Minor notes after researching the tools some more:

• Neither tool is free as in freedom. They're proprietary and the limited source code they released is different from the binaries they provide.
• They have not released a Linux version and any port is impossible due to the proprietary nature.
• They only support Nvidia GPUs.
• The WebGlaze tool is invitation only. This isn't in and itself a bad thing, except you can only request an invitation via Instagram or Twitter.
• One or both of the projects have violated the GPL at one point early on.

I'm not an artist but nearly all of the aforementioned points lead me to have a resoundingly negative view of the project. Maybe I'm cynical but it seems they intend to make the tool subscription-based in the future after gaining enough market share.

The problem with this tools is they don't protect human art, they protect human art into a capital liberal economic framework.

Artists prefers to show lesser quality of their work to the audience, because with glaze the change is noticeable as artefacts, rather than changing the way they diffuse their art.

You want justice ? Start acknowledging the fact that internet isn't anything alike physical space therefore art can and should be shared and used wieldy. Second fact is the way artists are making money is still based on art rarity, which online is just inapplicable bullshit and it's actually a form of cultural domination. It's a model made for physical works, not online ones.