world then the rest of the... well, world.

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

The Republicans started with that command though. They’ve been denying facts for _ decades_.

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago

Someone should inform him there isn’t a real estate developer in the US that hasn’t utilized the labor of undocumented workers.

[-] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They really do just grow on the underside of rocks, don't they?

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Pennsyltucky is a real place. And too damn close to me.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

This Man knows what he's talking about! Trump, the Strong Man who told Republicans to KILL a PERFECT Border Bill, DOESN'T mess around when it comes to Protecting Our Border!

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

They've had some support but they mainly did it to themselves.

[-] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

They did all their own research

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024

87 points (92.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers

5412 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News