229
Oh then why’s he throwing so much money at Moreno?
Fuck off and die
HEY MCONNEL REMEMBER WHEN YOU RATFUCKED THE COURTS YEAH I REMEMBER
Broken clock etc.
Mitch still won't vote against the orange doofus.
In case anyone was wondering, this article makes abundantly clear that McConnell is (still) nearly as big a bag of shit as Trump is. He is a loathsome, worthless human being who deserves nothing but contempt. If I got to be president and had a congressional majority the first fucking thing I would do is put two new members on the SC to nullify the two illegitimate members that were put on the bench thanks to this fucking turd.
I remember hearing him ramble on about how he couldn’t stand that a Democratic representative went over their time (allowed by whoever was leading) by THREE MINUTES in 1987 and he held a grudge over it for thirty years to the point that it was the subject in 2019.
He’s always been a sack of festering horrors.
The corpse of that turtle is still going to vote for Trump.
The GOP internal polling must be showing disaster, if all the swamp monsters keep saying these things. Prove those polls correct, vote.
"The house I built out of shit smells like shit and it's disgusting what they did to me."
Fuck you, there's a straight fucking line from Reagan to Trump and you're in the middle of that path, pushing the fucking line forward
Oh look, the fucking devil has something to say. Tell us, Mitch, was this a realization that suddenly came upon you or was it absolutely crystal clear to you already when you were confirming his fucking nominees for the SC? When you refused to vote for his impeachment conviction, twice? I'd put you up on the wall right next to him.
If I were locked in a room with Trump, McConnell, and a gun with two bullets, I'd shoot Trump twice so that I could bludgeon McConnell to death slowly. Amazing that people are already forgetting how badly he fucked over America and the entire world as senate leader.
Just eat some lettuce in front of him and bad mouth his handlers while he starves. Moscow Mitch the turtle bitch would suffer so much just from that.
You can't control the face-eating tiger you helped create, you say? Oh look, it's the consequences of your own actions, you absolute doorknob. :/
Lol you thinks he gives a shit? He'll be dead and buried in ten years on a very comfortable mountain estate well insulated from the rest of the collapse.
you thinks he gives a shit?
I think he's absolutely thrilled.
McConnell might be a shadow of his former self, but his entire career his focus above all else was appointing young conservative judges.
He might detest trump, but he still got what he wanted from trump.
Imagine if Bernie got to name all the judges trump did
I'm guessing he's just trying to rehabilitate his legacy before he croaks. Democrats love trotting out Republicans that don't like Trump. Bush and Cheney are now more loved by the Democratic establishment than they are by Republicans, and nobody in the media mentions that they're war criminals.
idk turtles can become very old
Reagan was a bag of shit, no doubt, but Trump is several orders of magnitude worse.
Reagan sold America for parts and committed acts of mass murder (debatably genocide, but it’s a definition question) by inaction. Trump wants to round up the undesirables. One is very evil, but the other manages to be much worse
I dunno. At least Trump is too fuckin stupid to hide it.
Go fuck yourself, Mitch. He could have done more about this but he chose to actively make it worse.
You know… I’m rather proud to be in the only state that never voted for Reagan.
McConnell is full of shit.
.....as he votes for Trump. Virtue signaling don't mean shit, droopy.
Reagan? The D list actor who betrayed the country and the hostages in iran by making a deal with iran before his election? The jackass who cut taxes for his rich buddies under a ridiculous promise that the money would trickle down to us poors? Reagan and trump are the two worst presidents since I was born and I was alive when Nixon was president.
Reagan was a massive piece of shit. Maybe he wouldn't have liked Trump as a person, but he was as much a conservative as Trump.
The more I learn about Reagan the more he sounds like a smarter version of Trump.
The difference between the two is really their wives. Nancy was the real power behind the presidency.
I hope hell is real so McConnell can someday get what he deserves.
The Kentucky Republican, who has previously said he is most proud of his legacy in shaping the Supreme Court and leading the efforts to confirm three new conservative justices during Trump’s presidency, acknowledged that Justice Clarence Thomas “exercised pretty questionable judgment,” when he chose to accept trips from a major GOP donor. “But then again, I’m not sure what the rules are,” he added.
Sure thing, bub.
Na, Reagan would have loved Trump. I don't think people really grasp just how racist Ronny was.
Reagan would probably recognize a senile celebrity president whose wife gave out blow jobs like Halloween candy.
Rats leaving a sinking ship.
Why aren’t the book burners after this guy? JFC.
CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for CNN:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/23/politics/mcconnell-trump-gop-new-book/index.html
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
229 points (97.9% liked)
politics
19090 readers
4904 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS