720

Nothing helps stop Trump bleeding support from the senior woman demographic quite like a young whippersnapper punching a 70-year-old woman to the ground for her support of Harris.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 281 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Big tough guy sucker punched an old lady. Trump would be proud if it were possible for him to give a shit about anyone but himself.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 326 points 2 weeks ago

Not only that:

According to witnesses, Bossio said, the 17-year-old was walking away from a separate altercation with a male Harris supporter when he struck Tomasko and knocked her to the ground.

He did it because he was pissed at a male supporter but was too big of a wuss to throw hands with someone who could plausibly fight back, so to solve that, he sucker-punched an old lady. They're not just abusive garbage, they're pathetic cowards.

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 61 points 2 weeks ago

Trump supporters are lower than snake shit.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Snakes at least keep rat populations under control

Trump enthusiasts generally are rats

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

I told my coworker today that there is no good trump supporter. They'll are either ignorant, selfish, or vile. The first group i dont blame because they're idiots, the other 2 groups can go fuck off to the void.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

The scared, stupid, and selfish model. You don't have to be all three, but any one of them and Trump will take advantage of it to bring you over.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I am all three but I am still not a vile enough piece of shit to choose Donald.

load more comments (12 replies)

About as courageous as his role model.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Now That's Republican Toughness! ^TM

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 150 points 2 weeks ago

The lil shit isn't even old enough to vote

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 106 points 2 weeks ago

He's certainly old enough to get real time if they try him as an adult for aggravated assault.

[-] Shirasho@lemmings.world 85 points 2 weeks ago

At this rate he will never be able to vote.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, I hope he gets to vote in the future. Everyone should serve their punishment and get the chance to learn from it.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Emotionally I dislike your reply. Logically it’s correct. What good is “paying your debt to society” but never being forgiven when you live a better life after punishment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 99 points 2 weeks ago

Little dummy must’ve been watching Andrew Tate.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 107 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, 100%, society is underestimating the terrible influence Tate, Peterson, and similar grifters are having on men (especially younger men).

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 weeks ago

Jordan Peterson is really bad because the carnivore diet he promotes would starve the chud’s brain of nutrients.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 64 points 2 weeks ago

Peterson is bad because he appeals to lonely blue collar millennial men who, if they had positive male role models or better friends, would have a real chance of being actual decent people.

Tate is bad because he appeals to young men and boys who lack the life experience to know the guy is a loser and a grifter.

My opinion anyway.

[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 weeks ago

The harm I notice Peterson doing is setting back men's mental health movements. A big barrier I run into working in mental health is not having enough male role models either locally in my area or public personalities online who are willing to discuss things like medication and therapy, but also to discuss the important lifestyle changes that have to be made, particularly in terms of healthy relationships. A big part of men's mental health needs to be men supporting men instead of competing for women to then use as their sole emotional support. In addition to placing an unfair burden on women, it's just frankly a burden that can't and ultimately won't be carried, leaving men with inadequate support when there's a better solution to be had. Instead you have peterson (and others, but Peterson has a fancy psych degree to hide his bullshit behind) perpetuating these antiquated ideas that men should be competing with each other. Men deserve better.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

I run into troubled young men a lot, unfortunately. I was raised female so I often lack the context to truly empathize with their life experiences, and I'm really hurting for coworkers to consult who can.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 95 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t need to keep being reminded that Trump supporters are the absolute worst pieces of shit on the planet.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 51 points 2 weeks ago

But, we can’t ever forget.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, I think we all deserve at least a little bit of forgetting every day. We’ve been enduring this bullshit for the better part of a decade. We don’t owe that asshole 100% of our attention all the time. Fuck him. And fuck everyone of his followers, too.

The Nerenberg trials got it right by executing the lot of them. We need more of that after this election cycle. There is no value in keeping them around. It’s not like any of them are launching rockets or anything.

Oh, fuck…

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I think we all deserve at least a little bit of forgetting every day.

come join me in a state with legal weed

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I kind of wouldn't mind seeing him get 100% of the attention for a little bit of time. I wouldn't mind hearing him whine as loudly as writtenhouse does about how his life is ruined.

[-] Baggins@feddit.uk 5 points 2 weeks ago

He's nowhere near as clever as von Braun.

[-] crunchyoutside@lemmy.world 95 points 2 weeks ago

Domestic terrorist. She was attacked by a domestic terrorist. This crime would seem to meet the DHS definition.

We need to start calling this crap what it is.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Damn right it does. This individual needs to be charged and prosecuted.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago

When I think of conservatives, I always think of youths sucker punching old Asian women in the back of the head because of Covid. This is typical.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 32 points 2 weeks ago

These damn DEMOCRATS need to Learn how to Tone Down their Rhetoric!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

Glad he is charged. What a jackass.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

A minor, get his shitty MAGAT parents in the courtroom too.

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

What an absolute weak turd holy hell.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

He's just doing what donnie told him to do.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

I'm going to stand in line to vote tomorrow...should I take my can of Fox 5.3?

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

just MAGAt shit.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

more of that to come if the angry orange gets installed

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Or if he doesn't.

There's going to be violence. More people will die because of him, and i can't do anything about it and I'm going insane.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Hopefully he will be in jail on Tuesday so he can't vote

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

He's 17, he can't vote regardless

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
720 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2948 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS