147
submitted 1 week ago by JustMarkov@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Basically, what the title says. Do you use any app, that is proprietary, but either has no OSS alternatives or they're all not good enough? If there is an alternative, what keeps you from switching?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Head@lemmings.world 70 points 1 week ago
[-] THEWIZARD@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Not a chance lol but yeah they are a pain in the @ss with all their updates just way too many.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lemmy_eat_world@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago

Bitwarden. Most people think that their application is open source, but more and more of their code has shifted from the GPL/AGPL licensed code to code in their SDK, which is under a proprietary license. This led to their new Android app being disqualified from being hosted in F-Droid repos.

Keyguard was supposed to be an open source Bitwarden client, but the dev chose to use a custom proprietary license, so that is source available as well.

[-] THEWIZARD@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

KeePassDxX on F-Droid it also has export function, bit awkward you could call it, but it's a functioning password storage tool that's using local storage with your export and import options like to a file or cloud I think as well never used that but think it's there? It may lack some of the features of say Bitwarden though because I have never used Bitwarden.

[-] lascapi@jlai.lu 18 points 1 week ago

Oh!! I didn't know that … :/

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

Well fuck me.

[-] snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

I've been a paying bitwarden customer for years but i through they were moving more towards free software and not away from it... Makes me consider quitting my subscription. Why do they do this?

[-] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Vaultwarden ?

Edit: Nvm, that's just the server part

[-] lemmy_eat_world@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That's actually a good point too: Vaultwarden is fully open source. The official Bitwarden server also has proprietary components.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 week ago

Pedantic, but Google Messages' RCS. And it's all Google's fault because they are holding the API hostage, probably because they want to create familiarity with the app so that people don't switch once they finally open up.

[-] lemmy_eat_world@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Not pedantic at all. Google lied about RCS being an open standard.

The pedantic point would be saying that RCS, the protocol, is technically open, but the specific implementation that Google is pushing and being adopted is proprietary 🤓

So yeah. Totally fair point and fuck Google for their RCS bait-and-switch.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 36 points 1 week ago

Google Pay/Wallet

Right now tap and pay is completely and hopelessly corporate

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

The issue is that the digital tap-to-pay cards are actually reissued cards with their own unique numbers. They also require significant security measures to protect from cloning attacks.

So banks need a party that they can safely issue a digital card to, knowing that the card data will be stored safely.

Even a FOSS app that covers all the user's needs is going to have a lot of trouble actually getting a card loaded into it under current standards.

I hate to say it, but crypto wallets are likely the closest thing we're ever going to get to a FOSS tap-to-pay system. Banks are inherently corporate and capitalist, so it's not really in their nature to make things open source.

Perhaps if there were an industry standard for issuing digital cards, instead of banks partnering with centralized wallet apps, we could procure our own digital cards to load onto our phones and watches, or integrate into other devices. But that's a whole other battle that nobody is fighting right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 week ago
[-] infeeeee@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago

MicroG works really well

A free-as-in-freedom re-implementation of Google’s proprietary Android user space apps and libraries.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

MicroG works well if you let it leak some data to Google.

I would like a free-as-in-free-from-Google Google Play Services reimplementation that lets me use any app that depends on it without hitting any Google server.

[-] infeeeee@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

OP asked about Open Source not about privacy.

MicroG minimises connections to google servers, here you can read what addresses it still connects to and why: https://github.com/microg/GmsCore/wiki/Google-Network-Connections

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Dating apps.

We need an open source completely free dating app.

No paying for matches, no limits ...just they're in your town, you look at their photos, you can talk, anyone can block anyone.

[-] fossphi@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

I don't really care for online dating, but I remember coming across this. They claimed to be open source.

https://alovoa.com/?lang=en

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] superkret@feddit.org 20 points 1 week ago

A keyboard with swipe typing, multilingual autocorrect and speech to text support that actually works.

Other than that, my only proprietary apps are from commercial services I use and pay for (banking, Spotify, Carsharing and public transport). I'd love for them to become open source, but it's probably not ever gonna happen, cause they rely on verifying my identity.

[-] Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

I've had a good experience with HeliBoard

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] enix@reddthat.com 16 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure if this fits but here is mine:

I want to get away from Samsung but the "Sound Assistant" app let's me control the volume of every app, kind of like a mixer. Sometimes an app doesn't have a mute option, I can set the volume of that app to 0 without effecting the volume of whatever music I'm listening to.

I also like to listen to my local police scanner and music at the same time. I can set the volume of the scanner app low enough to not really bother the music but loud enough that if something happens I can still hear it and pause the music.

I can't believe Samsung and their app is the only way, but I haven't found an alternative.

[-] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

My Motorola has it built into the sound settings so you should be able to find other alternatives

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] SaveMotherEarthEDF@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

There are so many. By usage however:

Smart Audiobook Player: None of the apps I tried had all the features in one, like reading my complex audiobooks folder structure and auto grouping the books based on that. Timer to pause audiobook that is automatically reset by moving the phone.

Maps: No foss solutions work better where I live than GMaps

YTMusic: So this is a tough one to beat because of the nature of the platform itself.

Notes: I am looking for a P2P syncable note app that can also have a web interface or atleast a Linux version of the App. Allows drawing your notes on an android phone or tablet using stylus, and other usual features. Can also use cloud storage as a backup or sync source. I know this one is a really tall order.

[-] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

OSMAnd works really well. For YTMusic, you can instead pick LibreTube and use it in music player mode.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

I'll mention organic maps and rimusic.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Darohan@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

Symfonium. There are plenty of music apps, and I've used a lot of them, but none combine the UX and functionality that Symfonium offers to anywhere near the same quality :/

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Mazesecle@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Tasker: I haven't used it, but I've seen useful automations over the years from people online and I would probably use a good FOSS alternative.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

File Manager Plus:

It connects to all my SFTP servers effortlessly, and it's an absolutely stellar file Manager.

JuiceSSH:

Manages all my SSH servers and identities, and has an extremely usable terminal. It's got extensions too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Nova launcher.

I Haven't found one that works so well with KLWP or has good app drawer organization. I like having folders and tabs to split everything up. Having one big list of apps (70% I dont use often and another 10% bloat) isn't useful.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] sga@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Whatsapp. I know signal, simplex, matrix, (a billion other things), etc exist that are much better, but where I live, no one uses them, for context, basically everyone, like if you have a phone, you use whatsapp, some government things even happen through whatsapp bots, when people say the word message here, they mean whatsapp. There are about 20-30% (among younger folks) who use telegram, but that is mostly for easier piracy, and larger file sharing (before whatsapp allowed 2 GiB, now they do it habitually). My mom has about a 1000 contacts, and less than 10 of them actually use signal (there are many more who signed up(there was another thing, basically when elon said "just use signal"))

At this point it is not worth getting everyone to switch, the best i have done, is just reducing the number people i communicate with (on whatsapp), and try to just meet in person

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ronflex@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Honestly, Google Keep notes. Trilium server runs as a UWA on Android but it's pretty ass. And things like Obsidian are way too much for something me and my (non-technical) SO use to share notes

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago

People have hit on most of them here, but here is another big one:

Fitness apps. Mainly calorie tracking, workout tracking and heart rate tracking

Health app

Sleep as Android

(No, gadget bridge is not a replacement for 99% of cases and doesn't even support the gold standard for heart rate tracking, polar H10)

For calorie tracking, the massive food databases required, barcode scanning, and crowd sourcing are generally not compatible with the open source community's privacy ideals. OpenNutriTracker has promise though!

For workout tracking, none of them have any device support and most of them are dead and abandoned. Not to mention heart rate zones, stats and training trends, etc... FitoTrack and Opentracks are good starts though.

And then a google fit alternative. Something that can integrate sleeping, workouts, heart rates, sensors, etc.. Data all in one aggregates place. It is a huge task and it makes sense that there is no open source alternative for it. Especially when the components aren't individually there to aggregate.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 9 points 1 week ago

Tasker, because there's no alternative.

MiXplorer (file manager), because even if not counting the features that should be a different app, it's much better than material files.

[-] anzo@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago

OpenCamera is good, but could do better. But I'd say video editing is the biggest void.

Also, gesture typing keyboards are an empty niche of foss alternatives. HelioBoard requires loading some proprietary blob unfortunately.

I guess the most heavy machine learning use cases are not filled in.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Poweramp

There's nothing else out there that's really an equal, foss or not. The closest it gets is neutron, and that's a hot mess of an app.

It's the sound quality that's standout. It doesn't hurt that it's a decent player in every other way too, but even apps built for audiophiles don't match it in real use, in every situation.

None of the foss players are worth a damn sound wise; might as well use whatever comes with the device on that factor alone.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
147 points (98.7% liked)

Open Source

30263 readers
34 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS