60
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by vovo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/news@lemmy.world
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

How... what.... why? Why is the whole article not telling us why the FBI is doing this? That is a key question to understand if that is a serious threat or government suppression. Also, why on earth would you post these pictures on your own account.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 8 points 4 weeks ago

Wait you want to hear the FBI's version of why people who film factory farms should be charged with attempted use of WMDs?

Probably the FBI is not willing to explain why they want to pretend that exposing illegal animal cruelty is the same thing as planning a mustard gas attack.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Nobody is charged with anything. They are documenting things. I would like to know why to make my judgement on whether that is reasonable or bullshit.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

The FBI straight up said they were looking to bring those charges. Not having done so yet is not a defense.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Their rationale, from the article:

The bureau has floated the idea of charging animal rights activists under a statute prohibiting biological weapons, a subtype of WMD, the records show. This may include toxins, viruses, and microorganisms used to deliberately spur death and disease.

Marceau described this focus on agroterrorism as an effort to pin blame on activists for the rampant disease outbreaks on factory farms.

I find this hard to believe it would fly in court. Unless it's true of course, which seems unlikely. Animal rights activists releasing a disease to kill livestock (and maybe start a pandemic) seems illogical, but not everything animal rights extremists (if that's what these people are) do is always logical.

It could just be the FBI gathering intelligence in an area they expect violent extremists to arise. Same way you might track militia activity. Doesn't make a ton of sense to me but the FBI has had a big fear of animal rights activists doing extremists shit for a long time.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

They're doing it because someone called their representative and asked them to bring it up with the DOJ.

[-] lostinfog@reddthat.com -1 points 4 weeks ago

This just sounds like another propaganda piece from the intercept

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
60 points (90.5% liked)

News

23296 readers
1308 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS