-54
submitted 2 months ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

At some point voter shaming becomes less cope and more just straight up threatening minorities and trans people if we don't vote for their preferred flavor of genocide.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 15 points 2 months ago

I legitimately have no idea what point you're even trying to make.
But don't bother explaining.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

It's poking fun at how liberals compromise to their right, while punching left.

[-] jimrob4@midwest.social 10 points 2 months ago

Does it hurt being that stupid?

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 3 points 2 months ago

do you think the US president has control over whether or not a ceasefire happens on the other side of the planet

[-] tilefan@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

we've sent them something like 700 arms shipments since october? we usually sanction governments that are committing genocide, too.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Yes. The zionist entity is fully dependent on the US empire. Economically, militarily, geopolitically. If Biden said, "stop genocide or we will cut off all your aid and disavow you" they would have to stop either willingly or their neighbours would force them to.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

More naive than op.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, ask Reagan or Bush Sr who both controlled this rabid dog. You say you'll take away their weapons, they stop. It's a client state, not an ally as the relationship is by all measures entirely one-sided.

It's best to think of Israel as a 51st US state, and the president of the US ordering the war.

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago
[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 months ago

dotworld feds downvoting again

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Those downvotes glow more than female wrestler at a techno rave.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'd heard "everyone who disagrees with me is a bot" before, but I gotta say, "everyone who disagrees with me is an agent of the US federal government" is a new one.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It’s been happening since at least the 60’s. There’s no way to know.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

Easiest way to tell is when they're losing in the comments.

[-] Deestan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

If you were to give an estimate: How many of the people fundamentally disagreeing with you online are rational and honest people, and how many are US federal agents or in their employ? Percentage-wise.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I still have faith in humanity, so I’d say about 2%. Most are misinformed, some are trolling, some are probably bots. I don’t think there are as many intentionally bad actors as we’re led to assume. Good question though.

[-] Deestan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Thanks for answering! I was afraid it would be taken as sarcasm but I genuinely wanted to know.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
-54 points (31.2% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
1107 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS