48
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

I wasted 6 hours arguing with a libertarian. But I did succeed in arguing him into submission, where he started accepting that his worldview is wrong. His only defense of himself is that "I haven't read anything about objectivism, I think they might prove property rights and markets there..."

I should probably get a real life.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 23 points 8 months ago

It is very funny to me that you ran into a libertarian so malformed that they haven't even read Rand. Where they a Rothbardian, a Hoppean, or did they get their political "education" from memes?

[-] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 24 points 8 months ago

He claimed to be both Rothbardian and Hoppean. While exclusively invoking John Locke's conception of property. Really confidently incoherent.

[-] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 19 points 8 months ago

probably youtube radicalized. He tried to back his arguments by citing bullshit youtube videos.

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 19 points 8 months ago

This may come off a little "doomer", and I don't mean it to, but I think we at a point right now where there's really not that many reachable people left in the west. I've noticed over the years that the mean age of actual leftists in the west seems to remain about my age for all the time I've been a leftist. I think we had a surge at a particular point in time when I was around 22 and most of the new "leftists" post that are actually just Succs.

I've sorta just matt-grillin since cuz I don't think the material base to form an actual socialist movement exists in most of the west right now, so I don't waste time trying to convert anyone because the best I can make them is a vaushite. Now, I'm actually MORE optimistic for the future now on a global level but I've accepted there's not gonna be any socialism in my backyard.

[-] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 10 points 8 months ago

I don't think that I have really fully turned this person around, and I am not advocating people do the same. I think this guys beliefs being so incoherent means that there is a very slim chance he reconsiders things. I am just acknowledging that I wasted 6 hours and trying to hope that it wasn't totally wasted.

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 17 points 8 months ago

I think that's the opposite conclusion you should come to. If his ideology is an incoherent mess, that's more a sign that he has no interest is forming a coherent ideology and just wants politics to validate his vibes about the world. He will likely always be incoherent because he has no interest in coherence. If anything I've seen more success changing people who could actually articulate some sensible logic to their misguided beliefs, it shows they have some actual interest in logic.

[-] m532@hexbear.net 14 points 8 months ago

Arguing a libertarian into submission is almost impossible, so rat-salute-2

[-] citrussy_capybara@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago

“don’t have anything concrete to back any of this up, and refuse to do any reading on the subject, but nothing will stop the regurgitation of unexamined ideas upon the world”
freeze-peach is a disease vector that needs proper precautions, but libs will continue to plaguerat both fancy-rona and fascist ideology

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13922 readers
792 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS