Heck even if they don't find life it'll be interesting to find out how dimethyl sulphide might be getting produced there
Very true
I don't mean to brag, but I naturally produce sulphides in high concentrations after I eat lots of broccoli.
JWST is able to analyse the light that passes through the faraway planet's atmosphere. That light contains the chemical signature of molecules in its atmosphere. The details can be deciphered by splitting the light into its constituent frequencies - rather like a prism creating a rainbow spectrum. If parts of the resulting spectrum are missing, it has been absorbed by chemicals in the planet's atmosphere, enabling researchers to discover its composition.
That is pretty wild.
Spectroscopy is a really interesting tool
If it's confirmed, it will be the biggest news in history.
Just look at the evidence
I think it'll at least deserve a gold star, not silver.
Sadly, I think you overestimate the general interest there would be in such an announcement. Also, it is not as though we will be getting images of little green aliens, any evidence will be far more circumstantial, tentative and over many years. It will be hard to sustain any public excitement for that long.
Both of you are right. The general public will give this a passing interest at best since it's not roswell greys or some shit... but this would still be the biggest news in history if confirmed. As far as "big scientific questions still unanswered" goes, actual confirmation of extraterrestrial life existing is only 1 tier of holy-shitness down, imo, from things like fully understanding consciousness or dark matter.
For most of history humanity thought we were alone, and even now(or till now if this is confirmed I guess) the "official" stance is still only "there's no evidence but the universe is so incomprehensibly large there probably is something, y'know, somewhere. Maybe."
“Possible microbial life hundreds of light years away” isn’t nearly as fun as “They’re here and they have infinite energy devices.”
Don’t think we’ll ever be able to “confirm” it the same way we can confirm if there’s/was life on Mars, Venus, Europa, etc.
It’s just too far away
JWST has only operated for less than 2 years and already provides so much data. I can't wait for more discoveries.
The coolest part is the things it’s now opening time on the Hubble up for.
Like.
JWST is no doubt amazing, but let’s not discount the amazing data Hubble is still churning out…. Because everyone wants the best.
Too bad it’s 9 times the size of the earth (I don’t know what it’s mass is) so likely not suitable for humans. Still finding life outside earth would be absolutely incredible, and I agree, the most historic discovery of humankind
I tried Googling and found nothing. Does anyone know if DMS has been detected on Europa or Ganymede?
I think we would have heard about it.
I think they foud it in Venus' atmosphere a year or so ago.
The was Phosphine
I'm assuming even there is some on an icy moon of the solar system, since they don't have an atmosphere we can't detect it as easily.
We did it fellas. We found the space fart.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.