175
submitted 3 weeks ago by lgsp@feddit.it to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

This is really a big step in my opinion, as language choices can shape opinions, as the article states "a ‘significant step forward’ in recognizing the preventable nature of road collisions."

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 107 points 3 weeks ago

"Why don't we use the word accident again?"

"Because accident implies there's no-one to blame."

[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

I got into an "on purpose"

[-] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

Accident also requires that you are making a good faith attempt to prevent said accident

[-] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 52 points 3 weeks ago

in UK

Now they call it an "oopsie whoopsie automobiley dealy"

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 36 points 3 weeks ago

The official new word is "collision".

Also "accident" is being phased out in recognition of the fact that crashes should be prevented, not considered an unavoidable or acceptable downside of automobile use.

Accident implies there is no culpability.

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 weeks ago

I think the poster was making a joke based on this image (or similar ones):

[-] dufkm@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

The official new word is “collision”.

Oopsie, I just had a collision in my underwear.

[-] arin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

There goes the automobile industry's last bits of influence on the public at minimizing the mechanical death machines

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[-] arin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 weeks ago

Huh? You are genuinely claiming that the word "accident" was the only remaining lever capital had to influence the public??

[-] essell@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

In your head, is the whole country Mr Bean?

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No, there's also the violent mobs with no teeth but only literally, the queen(?) and mold

[-] essell@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So long as you have a balanced and fair view

PS. Its spelt mould, ignorant colonist

[-] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well, there are Mrs Beans too, I'm sure.

[-] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

“Collision” is the word. While most of them aren’t intentional, very few of them are unavoidable. See, e.g., the lady who passed me on a double yellow blind curve on a 25mph residential road in front of a school, only to stop next to me at the red light 50ft down the street

[-] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Good. There is nothing accidental about the horrible way people drive and the utter disregard for other's lives that they display behind the wheel. Cars are a horrible way of getting around but people's bad driving makes things so much worse than they need to be.

My dad and I have jokingly been calling them "intentionals" for a while now.

[-] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

The police in the UK have called them "road traffic incidents" for at least 15 years now

[-] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Incident still sounds too close to accident. I vote we call it "consequences".

[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

negligence is a good word

[-] dufkm@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I like that, and then we can grade the consequences as Code Brown, Code Yellow, Code Red.

[-] GiveOver@feddit.uk 6 points 3 weeks ago

Casually everybody will obviously carry on saying "accident" for now, but I wonder how fast it will filter down from official language to every day language. Would be interesting to watch the trend over the next few decades. Like how people still say "road tax".

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

He said: “Most crashes are not ‘accidents’ but are avoidable, normally by drivers and other road users paying more attention.”

And to take it a step further, some blame should be cast on the peoole who design roads to be as dangerous as they are.

You can design a road that effectively forces drivers to both pay attention and drive more slowly.

But since roads aren't designed with safety in mind, you get far too many "accidents"🙄

[-] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

But can we change this to "attempted murder"? Cars are weapons and should be banned/regulated as such.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
175 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9629 readers
196 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS