450
submitted 9 hours ago by Kory@lemmy.ml to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Yes yes, I REALLY want to terminate that process and I am very sure about it too, ty.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dukatos@lemm.ee 3 points 58 minutes ago

Unless it is nfs unmount on down server. Or failed disk...

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Is there some Linux equivalent to "ctrl + alt + del?" I get that killing a process from the terminal is preferred, but one of the few things I like about windows is if the GUI freezes up, I can pretty much always kill the process by pressing ctrl+alt+del and finding it in task manager. Using Linux if I don't already have the terminal open there are plenty of times I'm just force restarting the computer because I don't know what else to do.

[-] phlegmy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 51 minutes ago

Ctrl+alt+F1/F2/F3 etc.
It lets you switch to another terminal session, where you can use something like top/htop for a commandline equivalent to task manager.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

most distros have something, yeah, generally called [something] monitor

[-] Seqularise@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Try ctrl+shift+ESC And remember, there are customizable hotkeys, just explore the settings

[-] fleabomber@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

I've heard those quick keys a thousand times but my brain has determined that it is not necessary information for me to retain.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 26 points 4 hours ago
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

“Userid 1000 will shut down in 2 minutes”

Or whatever it says

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

I haven't seen that in a while. When you see that it means either that the service didn't handle the terminate signal correctly or that is is busy doing something. (Sometimes both)

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

I was just using it as an example against the 2nd image

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 44 minutes ago

Wait until you find out about taskill /F /IM explore.exe

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 hours ago

you forgot that you have to spend about 2 minutes with windows "searching for a solution" (who knows what that does??) and then another minute reporting it to microsoft

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 120 points 8 hours ago

And as always with this meme: Both Windows and Linux can ask a process nicely to terminate or kill it outright. And the default for both is to ask nicely.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

on windows a process can get in a state so that it is impossible to make it go away, even with process explorer or process hacker. mostly this also involves the bugged software becoming unusable.

I encounter such a situation from time to time. one way it could happen is if the USB controller has got in an invalid state, which one of my pendrives can semi-reliably reproduce. when that happens, any process attempting to deal with that device or its FS, even the built-in program to remove the drive letter, will stop working and hang as an unkillable process.

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 hours ago

Linux has that issue too. A process in an uninterruptible blocking syscall stays until that syscall finishes, which can be never if something weird's going on.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

oh, that's good to know! iirc that's the same reason it happens on windows too

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

oh, that's good to know! iirc that's the same reason it happens on windows too

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I've seen that on Linux as well. Funnily enough also with faulty file systems. I think NFS with spotty wifi for one.

Oh, and once with a dying RAID controller. That was a pain in the ass. At that point I swore to only ever do RAID in software.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

oh yeah now that you say, SMB/CIFS mounted share if connection is no more. when I experienced this, it was temporary though, because there's a timeout which is half (or double?) of the configurable reconnection timeout. but now that I think of it, I'm not sure if it made it unkillable.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 39 points 7 hours ago

Next, you'll tell me I shouldn't get all my news from memes!

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 4 points 4 hours ago

Windows can kill a process outright.

Hmmmm...

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

Taskkill /f is reasonably close to sudo kill -9

Hitting the X in Windows and hitting the X in Linux both cause the application to start a save yourself routine. From the OS standpoint they're not far off.

The problem is we have a lot of confirmation bias in windows because every time we want to close an application that's not working, that save yourself call has to sit around for a hellaciously long time out followed by a telemetry call so that Microsoft can track that it happened.

It's pretty rare that Linux apps don't just close.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 20 points 7 hours ago

Well, with linux you get the option of sending mixed signals through the use of varying count of guns. I find 9 to be highly effective.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

It's awesome Linux can STOP and CONT processes ngl

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 33 points 6 hours ago

My problem with Windows is that when I want to eject a USB drive, Windows refuses to do so, refuses to tell me what program is apparently still using the drive, and certainly refuses to kill that program. I am removing the drive. I can't just not remove it!

[-] Laristal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 hours ago

I've found that in those cases its usually explorer that's the culprit. Just having the removable drive open in explorer is enough to keep windows from being able to unmount the drive.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby 2 points 2 hours ago

At that point, you need to live dangerously and just yank it.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

The worst part is that with Quick Removal it's pretty much always safe to just remove it

[-] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 7 hours ago

Typing “kill -9” into a terminal is the equivalent to breaking out the acetylene torch when a nut won’t budge

[-] lemming741@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Can't be tight if it's liquid

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 8 hours ago

Sigterm: "End this process or next time I bring my -9"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
450 points (95.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21114 readers
1222 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS