298

Street view from Google Maps:

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 55 points 3 months ago

Looks like a cities skyline player finally got a job in city planning

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Huh, Madison Wisconsin sure looks different than the last time I was there.

[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 45 points 3 months ago

Bus stop doesn't get used

"See?! No one wants to use public transit. We should build another lane."

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Coming from a city with a working transit system to a city with shitty transit, that has been the defense.

"Why invest resources to something people don't use?" They said to me, as I literally use the thing they don't want to invest in.

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 32 points 3 months ago

🎶Feliz Boulevard🎶

[-] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 months ago

Better explain why pedestrian crossings are stretched so much instead of being on shortest trajectory to other side

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

I hate shortened crossings. Pedestrian crossings should follow the flow of pedestrians. Bikes shouldn't have to slow down to make sharp turns just to cross the street. There should be crossings that go in a sensible line.

[-] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Crossings should be safe for humans and bikes. Meaning, they should be short and bikes should not be ridden across intersections if no bike lane

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

If there's no bike lane, and bikes can't ride across intersections, how on earth are bikes supposed to get around at all?

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Get off the bike and push it.

I know, it's not a great solution but think about it - if you're on a bike you're faster than a pedestrian and there's a high chance a car won't see you if they aren't already stopped (assuming there's no traffic light to regulate traffic).

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Doesn't matter if the car sees me, I'll see the car. I'm always careful. Any time my attention is compromised, I do get off. When I'm healthy and cautious, I ride.

[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I also thought it was a bit of a wild request for bikes to only cross where bike infra exists. If we can't make progress in driver behavior, we should build more mode separation to contain the thousand pound death machines in their own physically isolated section of the street. At no point should we be compromising bicycle or pedestrian mobility. We have a right to the street also, and it's the cars who have trouble co-existing with the other modes of transportation without murdering a bunch of people.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Bikes belong in the road.

If you're in a pedestrian path with a bicycle, you should be dismounted

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

Given that's not the law in my country, I have to assume that it's your personal opinion. And your personal opinion that I should risk my life just to get to the grocery store is fucked.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online -5 points 3 months ago

Your personal opinion is that you should risk the lives of pedestrians by riding a vehicle in their path?

Its not about laws, its about morality.

[-] vala@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Weird thing is that you can ride slowly and safely while passing pedestrians.

Making a general statement like this is just completely ignorant of the reality of living in cities where car drivers HATE bikes and will absolutely kill you if you try riding in the road.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Yes. I also think doctors should risk the lives of patients by prescribing antibiotics for bacterial infections. This is a risk because some patients have undiagnosed penicillin allergies. There is always a level of acceptable risk. Given that nobody has ever been killed by a bicycle they weren't riding in my country, I find the risk acceptable. The pedestrians on the route I take have a higher chance of dying from lung cancer due to car pollution, PER CAR, than from me killing them.

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I mean, getting hit by a bike hurts, but it doesn't kill you. Still, I'm not a fan of people endangering and inconveniencing others so they themselves can be safer either. But that's what people are like. That's one of the reasons everyone should be pro bike lane, even if they don't cycle.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've been in cities where the "bike lane" was a "Parked car door zone"

Some of these cities literally made it illegal to not ride in the bike lanes. Not everyone should be pro bike lane, especially when they're death lanes

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I meant that as in 'everyone should be pro creating safe bike lanes'. Sorry I wasn't clear

[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

In my area, bikes are allowed on all sidewalks except for a street-bounded square around the downtown core where we must ride in the street. When on the sidewalk, we are expected to yield to pedestrians. This works in practice, mostly due to low volume of bikes and pedestrians, and in some places 12 food wide sidewalks specifically designated as class 1 urban trails that even allow some ebikes. In practice, this works okay but you are definitely forced to have little micro interactions with people to negotiate sidewalk space or signal your intentions. Cyclists go to the sidewalk as a last resort because it's often not a comfortable place for us to ride, just less likely to get us killed. I will never understand cyclists who don't ring. It's a bad look for our ability to share space. Unlike cars, bicycles and pedestrians are close enough in speed to occasionally mix.

I do agree that in city centers and high traffic areas, riders should dismount.

[-] Bezier@suppo.fi 2 points 3 months ago

It seems to be a 4-way intersection.

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

To optimize the intersection for car traffic. Or maybe rather to minimize signal wait times.

If pedestrians could take the shortest path, it would roughly double the size of the intersection in both width and height. Which then requires clearing times on each signal pass to be longer. Which ultimately makes everybody wait longer at the intersection, including pedestrians.

So, that is one possible explanation. I guess you didn't really ask for one, and maybe I should also add that it's just that; an explanation, not a justification.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

Had to go on street view for myself. I now have a single screenshot of the bus stop on feliz and the one on crystal, both in the same direction on the same road. Who did this and why??

Fun side note, the crystal stop has a sign that says "public transit gets you LA'd". Amazing

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

LA bus transit is amazing. It's cheap, regular, the driver regularly waives you through if you don't have the correct change, and if you're disabled, the driver will get out and strap you down himself to ensure you get to where you need to be.

Coming from UK/Europe perspective, the LA bus system seemed a little dirtier or sketchier than the ones I'm accustomed to... but the service was stellar.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 months ago

It's like they want you to die.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

Jeez, I feel like I'm getting second-hand asthma just from looking at that photo.

[-] Michal@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago

The google street view photo may be misleading, there's a bus shelter beside the bench. It's not great as it doesn't protect from street noise, but at least provides some shade.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

I’m less worried about the sun (a very real concern in LA, but I don’t leave the house without a sun jacket) than I am about the 12 lanes of traffic surrounding it without any kind of barrier. I always see shattered glass leftover from previous wrecks at big intersections like this, it’s not something I really want to be near as a pedestrian if one happens while I’m there.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago
[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Los Tan Enojada Blvd

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Hey, I know a pretty similar bus stop in Hamburg, Germany: https://maps.app.goo.gl/SMa5unXew4uAfVtPA

Can confirm, it sucks to wait there. Hard to reach (always tempting to risk your life for catching the bus), noisy, stinky, plus ours has bicyclists zooming through the isle.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

It's pretty versatile, no? The bus can come from either diagonal and go in more ways than a normal stop could.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

I'm not saying that's good, but I feel like I've seen far worse. Like the ones that are just a pad of cement and a pole with a bus sign. There might be nearby businesses to indicate where people could go when they use the bus, maybe a desire path, but no actual pedestrian infrastructure.

[-] OlPatchy2Eyes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It does look miserable but if the bus stop was before the landing then would it not prevent cars trying to take the turn before the island?

[-] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

I believe car drivers are capable of waiting 15 seconds while vehicle which most likely transports multiple times more passengers dropping/picking those passengers. Car drivers wait hours in traffic jams for themselves, can wait a bit for bunch of people in a bus

[-] LovesTha@floss.social 2 points 3 months ago

@Lysergid @OlPatchy2Eyes Is it a scheduled stop? Having a bus sit there for 5 minutes when it is running fast would really suck. But I'd need a lot more than such a screen shot to know if this is a horrible stop or one that just looks silly.

There is a lot that goes into where stops should optimally be.

[-] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Why sit there 5 mins? This looks like normal city bus stop. Bus arrives at scheduled time, picks up passengers and takes off. I believe great ‘merica supper power nation can manage what Eastern Europe nations made happen years ago. Yes you may have few mins delays but it’s not a disaster.

If for whatever reason it must sit there for long time bust stop should be in a bay

[-] LovesTha@floss.social 0 points 3 months ago

@Lysergid schedules should be set up for 'normal' traffic, some days have less traffic than that.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Idk what there is to complained about. They put 4 bus stops at one intersection

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
298 points (97.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9818 readers
136 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS