57
submitted 8 hours ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 59 points 8 hours ago

It would take some balls to convict and sentence a President-elect, and of course Trump would have major personal grievances against the Judge, but if justice is blind, he deserves the same punishment as any other New Yorker who would have committed such crimes 34 times.

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 24 points 7 hours ago

Also, it would've been a faster trial and sentencing.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 47 points 8 hours ago

he's not in office.

his interference in 2016 helped get him there the first time.

his current status is partly due to that as well.

he deserves a max sentence for the significance of the events occurring in-part as a result of the illegal election interference for which he was convicted.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 10 points 7 hours ago
[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 41 points 8 hours ago

Let's guess: guilty but no penalties

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 11 points 7 hours ago

Maybe they could fine him a couple thousand dollars and tell him not to do it again or else.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 hours ago

I doubt Trump would even pay a token fine. The consequences for not paying a fine is that the punishment could escalate, but the punishment can't escalate so why pay?

[-] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

If the justice system worked his conviction here would be cause enough to be ineligible for office (as well as each of his 34 felony convictions).

Since this happened prior to this term it also cannot be claimed an official act.

Theoretically something could be done about this before he’s sworn in, but I doubt it.

America, we’re really about to give a felon the keys to the kingdom even though the constitution forbids it because nobody in a position of power here cares to go through the trouble. Hope you’re happy.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago
  1. He is not a sitting president yet.

  2. He was not a sitting president when the offenses occurred in 2016, either, when he had yet to be elected. Even if the "presidential immunity" ruling could somehow be twisted to apply to this as if it were an official act, he was in no way shape or form president at that time.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago

I know it won't happen, but I would love to see him be dictator "on day one only" while in Riker's.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

What do you think won't happen? That he'll go to Rikers, or that he'll only be a dictator for one day?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

The former. Well both. I don't think it will just be one day.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Does it even matter at this point? Can't he just throw pardons everywhere as needed once he takes office?

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Convict him, lock him up, and tell Vance "If you leave him there you get to be the president."

[-] preludeofme@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah not much of a consolation prize there... 😐

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 7 hours ago

I can already tell ya he’s free to go.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Fuck is there somewhere online I can place a bet on this?

Might as well turn a profit off if this horrible fucking clown show.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 7 hours ago

Sad day for many of my hopes

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
57 points (95.2% liked)

News

23265 readers
3581 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS