738
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 142 points 3 months ago

Thankfully nothing is ever really removed from the internet.

Such as this picture

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Lmaoo this is the picture ElMo doesn't want us to see

[-] Kidding_me@lemmy.world 131 points 3 months ago
[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 99 points 3 months ago

He only wrote that to improve image and sales. He still knows it's the right thing, but he never cared about that.

Remember when Elon started leaning into being an internet sensation and memelord? I think that's when his campaign for more power started. Economic power is no longer enough.

His interview with Trump shows nothing less than Elon trying to get himself in good standing with the MAGA crowd. I guess he decided that conservative and reactionary politics are best for amassing power.

Wouldn't surprise me if Elon runs for president or some other influential position once Trump is gone. He clearly wants to be perceived as a younger, smarter, more moderate Trump.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago

Thankfully, he can't run for president. And he's doing the exact same thing as Trump who even said publicly that he would become a Republican because they are easier to grift.

[-] ryrybang@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

The U.S. Constitution uses but does not define the phrase "natural born Citizen" and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its exact meaning.

Don't be too sure. This particular SC might allow Elon to run because...reasons. And by reasons, I mean free chartered flights anywhere in the world, brand new RVs, and paying rent for justices' mamas.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago

Thankfully, he can't run for president

Oh my God, thank Christ.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

Almost all "altruism" and "philanthropy" is just whitewashing/ego stroking some Capitalist's ill-begotten gains.

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago

Yep. He has an interview in a movie called Racing Extinction, and it was watching that that made me realise he only cares about money, he didn't do it to improve anything.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago

He only wrote that to improve image and sales.

Along this line of thought, what are the chances he’s being (more of) a right-wing chud in order to sell more of his stupid pickup truck?

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Low. He's a right wing chicken because of the tax cuts and all the other benefits the rich get from that party

[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 67 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I hope I live long enough to see Musk bankrupt

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 34 points 3 months ago

I'd love that, but the way our stupid society works I think it's literally impossible to lose that much wealth

[-] quant@leminal.space 8 points 3 months ago

He'll become the Edison from our era, and I'm just want to stop hearing his name.

[-] madjo@feddit.nl 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's probably too "woke" for Musk's new fanbase and he doesn't wanna look like he got hit by the "Woke Mind Virus".

Btw, I love the guys over at Edison Motors, who got fed up waiting for an all electric hauling truck, so they're retrofitting their own, under the slogan "Stealing Tesla's Ideas".

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

So long as we're talking about Tesla knockoffs, gotta love Nikola's attempt to fake it til they made it with absolutely no tech, rolling the prototype down a hill n hoping no one noticed.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

I noticed something stupid while on the interstate yesterday and passing or passed by multiple Teslas: they don't tell you which model they are on the back. If you see a Tesla you like and want to know which Tesla it is, I guess you'll have to figure that out for yourself.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

They only have 4 models (not counting the cyber dump truck) that are pretty easy to tell apart. Small sedan or big sedan, small SUV or big SUV. Then basically do they have a dual motor badge and is that badge underlined (or does it have a plaid logo on the back). There you go. Almost literally all the permutations of Teslas.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Ok, but letting people know what model of car they are looking at is just basic marketing.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

Do they need to market anymore than their name though? Marketing is getting you interested in the product. You say “oh that’s a nice Tesla” you go to the site and look from there most likely based on your budget.

(I am by no means a Tesla fan, frankly their build quality sucks) but I really don’t think that you need badges of every type plastered on a car.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Nope. Tesla is distinct enough that they don't need model badges. You know it's a Tesla, and they have very few models and model variations. Compare that to something like Toyota, who has 12 different models of sedan just in current production. There are quite a few more not in current production, but you'll still see them on the road.

[-] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

My understanding is that this is a deliberate choice, at least for Mercedes and BMW having their models be letters and numbers instead of memorable names. The idea is that all models seem closer together, kind of elevating them all.

Compared to when you look at an Accord and think this is the nice Honda, unlike the other not nice Honda. The implication is that all of the Mercedes ones should be nice.

But what do I fucking know. I like quirky weird cars, I like shitboxes, I’m one of those simultaneous fuckcars car guys (I hope I don’t need to explain how I can be in both camps at once?). I’m not the person any of these companies are marketing for.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Right, but they at least have those letters and numbers of the back of their car.

Unless you know which Tesla is the model 3, you won't know which model it is when you pass it or is passes you. You'll just know it was a Tesla. The back of a BMW i3 has a big "i3" on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Localhorst86@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago

My car doesn't have the model or engine size written on the back either, this is not exclusive to Tesla (although, depending on the make it might be an option to remove it when buying a car).

The manufacturer badge is usually enough, in my opinion. If you can't identify the model on the spot, as long as you can identify the brand and want to learn about the specific model you saw, you'll hit their website or dealership and identify it there. And with a brand like Tesla, that only has 5 fairly distinct models, it should be fairly easy to retroactively point out the model you saw - compared to a brand like BMW for example.

[-] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Which car apart from Tesla doesn’t have a model name badge? Just curious.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

I struggle with my own mortality, but reminded by this asshat why life limits are a good thing.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Climate traitor

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 11 points 3 months ago

Tesla is going to release an ICE car, i guarantee it

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

But the only thing they have going for them is the electric side of things. If you put a combustion engine in a cybertruck it has nothing left.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah... I doubt that.

There's just no reason to.

Why move backwards? Why give up the area where you have first mover advantage, making cars of the future, to instead try to compete with auto manufacturers who have been making that kind of car for the last eighty years. It's a losing proposition. It's not economical, it's not smart.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Well, for one thing, they've lost first mover advantage by squandering their lead. Every other company that makes an EV now makes one that works better, lasts longer and looks better than Tesla does. Besides which he's pandering to crowd that largely believes that their cock and balls will shrivel up and fall off if they purchase an electric vehicle.

Why move backwards? Why give up [...]

Why would you rebrand Twitter? You've got the largest and most recognizable website and logo on the internet, why would you want to scrap all that and start almost from scratch with a new name and nondescript logo that no one recognizes? First year marketing 101 tells you this is nearly the worst possible thing you can do with a recognized brand name.

Musk is most well known for bad business decisions. More than anything else he's done, he's famous for his ability to rampage through a previously functional company and burn it completely to the ground. Pivoting Tesla into creating an ICE vehicle is completely on brand for him.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Newest tesla will be run by using EXPLOSIONS!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Why does the whole world think Flanderization is a guide to be followed?

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I've never heard that word before so I had to look it up. Because obviously my first thought was Ned Flanders from The Simpsons.

For anyone like me here you go...

Flanderization is the process through which a complex fictional character's essential traits are oversimplified to the point where they constitute their entire personality, or at least exaggerated while other traits remain, over the course of a serial work.

[-] samokosik@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Well, not only those cars suck but also he starts to ignore the ecology part 🤷‍♂️

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Do they suck? Tesla is king when it comes to efficiency. I hate it, I'm in the market for EV and while I'm buying a car on paper of the same spec and at half price.... It is a worse car and I wish someone else did model 3 but not tesla.

Hopefully Lucid or Xiaomi (yes I'd sooner give money to them than Musk) come soon enough.

[-] seang96@spgrn.com 19 points 3 months ago

I prefer my cars with quality testing, hardware that is not consumer grade that lasts more than a year, and mechanical doors so if the battery dies after buckling a kid in the car seat they aren't trapped in the vehicle with the only option to smash the window. I'd love to live in fear with no guarantee the steering wheel won't fall off while I'm driving on the highway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] samokosik@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Well yes, especially when talking about reliability, they do not have very good scores.

They are just over complicated

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Dude still thinks the truck-o-sexuals are going to buy his car if he panders to the MAGAt crowd.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Manifesto LMAO, yeah he's exactly the type of toxic dude who thinks in Manifestos, like all the shooters and amok guys.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
738 points (98.6% liked)

News

23413 readers
1535 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS