122
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago
[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 16 points 1 day ago

Because Apple is releasing the film.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Sounds like a weird "we'll finance you but you're going to have to agree to our wacko conditions" kind of deal.

Odd that he found nobody else. Or maybe he found the challenge interesting.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Next summer’s horror blockbuster is the biggest release yet to be shot with iPhones—and not even Apple’s latest model.

But iPhone 15 is the latest model? The 16 Series is still the future model, until people can actually get them. And they even say that principal filming has wrapped in August further down.

[-] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

wait was the 15 the one that was made of titanium and that was it

[-] classic@fedia.io 23 points 1 day ago

Crap. If I hope this doesn't mean motion sickness inducing shaky cam filming

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 day ago

With the gear on the picture in the article it seems like they stabilized the iPhone like you would any ordinary camera too.

... but there was also mention of action cameras strapped to farm animals, so I'm a bit torn.

[-] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That was exactly my first thought too

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

I'm glad they mentioned the release dates in the article because for a second there I was about to look up when "28 Weeks Later" came out to see if this mad lad waited 28 years to make the next movie. It came out in 2007 so it's been 17 years. For some reason I felt like it was so much older than I remember, but it would have come out when I was a toddler if they did release it 28 years ago.

... Anyway. I'm stoked to see the movie.

[-] dunz@feddit.nu 26 points 1 day ago

The first in the series, 28 Days Later, came out in 2002 actually

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

True. I was comparing it to the second for some reason. But still, only 22 years and I'm just dumb. :)

[-] 1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Why is there no 28 Months Later?

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Because they didn't make one.
And the reason this one isn't 28 months later is because it's heck of a lot easier to make the 48 year old Cillian Murphy look like a convincing 54-year old than a 28 year old.

[-] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Because it wasn't filmed by an Instagram mom with a toddler.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Is this a big deal? Tons of movies have been shot with consumer camcorders which are probably worse than a modern phone camera.

[-] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Maybe? Depends on how it's used and if it looks good. Maybe they chose it because it looks a bit shit.

The Creator garnered some attention because it looked great while being shot on a relatively inexpensive camera. I do think people would be really surprised at what you'd get with a gimbal mounted cellphone with a 360° camera in terms of special effects integration, but this might not be their route.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I looked at the article and it turns out the phones are in humongous housings with cine lenses. So not shot with phones in the way it might sound. Citizenfour (2013 best documentary Oscar) was mostly shot with a Sony FS-100 camcorder (2K HD I'm pretty sure) that the filmmaker carried in her purse.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Boyle is probably the biggest name to hop on the digital hype train early on, so this isn't super shocking.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Those early digital years were brutal. 28 Days Later looks worse with every passing year, probably never fixable (the cam's resolution and quality was just too low).

Edit: Wow, it was shot in SD 480 for some reason (I thought the cam was capable of HD 720). Fantastic article, full of tech details.

[-] magikmw@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

But it was cheap, they even could afford the Oppenheimer actor back then.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Couldn't even use a 16 Pro?

/s

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Dude, read the article. Iphone 16 wasn't even released 28 years ago, let alone the pro.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

For anyone curious:

the particular model used to shoot was the iPhone 15 Pro Max. (Evidently, filming took place too early for Boyle and Mantle to get their hands on the new iPhone 16 series.)

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

It was a joke

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
122 points (89.1% liked)

Technology

58164 readers
3547 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS