171

Summary

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell asserts that he cannot be fired by President-elect Donald Trump, citing legal protections under the Federal Reserve Act.

Trump has previously expressed his desire to remove Powell, but legal experts argue that a policy disagreement would not constitute “for cause” removal.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 137 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They have the SCOTUS majority and Congress you fuck.

If you're really trying to be bold, do something worthwhile to stop him instead of posturing about your miniscule fucking job.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He is correct, though, that as the law currently stands, Trump can't just get rid of him on his own authority. And changing the law does take time, theres a process to go through. It's not like they can just pass a bill that says "Trump can do whatever he damn well pleases". It has to be worded properly to pass legal muster. There are specific committees that deal with that stuff, and the legislators in charge of that want to keep ownership of it. And he would need to get the entire Republican Caucus to agree, since it will get no Democratic support at all. A handful of Republicans might have their own reasons to not make the changes Trump demands.

Trump can try without going through all that trouble, but the Powell gets to tell him to go pound sand, and the courts got the final say. Even if the courts are in the tank for Trump, it will still take time to resolve

If Trump wants him gone, he could probably manage it eventually, with enough effort. But will the administration be disciplined enough to see it through? They might decide other things are more important, like putting brown people in camps.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago

Since when have laws stopped, or for that matter slowed the trump administration

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

"But it's against the law!" he exclaimed as the firing squad raised their rifles...

[-] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago

Law is a human construct, it is essentially a consensus structure. You can hold up a piece of paper that says "I can do what I want" and maybe it's even legitimate, but you still need to convince other people of that and our legal structure/precedent puts more emphasis on process than being efficient or fast.

In effect, the law has stopped trump from doing just about everything he wants to sans a few items. Every time he tries to do something he has to fight a bunch of people and that takes up some of his finite time and resources.

Just because he has friends in all the high places doesn't mean everyone else will just jump into line and do exactly what he wants, the more people obstruct the less damage he can do.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

The Supreme Court has actually set the precedent that the president is allowed to do whatever they want with complete immunity. From a legal standpoint, Trump can absolutely just get rid of him, one way or another, with no repercussions.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago

For what you suggest to happen they’d have to physically block him from the office and cancel his payroll. Otherwise he just keeps going.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 15 points 23 hours ago

Sounds to me like you are not very well read on 1930's German history.

I'm not saying he is factually fucking wrong. I'm saying his posturing is useless.

[-] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

I'd argue he is. Politics and law aren't deterministic, the rules are flexible and determined by how people interpret them. If it was actually a non issue he wouldn't bother saying anything. He's posturing and trying to make a case so that the admin is less likely to start that fight. Everyone has limited time and resources so making it seem like fucking with the Fed would take a lot of both lowers the odds they try.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

So you're saying this one guy is being useful for somehow saying his job is safe?

This is the worst take...

[-] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

I mean, he's done a good enough job and I'd take him over literally anyone trump wants to appoint.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago

For those who are saying "Trump can't do this or can't do that...."

Yes. Yes he fucking can.

The American people just voted, in a landslide, in favor of Trump's agenda. And they voted to send more MAGA people to Congress to help him. They have full control of all 3 branches of government now, with comfortable majorities.

The Supreme Court just said Trump is immune from prosecution for official acts, which they define as "whatever Trump says they are, unless we say otherwise."

There are no more "moderate" Republicans. Anyone who is not fully on board the Trump train has been weeded out. They are there to rubber stamp Project 2025. And there's not a single one left who would dare to speak, let alone vote, against him.

This is a "Do what I want and get away with it" administration. Trump will do what he wants. And if it's not legal, Congress is there to make it legal. And if it's unconstitutional, the Supreme Court is there to make it Constitutional.

Understand this. There are no guardrails any more. They've all been removed. And rather than defend Democracy, the American people just handed them the tools to do it. Trump can do what he wants, will do what he wants, and he'll do it to the thunderous applause of the American public.

Authoritarianism is here. It's covered in spray-tan. And it's going to be sworn in in January.

Remember, Arab-Americans. You refused to vote for Harris because of Gaza. When Israel ratchets up the genocide with Trump's blessing, remember that you voted for this.

Remember, Latino men who wouldn't vote for Harris because she's a woman. When you get caught up in the mass deportations or half of your friends get sent back to their home countries, remember that you voted for this.

Same with the white guys. When you lose that cushy federal job because your answers on a random questionnaire weren't MAGA enough, remember that you voted for this.

When it's your daughters bleeding out in a parking lot because of a national abortion ban, remember that you voted for this.

You think you're strapped for cash now? Trump's new tariffs are going to cost you on average about $400 a month. You won't get anything out of it. You'll just be spending $400 a month on literally nothing because the guy you voted for doesn't understand how tariffs work. And that doesn't even count price hikes from the ripple effects of the tariffs and what it will do to the entire supply chain. Hope you've got a plan, because again.......you fucking voted for this.

And this doesn't even take into account the fact that Republicans just got finished admitting that they were lying about Project 2025 all along. They know how unpopular it is. They know people see it as a power grab. THEY OPENLY ADMITTED FUCKING LYING TO YOU TO GET THEIR AGENDA PASSED. JD VANCE OPENLY ADMITTED LYING TO VOTERS IN ORDER TO SHAPE THE NARRATIVE. AND YOU STILL VOTED FOR THEM. And they couldn't even wait 24 hours before taking the masks off and laughing directly in your face. Project 2025 is what we do know about. I'm fearful of what else they've been withholding that they plan on doing.

Y'all are about to find out that the most expensive trip in your lives is going to prove to be the trip to the voting booth that you didn't take. We'll all be paying for that for decades to come.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

I'll be ready to remind the dumbfucks in my life that I know voted for their diaper daddy. Believe that.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago

“Legal protections” lmao

These fucking idiots. He doesn’t care. He never has. He never will. And this round, he’s got shitloads of people waiting in the wings to kneecap and bleed out the bureaucracy that’s designed to protect normal people and important positions that need to be isolated from politics by their very nature. This time he’s gotten people to look up the blueprints and they’re going for the weak points. And there’s going to be paramilitary.

“Price is right” rules: call how long it takes Powell to become a political prisoner, at best. I’m gonna say 17 months.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago

citing legal protections

...yeah bro, those are just as fucked as the rest of the US.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Unless you're also the President of the US "legal protections" mean jack shit. You will do the Kings bidding or you suffer his wraith.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago

“Legal protections”, fkn lol!

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Trump used defenestration; it was super effective!

[-] BoobaAwooga@lemmynsfw.com 30 points 1 day ago

All these idiots that think they’re untouchable. Repubs have total control, it’s only a matter of time before they come for you.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I'm gussing it'll play out like:

  Official act #4:  Secret Service, bring him to me, but take a long time. 
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Trump doesn't even have to get his hands dirty on this. He'll drop a few tweets about his "Marxist monetary policies" putting the economy at risk and Trumps supporters will harass and threaten him into resigning.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Wonder if they'll respin Gitmo and fill it with his opponents. Cuba could use some cash.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

He’s a Republican even though it’s not a partisan office. Trump put him there.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

ok Jerry. but... what if he kills you? I bet he can do that with those neato new powers SCOTUS gave him.

[-] Backlog3231@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

So all he has to do is get his faithful blackshirts to murder him and then everyone else will get the message.

Or maybe he accidentally falls off a high building.

[-] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

The first members of the administration, Congress, or the SC who aren’t faithful enough will be the ones who ‘commit suicide by throwing themselves out their hotel windows’, the rest will rubber stamp any and every maga law, to include anything that would prevent him from being president for life, like his buddy Putin.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago

They don't even have to do anything beyond publishing the guys home address.

This has been in the works for a long time now.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I'm willing to bet that the Justice department and SC under Trump will make it happen.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago
[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Does it matter? Powell’s term ends in a year and a half, and then Trump gets to pick a train wreck chair that we would be stuck with for 4 years.

Also, he claims he doesn’t want to give Powell a 3rd term.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I wonder if he realizes…

He just got the fed reserve act nuked?

Great Job!

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Thing is, it only takes a minute to be open windowed.

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The Supreme Court said Trump can.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

He was moving a bath tub on the roof and he 'slipped' and fell.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

It's basically unheard of to order a Fed Chair to resign. Trump might as well ask all the Democratic appointees on SCOTUS to resign. Difference is, Powell is due to leave in May 2026, and Trump would be really stupid to try and force an early departure. Just end up with egg on his face. It will be Trump’s to loot in 2026 in any case,

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
171 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4090 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS