185
submitted 2 days ago by kalkulat@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net

" ... as soon as vehicles come in the right price range next year … people will flock to buy them.”

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

China's ultra cheap EVs are subcompacts that are extremely well suited to small batteries to keep them cheap. Small batteries can work for EVs if there is good charging infrastructure. Europe, being densely populated, is suited to having good charging infrastructure on heavily used highways, and "drive through small towns" which have cafes and restaurants suited to recharging at EU life pace.

EU/French car history is ultra well suited to small cars, where cities have narrow streets, and affordability has always been popular.

EVs with small batteries, even in EU/US, can be built cheaper than ICE vehicles by domestic brands. Battery costs are falling everywhere, but licensing/importing Chinese tech to bringing battery costs down, is path to domestic EV industry success/growth. EU is especially vulnerable to geopolitical oil extortion, from both friends and foes.

[-] LastWish@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

So they could have done it all along?

[-] Breve@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago

Yup, also American automakers get plenty of subsidies and bailouts from the government too. It was always about not wanting to make electric cars. 🤷

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

That’s what the environment needed. More people buying more cars. I bet the floor mats are 100% recycled.

[-] yonder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Electric vehicles are peddled as some sort of cure to climate change when they are only a bit better than gasoline cars since they still need the massive amount of infrastructure needed for cars. I stilk think that people buying an electric car when their gasoline car breaks is reasonable enough if other transport options are unavailible. But our focus should be on making those other options of transport both availible and reasonable rather than focusing on a specific drive train technology.

[-] DerArzt@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Now do the US!

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

In Europe. I doubt we will get any of these in North America.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 days ago

We'll take our expensive luxury EVs with 2 miles a charge and like them...er I mean buy giant pickup trucks instead that use 20 gallons of gas / mile while the world burns.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 days ago

With all the batteries being made in China, it will be very hard to compete on a level ground.

[-] sheogorath@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Don't worry; Indonesia has a lot of nickel that has plunged the nickel prices around the world, which will certainly decrease the cost of making batteries since the mines are owned by... China. Ahh fuck.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

the cheapest battery chemistry, used in most affordable EVs, uses no nickel or cobalt. "Race"/premium EVs still want to use that type of battery, though

[-] earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

The only reason they are cheaper is because of the super high import taxes of Chinese EV.

I hope China starts to build giga factories in Europe, so we get cheap and good products, instead of that French crap.

[-] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] khaleer@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 day ago

Yeah for sure, china and "good products" do not go well together.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Not true, you get what you pay for. Western companies make purchases from manufacturers and once it sells well they nickel and dime their suppliers. So when they say it must be cheaper, the manufacturer sais yes.. and they replace a metal holder with a plastic once painted chrome.. to lower the price as requested. This is how it works.

[-] urandom@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Surprisingly, the China-made Tesla Model 3s tend to be of exceptional quality, whereas the US-made ones are not

[-] earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Someone is stuck in the 90‘

You know, lots of things have changed since then. Also, please check how many items in your household are made in China. You will be surprised how good their quality is, compared to the things you can buy for no money on AliExpress or Temu.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee -5 points 1 day ago

You do realize that they only produce cheap shit for mainly americans to buy. They are exceptional craftsmen, but they keep the good stuff.

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

As someone who has lived in China, no that's not the case. Of course Chinese people can and do make high quality things, but there is a huge amount of incredibly poor quality stuff at all levels. As an example the floor of the flat I lived in fell through into the (thankfully empty) flat below two years after I left it, the building was less than 15 years old.

Partially its because of the real lack of regulatory oversight in China and partially because of a cultural sense of "ends justify the means" when it comes to business ethics.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

Oh no. Stop. Please. /s

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

So, when will the huge tariffs on EU-made electric cars start?

[-] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

What do you mean? Why would Europe impose tariffs on their own cars?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Europe wouldn't. The US would. I'm one of those US-centric users everyone gripes about, it would seem.

[-] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

I don't think the US would either. Their justification for tariffs on Chinese cars was that they were uncompetitively cheap due to subsidies. Doubt EU is gonna subsidize cars, at least as heavily as China.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Their justification for tariffs on Chinese cars was that they were uncompetitively cheap due to subsidies.

This is mostly a lie. EU placed smaller/fairer tariffs based on those subsidy allegations, but in US, all politicians are devoted to oil oligarchy profits. 100% EV tariffs and 50% solar tariffs, 25% battery and ebike tariffs are all about protecting oil, instead of small domestic solar industry. Global warming is a lower priority than war, or making sure existing and new oligarchs have plenty of profits to fund politicians with.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Their justification for tariffs on Chinese cars was that they were uncompetitively cheap due to subsidies.

That was the justification, yes.

[-] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

Whether you agree or not with their justification (or think that it's not the real reason), they clearly have no justifications (or reasons) to impose tariffs on unsubsidized (or at least not as heavily subsidized) EU cars.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[-] abfarid@startrek.website 0 points 1 day ago

The oil lobby wouldn't be specifically against cars from another region, they are against electric vehicles in general, whether they are produced domestically or otherwise. The primary benefactors from the tariffs are the US electric car manufacturers, who would lose profit over not being able to compete with subsidized cars. They are probably the ones who lobbied for them.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The oil lobby wouldn’t be specifically against cars from another region, they are against electric vehicles in general, whether they are produced domestically or otherwise.

They're against inexpensive electric vehicles.

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 0 points 2 days ago
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Nobody should be excited for a race to the bottom, but cars generally have been overpriced and this seems like a pretty normal trend of price correction trying to take shape in this wonky market.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
185 points (97.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5158 readers
588 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS