466
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago

Thats one of the reasons i'm not having kids. I have a decent life by any metric but I had to work my ass off and face a tonne of resistance in my career. It always feels like I'm playing catch up with the cost of everything going up and up to the point where I'm just exhausted and depressed. Like, what is the point of living?! it honestly feels like theres just nothing left to enjoy anymore, everything has been monetized to hell and back. They told us as kids that you can be anything you want when you grow up, the future is bright and if you work hard you will be rewarded and its just not true. I can't do that to another person, these problems are only getting worse with no end in sight.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

That's the point? The left get demoralized and the right can't be because they have no morals. Its part of the reason right wingers tend to have a dozen children, it's quite literally biblical drown them in numbers bullshit.

[-] kozy138@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago

Idiocracy is a documentary

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

It absolutely isnt

President Comacho has a problem, finds the most qualified person to fix it, does so (reluctantly) and then dosen't take credit. This so divorced from reality that it should be concidred high fantasy.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, Idiocracy has this basic assumption that people are generally acting in good faith, even the ones with more selfish tendencies. It's been a while since I've seen it, but didn't someone else get frozen along with the MC and started out with a "fuck you, I'll take care of myself however I need to" before later pivoting to a "we need to work together to save the world!"

Just like that Batman scene where the boat full of civilians and the boat full of criminals have the trigger for each others' bombs. In the real world, I'd bet the guard that was handed the trigger on the prisoner boat would have pressed it almost immediately. And if he didn't, there would have been a riot on the civilian boat to push it rather than a calm vote that decides against it, followed closely by the same thing on the prisoner boat. And many from both boats would have just bailed into the water rather than trust the other boat to not kill them. Joker would have been completely right in his prediction of how things would go. Especially in a city like Gotham. The catch should have been that the boats had their own trigger instead of each others'.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] vaper@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

The catch-22 is that if the people with environmental values don't have kids, those values aren't passed on to the next generation (unless they become teachers or media personalities).

[-] Slotos@feddit.nl 42 points 5 months ago

You don’t need to have kids to pass on values. The basic premise of your statement doesn’t hold up.

[-] vaper@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Well, like I mentioned you still need some sort of interaction with kids. Or maybe influence their parents enough to have them indirectly pass on those values you imparted on them. But I still think that if the smartest, kindest, most compassionate people among us stop having kids... well then that's not great for that next generation. I've just always felt that giving up one of the primary factors of life, reproduction, seems very defeatist. But on the other hand, if someone genuinely doesn't want children then by all means don't.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago

I know at least one friend that wants to adopt/foster once they're ready, instead of having biological children.

The justification was similar to what you said, where they want to pass on their values / legacy, but don't care about the genetic side

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is the answer. The problem is the huge expense to adopt at least in the US. Money that could make a better life for the child being adopted is taken by the state.

We need to streamline adoption while still vetting the potential parents as unlikely to be abusive.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Any society that doesn't impart those values across the board to its citizens will devolve into shit regardless.

It's basically just math.

People with zero values are going to fuck like rabbits and people with values aren't.

If trash family has 5 kids they can't take care of and a dad that leaves, that's at least 4 really mad poor kids that are going to blame a lot on somesuch minority for their problems in 18 years.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Squorlple@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What is the acceptable level of tragedy to impart upon a non-consenting progeny? I vote for zero

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You'd have to be immortal, first. Most kids are gonna live to see their own parents pass.

Tragedy is a part of life.

It's easily avoidable tragedy, unaddressed by those who could do something about it, that's the problem.

Even worse, there's potentially extinction level tragedy happening right now, going unaddressed by those who can do something about it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

garbage health care

mass shootings

violent racism

[-] mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 5 months ago

RIP Alaska, Hawaii, and Michigan's Upper Peninsula

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I mean, the UK has 2 out of 3 of those. And most countries have the violent racism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Look at this guy who thinks the USA invented racism and holds a monopoly on it.

[-] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

In Europe it's just sparkling "let them down in the Mediterranean and/or make sure they stay in their own neighborhoods."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

When we go down we are taking all of you with us.

[-] Fergie434@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Don’t worry we know

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stinky@redlemmy.com 27 points 5 months ago

DO NOT HAVE CHILDREN REPEAT DO NOT HAVE CHILDREN

THIS MESSAGE IS FOR ALL RESIDENTS OF PLANET EARTH

NO ONE NEEDS YOU TO BIRTH THEM

ABORT. ABORT. ABORT.

WE HAVE ENOUGH PEOPLE, THE PLANET IS BURNING, THEY WILL NOT LEAD GOOD LIVES. IT'S NOT WORTH IT. PULL OUT BEFORE YOU NUT HOLY CHRIST PLEASE DO NOT HAVE KIDS

[-] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is mostly copied over from my recent comments elsewhere, but it is very relevant here too.

By 2030 we are going to be 40% over capacity on fresh water resources globally. and 40% of arable land has already been depleted, and 95% will be by 2050.

And that's just water and food.

Once arctic ice sheet coverage gets below 1,000,000 square kilometres, the planet will be absorbing more heat than it reflects and this is called a Blue Ocean Event.

The BOE will trigger the Clathrate Gun which will cause seabeds to rapidly realease fuck tons of methane, cooking the earth in it's own atmosphere.

2024 Arctic sea ice likely reached its annual minimum extent of 4.28 million square kilometers.

Greenhouse gas emissions are still increasing and fuelled by climate change, the world's oceans have broken temperature records every single day over the past year.

So it's basically a race between whether the drought and famine kill us all first, or the BOE setting off the Clathrate Gun will.

Either way, it is unlikely the human race survives the century. Creating more people to suffer in this dying world, is stupid and cruel and is only going to speed up our demise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Please consider adoption as an alternative if you are in a stable situation and want children.

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago

My SO and I have both decided that we definitely don't want kids but would discuss the subject if any one of us seriously considered it for one reason or another. What we agreed on, though, is to look for adoption rather than biological children. We both have stuff we'd rather not pass along, firstly, and secondly, there's so many children that don't have any family. It's sorta like "adopt don't shop", if you will.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] EisFrei@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

When in human history was ever a good time to have children?

Is there an objective "this was the best year/decade/century"?

[-] darthelmet@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

That’s the neat part, there isn’t!

But being more serious: I think I can express the feeling of things being particularly worse now in a way that isn’t just recency bias.

Sure, over time technology has improved and that’s generally speaking allowed for better standards of living, at least for the people at the right end of that technology. (Not so great if you’re being conquered because someone shows up with guns for example.) So you could look at the past and say it was worse because materially things like food availability and medicine have become better over time.

But key to this was that all of this was a struggle of humans over nature. To the extent things were bad, there were tangible things we could do to improve.

These days, so many of our problems are self-inflicted and technology and economic development mostly makes them worse. Climate change is the obvious big one, but then there’s stuff like:

  • Weapons have become increasingly destructive and centrally usable. A small number of people can cause a lot more damage than they ever could in the past.

  • Surveillance technology invades our privacy in a way that’s unprecedented in human history.

  • Automation, communications, and transportation technology have made workers less and less powerful and therefore more subject to abuse and artificial poverty. This is one of the more messed up things about capitalism. Technology gets better and rather than getting the benefits of that progress, it actually hurts a lot of people.

  • Advances in science and technology, particularly data science, allow the powerful to hyper-optimize the bad things they were always doing or enables them to do things they’ve wanted to do.

  • A financialized economy creates economic catastrophes where people go homeless or starve without any actual changes to material conditions. The numbers got screwed up or the investors panicked and now everything sucks for no reason?

  • More generally, we can produce enough of the necessities of life for everyone, but capitalism ensures that those necessities won’t make it to people. Capitalism depends on scarcity. If you had a house you wouldn’t need to pay a landlord. If you had food you wouldn’t need to pay food companies. If you had both you wouldn’t need to go work and put up with awful conditions. We’ve solved our most fundamental problems and yet because of the interests of the system and those in power, that progress gets held back.

In the past, even if things were rough now, you could maybe look forward to them improving. Now it feels like the walls are closing in. Unless we actively do something about it, things are going to get worse for most people as more and more wealth accumulates in private hands, as we become subject to increasingly powerful forms of control, and as the powerful destroy the environment we need to live.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Draghetta@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Always whatever year you never lived

[-] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Ten years BEFORE you lived. Being a white male adult through the 80s must be peak?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Why do you think the politicians that are accelerating inequality are the same politicians that are trying to outlaw abortion?

They want babies because they need more workers to distribute inequality and produce more wealth for the shareholders. Foster kids are less likely to go to college, so they’re perfect fuel for the machine.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Don't forget soldiers. As George Carlin said, "Live babies make dead soldiers."

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

No, noone is under any obligation to do so.

Remember what they say on airplanes. Secure your own mask before helping others.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm Gen X, but cusp with Millennial. I said at 15 or 16 I'd never have kids & stuck with it. I'm more resolute than ever & feel like I would have massive guilt if I had caved. I felt the world was too fucked up back in the 90s. I wonder how my younger self would deal with the world today.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Give me a break. How about the people having kids in:

  • -900,000: Whatever happened to kill off almost all humans
  • -1177: Bronze Age collapse
  • 535: Volcanic winter of 536
  • 1347-1351: Black Death
  • 1914-1918: WWI and Spanish Flu
  • 1929-1939: Great Depression and Dust Bowl
  • 1962: Great Leap Forward
  • 1943-1945: Worst killings and bombings of WWII
  • 2020: For our lifetimes. COVID and 100 other disasters. So bad most have forgotten it started with Australia burning to the ground, 1 billion animals killed.

As to racism, we watched Mississippi Burning last night. My wife isn't from America and was horrified. "Honey, that was happening when our parents were kids."

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

2024+: Climate change, water wars, resultant mass migration, worldwide rise of fascism.

[-] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You're right we should have stopped having children millennia ago. I wish my parents never met.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 5 months ago

I don't think you understand why people stop having kids, do you? video

[-] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
466 points (96.2% liked)

Comic Strips

16038 readers
869 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS