316
submitted 1 month ago by credo@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 71 points 1 month ago

wow. kudos for being the "now that it's too late to have an impact, i'm going to do the thing i should have done many months ago" president

[-] Arbiter@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

Long range missiles can have a lot of impact in a short time.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago

all the more reason this (among other things) should have happened many months ago

[-] Arbiter@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

Yeah, but now is better than never.

God knows Trump wouldn’t authorize it.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

you're right. i'm just salty because we live in a fascist dictatorship now

we're basically russia. could biden have even done anything? i don't even know

[-] Arbiter@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

As long as we draw breath it ain’t over.

Get out there and organize.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

how do you organize with people who refuse to consider anything other than "maybe it won't be that bad" or worse?

if you have a network of people who you trust and are actually willing to take some kind of action beyond "oh well i guess this is life now," then i'm officially jealous

[-] Arbiter@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Well, a network of likeminded people won’t just find you. It’s something you’ve gotta seek out.

Look for local non-profits and political groups that advocate for the positions you care about and get involved.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not exactly russia.

I know 2nd trump term is terrifying, I'm not denying that this will be worse than his first term, but the difference is that the US has the separation of powers between the states and the federal government. The check and balance within the federal government is gone, but we still have this final line of defence, that is federalism. States can resist tyranny of the federal government, if they have the willingness to do so. Remember, that states run elections, swing states do not all have a republican trifecta. And even in republican trifecta states, there is still the state judiciary, and we might still have some of those non-magas republicans like Raffensperger.

The election in 2026 will likely be less free and fair than 2024, but with a large enough democratic margin of victory, democrats can still take back the house, maybe senate.

Maybe I'm in denial, but I consider this view to be optimism. I thought people like Raffensperger would just cave in and do whatever trump wanted but they didn't.

Don't give up hope. We'll soon see if federalism really works, if states would find the will to resist a tyrannical federal government.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Oh no, one missile went astray and hit Mar-a-Lago. OH NO WE"RE SO SORRY

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

At the start of the invasion Russia was claiming they finally had hypersonic nuclear missles. Meaning they could get nukes past defense systems. That is the reason the US was hesitant to let things escalate.

Since then we’ve found out that Russias hypersonic missles had some misfires and still didn’t have the ability to steer at hypersonic speeds if I remember right.

That plus the fact that Trump is months away from helping Russia changes the strategy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now give them a thousand tomahawks and the location of every single Putin palace.

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, only allowed in Kursk

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] credo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

I believe NYT makes you login, even on a gift link. Here is a TLDR:

President Biden has authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike Russian and North Korean forces in Russia, a significant shift in U.S. policy. This decision comes in response to Russia’s introduction of North Korean troops into the conflict and their anticipated assault on Ukrainian forces in the Kursk region.

The move reflects growing concerns over Ukraine’s ability to withstand simultaneous assaults while defending territory. The authorization aims to bolster Ukraine’s defense, target high-value military assets, and deter North Korean involvement. However, it has sparked debate among U.S. officials over escalation risks, as Russia might retaliate against the U.S. or its allies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to reduce U.S. support for Ukraine, is set to take office in two months, adding urgency to the decision. The Ukrainian strategy may include using captured Russian territory in Kursk as leverage in potential future negotiations. Meanwhile, the risk of Russian countermeasures remains a central concern for Biden’s administration and its allies.

My take: I’ve been waiting on this since the US election. It’s sound strategy of we believe Putin won’t want to escalate with NATO before Trump takes office.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

The other side of this is that once it's allowed, Trump would have to take it away.

[-] credo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I think Trump will simply stop sending any new munitions.

[-] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Possible, but other countries that have such weapons are sure to follow and allow the use now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago
[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Too little, too late. Just allowing it in kursk.

At least uk and france gave ukraine the green for using their weaponry in russia.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Yes, there should have never been these ridiculous restrictions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

While they won't be able to reach Moscow with these, even from within Kursk, I am willing to bet the authorization was withheld on intelligence grounds. A lot of things in the war make sense if you look at it from the perspective that arms support can't be guaranteed.

Instead of letting Ukraine just burn through weapons, the US and allies have waited until they have the full operational capability to deploy the weapons with extreme effectiveness. They've had ATACMS for a while, so I suspect they held off deep strikes until the most effective targets had been identified and the likelihood of effective strike was near certain.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

That's giving everyone involved a lot of credit. To be honest, I sort of doubt these decisions were quite that rational.

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Blindly stumbling along then trying to pretend it was 4D chess all along sounds much more like us

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Too late.

Americans chose to abandon Ukraine when they elected Donald Trump and his Republican enablers.

Russia will win, there will be one less democratic nation on the planet, Russia will expand their borders, and Europe/NATO will be threatened.

Thanks conservatives, 3rd party voters, single issue voters, and non-voters. You really thought this one through.

[-] phx@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

They failed long before the Trumpanzee was voted in. This is just last moment desperation after they not only failed to support Ukraine, but failed to stop the Russian propaganda and bribery machine in the US.

But, Americans aren't wrong that they also failed long before this. They failed to support the people in favor of corporate interests. They failed to deal stop the Republicans from stacking the courts.

They failed because time and time again, they would rather try to appeal to Republican voters who will NEVER switch sides or change that minds in any significant number, while ignoring the issues that have decimated support with their own base and claiming to have the moral high ground.

Thks isn't just on the people that didn't show up to vote, but also the people in government that let it get to this point by continually failing to act.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Better late than never, I guess.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

I’m seeing a lot of comments taking this literally or saying why didn’t he do this before –

You all realise this is a very powerful symbolic gesture, right? This is a diplomatic move, not a literal one. The president of the US would never strike at this time in this kind of proxy war, and this is the closest ‘fuck you’ he can issue at Russia (which, again, would not be said aloud).

There’s nothing the US president could do to poke the Russian bear –other than escalate it to a hot war – other than this. This is an outgoing diplomatic move, and that is all.

[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Kremlin. Go for Kremlin.

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

They only have 300 km range. They are very nice but still. Pretty sure Ukraine has struck further inland with drones.

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Ah. Some fireworks before the show is over.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
316 points (98.2% liked)

News

23634 readers
1939 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS