56
submitted 9 hours ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 25 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That was a good read. I haven’t watched the documentary or kept up with this, but the part

Len Sassaman, a cryptographer who moved in similar online circles as Satoshi, as the most likely candidate to be revealed as the Bitcoin creator. Sassaman took his own life in 2011 at the age of 31, shortly after Satoshi disappeared.

seems pretty strongly like the guy to me though. Hopefully the documentary goes into that?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 42 points 8 hours ago

Being labeled as Satoshi Nakamoto is basically a fucking death sentence due to how much money is on the line. It feels deeply irresponsible of HBO.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 hours ago

Very likely not him, and he's like the 20th candidate whose been paraded by the news

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 4 points 8 hours ago

Sorry, why is it a death sentence?

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago

He potentially has billions of dollars in bitcoin

Bad people do bad things for big sums of money

[-] Bob_Robertson_IX@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

But ... there are other billionaires out there who are not going into hiding because they are billionaires.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Other billionaires also have security. The accused people who aren't really Satoshi likely don't have the means to properly protect themselves the same way.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 hours ago

Satoshi could liquidate 4.76% of all the bitcoins that will ever exist, that would wipe the crypto market and potentially bring the stock market along for a very bumpy ride, wipe a ton of money in pension funds and so on.

The fact that one person owns that much Bitcoin should worry anyone who is invested in it.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago

Yes but having billions in Bitcoin more closely resembles having billions in cash than billions in stocks / other assets which are harder to steal and get away with.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 hours ago

Ironically, that's the kind of "issue" you need trustworthy banks for. The thing crypto was meant to replace. But none of the crypto exchanges that exist are trustworthy enough

[-] Sabin10@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

I still don't understand why crypto exchanges exist is an unregulated, decentralized currency, wouldn't an exchange remove part of those benefits?

[-] ryan213@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago

I still don't know what Bitcoin is.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Bitcoin was the very first solution to how do you prevent a digital item from being copied and used repeatedly aka double spending.

Nothing digital was truly safe from this until bitcoin as you always had to trust someone who could double spend or steal it if they wanted to, or the database/system being hacked and things altered.

Things became truly immutable once committed to the chain.

The whole system needed an incentive to keep everyone aligned to reject double spends, and the coin itself was the reward. (Edit and there's a limited number of coins, making them scarce)

Miners get rewarded for ensuring transactions are legitimate. It costs money to gain the reward so it's better for them to just keep the reward instead of risking losing it

Edit: it also created the first time we could prove something digital existed at a point in time. Everything before this involved trusting someone data wasn't altered to 'prove' it. Since blocks are immutable, their timestamp proves something existed then. E.g. a hash of a picture. It's irrefutable the picture existed on that day.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

You know the blockchain, right? Basically, whenever anyone trades a bitcoin, that transaction is recorded on the blockchain. And there's a bunch of math work that goes into recording each transaction. When people do this math work, they get rewarded with a tiny bit of a bitcoin. This is what mining is. So then you have some bitcoin. And some other people accept bitcoin for goods and services.

Bitcoin itself is a virtual currency, just like Runescape gold or the dollars in your online bank account. It's just numbers on a computer. The blockchain part is what makes it different.

Now don't get me wrong, for the majority of applications this is overkill and not at all useful. Bitcoin and blockchains are solutions looking for a problem.

[-] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 23 points 8 hours ago

A confidence game too many people believe in

[-] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

A way to milk money from people who don't understand how computers work.

[-] philpo@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago

And to snuggle large amounts of wealth in and out of china.

[-] miseducator@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That darn cuddly Chinese money! Just wanna caress it all night long!

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Xi dressed as Charmin bear

[-] philpo@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago

Lol. Okay. I leave that typo. Just for that answer it is worth it.

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 hours ago

Your typo makes it sound like they're doing something terribly cute!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 8 hours ago

"Money" that's only used to buy drugs or try to get rich quick.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I believe its him. His interview was hilariously awkward and cagey.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
56 points (91.2% liked)

News

23207 readers
3476 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS