74
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

No, no, just no. The US has no business supporting a genocidal religious war.

[-] Phineaz@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago

It's an anti-missile system. To shoot down incoming missiles.

[-] actually@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

At this point it will only cause more terror.

The one thing keeping Israel from stopping is complete invulnerability.

It would be good to want some people there to be as safe as possible . But more people would be safe, in the whole region, more overall would live, and be healthy and safe, if there were actual flaws in defense systems.

[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Cause more terror how exactly?

Its easy to stay in power as a war mongering despot if you have a more powerful country cleaning up all your mistakes. We sanction Russia and say its to encourage regime change, then say things like Bibi has gone to far then give him aide, the opposite of sanctions. If he had to answer for his own mistakes his people may not have canceled their general strike after one day.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

After reading the article a better title would be: ‘US to send THAAD anti-missile system and 100 troops to operate it’

[-] JoMomma@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago
[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Anti missle systems and people managing them?

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Why not send them to everyone?

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

-"What about..."

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
74 points (95.1% liked)

News

23150 readers
3671 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS