230
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

Extremely not-fun fact: collectively, humanity currently produces more than enough food for every person. But a huge part of it is either wasted or inaccessible by people that need them, which usually results in them not going to anyone and being wasted, which is why we still have food scarcity.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 115 points 1 year ago

Food isn't scarce. It's just poorly distributed.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Food isn’t even poorly distributed. Almost everybody eats, and the only places people don’t eat it’s from other people with weapons actively preventing them from getting food, and actively preventing others from bringing it to them.

I’ve been homeless in America, twice. Both times I had all the food I could eat, as soon as I was willing to accept it.

The first time I relied on strangers and I ate like a king. The people of Cambridge MA just straight up gave me more food than I could eat when I asked.

The second time I stayed in a shelter in Denver. I had three square meals a day available to me, though I only ate dinner since my job didn’t permit me to attend the other meals. It was good food, donated and prepared by volunteers.

I am sick of people trying to perpetuate the myth that we have starvation in America. It’s one area we succeed in beyond the wildest dreams of anyone even 50 years ago, but haters just can’t stop hating on our society.

We feed people. We feed them extremely well.

[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

9 million people starve to death every year

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Globally, not solely in the US.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, and only when people with guns are actively preventing them from getting food, and actively preventing others from bringing it to them.

[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

First of all, that means food is poorly distributed. You are just disputing the cause.

And yes, conflict if a major cause of hunger. But what is a major cause of conflict? Fucking poverty. Al Qaeda doesn't recruit from fucking Beverly Hills. Another major cause: US intervention, for the sake of profit and geopolitical dominance, with the dominance ultimately also being for the sake of profit. The world economic system functions as a huge siphon that extracts wealth from the global south and funnels it to wealthy countries where the major institutions of finance are located. Western financial instruments like the IMF and World Bank, alongside direct political and economic pressure, enforce austerity in poor nations, dismantle social safety nets, depress wages, and privatize resources, and this very predictably results in underdevelopment and poverty, which fucking benefits the west because lower wages mean larger profit margins, lower prices and greater market share for the western companies that source their labor there. It's a fucking global sweatshop economy. And there are consequences to this, when everyone is fucking poor and uneducated and young men see no future for themselves except to become soldiers. It means conflict, which means starvation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

It’s actually efficiently distributed, to where the profit is

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Nothing efficient about throwing away food. Not even from a profit perspective.

[-] blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

That depends. If discarding food costs $X and distributing it to another market costs $2X guess which option is economically favourable?

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only reason that would occur would be inefficiency in distribution of product.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] hudson@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

In many cases, it’s not that, either.

[-] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, hard to truck food when the roads are in bad shape, especially since food can go bad easily.

Logistics are harder than many people think.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

There are unmet food needs in our world. Too much so. But I’m not sure I would say, overall, “food is very scarce.”

[-] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Yep, I would hazard a guess the amount of food waste alone could easily feed everybody but something something profits

[-] JDubbleu@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

It's entirely a logistic issue. African countries are insanely difficult to traverse. You can have all the food in the world but we don't have a way to move the food to everyone.

[-] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I've literally worked in logistics for 20+ years, you can send shit anyway, it just comes down to cost and profits

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Under capitalism, food isn’t produced to eat but to make profits. When it’s not profitable to sell, they will rather dump foods, starving the people rather than to plainly donate.

We produce enough foods to feed the entire population. But the sole purpose of food is to not feed the people, but to feed the greed of the producers, the farmers, the corporates.

Capitalism created an artificial scarcity of food where we produce too much food for the obese and throw the rest away to rot in front of the poor.

[-] Deuces@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

In general yeah, but let's not blame the farmers. They're shit on from so many directions it's wild - they're often locked into deals with specific companies with contracts that can sometimes cost them more money than they make. Tyson is especially notorious for this, requiring the farmers to build specific chicken houses that the farmer pays for, on land that the farmer pays for to raise chickens they're only allowed to sell to Tyson, all while Tyson can and regularly does choose not to buy the chickens if they're not selling enough. Farmers have managed to find themselves indentured servants on their own land.

[-] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

It's not really scarce. If you know the amount that's thrown away

[-] hudson@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

And where and exactly when

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

Food is far from scarce in the developed world. There's so much food that people can easily become obese, and millions of tons of food are destroyed each year.

[-] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Uhhh, yeah, no idea where the "food is scarce" came from, we've got so much food in developed countries that we could easily feed the whole world with it.

There's a lot to be said for encouraging self sufficiency. See the damage done to African textile industries from a glut of charity clothing.

Of course, in an industrial age "encouraging self sufficiency" also means making competition, and a lot of dummies start talking about bootstraps instead of supporting education and investment.

[-] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Not easily, nor safely. Most food waste is from retail and Healthcare. It's very hard to repurpose that already consumed scrap for others to eat. Let alone ship it across the world.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Food grows on trees if your ancestors planted and cared for those trees. An apple tree that's been uncared-for for fifty years may produce nothing but nasty bug-ridden rotting inedible fruit.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Fruit trees been around longer than we have, they can care for themselves

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Not the cultivated fruit trees that have been selectively bred by humans for thousands of years, no.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they grow just fine. I dont know what you think they cant get without human care

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hudson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

This also falls apart when you check out the price of apples lately. :(

[-] kn33@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago
[-] puppy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Literally the first thing that came to my mind after reading the post title.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

obligatory grapes of wrath quote

The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.

[-] OpenStars@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Bold of you to assume that "that side" can / will read.

(\s btw, as I'm sure you guessed but others may not have so... just in case:-D)

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago

Upon learning American dollars are made from cotton:

"Money doesn't grow on trees!"

"No, but it grows on a bush!"

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Turn of phrase DESTROYED by FACTS and LOGIC

[-] roo@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

More crops go to feed in animal agriculture, than crops to humans. And farmers tend to monocrop instead of utilising all the possible crops that would do well in that environment. (Retooling, investment, skills, time, industry experts, ...)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
230 points (84.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

29816 readers
220 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS