101
submitted 5 days ago by N00b22@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@beehaw.org
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 65 points 5 days ago

Good, Ubisoft, please continue giving me reasons not to buy any of your games again. It's been like 10 years now.

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 15 points 5 days ago

Black Flag came out in 2013, so this tracks.

Although, having said that, they have released at least a few interesting things since then, good games and ideas that somehow made it through their corporate nonsense (which developers have made fun of themselves, like in the present day sequences in Black Flag) and might motivate someone to hold their nose and play them regardless, like for example their charming "Indie-like" games made by small teams within their oversized studios (Rayman Legends/Origins, Grow Home/Up, Valiant Hearts, various 2D Prince of Persias, etc.), neat VR experiments (e.g. Star Trek Bridge Crew), educational modes/spin-offs based on the Assassin's Creed games that cut out all of the slop and allow users to explore these game worlds freely - and Ghost Recon Wildlands, which on one hand is a hugely expensive AAA game with all of the typical trappings, from massive production values to godawful writing, but it also has a charming amount of jank and somehow really fun power fantasy squad command gameplay - but only after removing the awful launcher and DRM that makes you feel like the company hates you for buying their games.

[-] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 55 points 5 days ago

Why the fuck is there an anti-cheat in a single-player game? It's baffling.

[-] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 41 points 5 days ago

So they can turn around and sell you the cheats through an online store.

Don't want to just giving yourself everything, gotta fork over even more if you want that pretty sword, or a collectibles map.

[-] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 13 points 5 days ago

That makes sense now, and I'm slightly less perturbed; thank you. It's just grifters grifting, as they do.

[-] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 12 points 5 days ago

They've been at it with this for a minute. I think Assassin's Creed: Syndicate was the first one I really noticed it in when it was pushing a map that showed you all the locations for one collectible.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 days ago

So that they can withhold features

[-] jlow@beehaw.org 31 points 4 days ago

Not with the Fitgirl-Repack-version 👌

[-] Rogers@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 days ago

Doubt it's even worth pirating. Ubisoft gets consistently worse year after year.

[-] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 30 points 5 days ago

That certainly doesn't make the game more appealing.

[-] N00b22@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 days ago

Assassin's Creed Shadows Will Feature Denuvo & Account Linking + EULA also requires you to allow Ubisoft to "monitor" your RAM

The game's EULA also requires you to allow Ubisoft to "monitor" your RAM.

As Ubisoft prepares for the 2025 launch of Assassin's Creed Shadows – a game some view as the developer's last chance to break free from a year marked by financial setbacks and controversies – the game's Steam page has finally gone live, revealing two major caveats about the Steam version of AC Shadows that will, unfortunately for Ubisoft, likely drive away some gamers.

If you're in any way familiar with the PC gaming industry (or have read the title of this article), then you've most likely already guessed one of the caveats, and yes, the PC version of Assassin's Creed Shadows will feature Denuvo, a controversial DRM software detested by the community for negatively affecting loading times and framerate in games, something Denuvo's creator Irdeto categorically denies, blaming its low reputation on pirates and gamers.

While Denuvo's presence in Shadows isn't much of a surprise – considering it's been used in Ubisoft's previous games like Assassin's Creed Mirage, Star Wars Outlaws, the Far Cry series, and others – the decision to keep the DRM could be seen as questionable given the growing trend of developers ditching Denuvo or choosing not to include it in the first place, as well as Ubisoft's apparent need to steer clear of further controversies and reputational damage.

The second caveat relates to another requirement the community generally dislikes: the mandatory account linking to the studio's Ubisoft Connect platform when buying Assassin's Creed Shadows on Steam. Even though, much like Denuvo, this isn't anything new for Ubisoft fans, it could still negatively impact the game financially and reputationally considering what happened with Helldivers 2 earlier this year when Sony's now-retracted mandate to link Steam accounts to PSN caused an uproar, buried the game in negative reviews, and, as some believe, tanked the game's player numbers, with many blaming this backlash as the sole reason we've heard so little about Helldivers 2 in the second half of 2024, despite it being universally acclaimed and considered a strong contender for Game of the Year when it first launched.

To top it all off, Shadows' EULA also includes a provision that allows the game to monitor your PC's RAM to ensure you're not running any unauthorized programs like macros, cheats, or hacks, a well-intentioned clause that nonetheless feels a touch out of place in a single-player game and could potentially scare off some of the more suspicious players who aren't comfortable with their hardware being monitored.

And what's your take on those requirements? Would it be beneficial for Ubisoft to get rid of Denuvo and account linking while there's still time?

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 5 days ago

Geez Ubisoft... There's no need to be that invasive. I didn't plan too buy any of your games ever again, there's no need to convince me any further.

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

Oh fuck that. I'm not paying someone money for the privilege of being spied on when playing singleplayer.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 15 points 4 days ago

Fitting.... "Too many requests."

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 10 points 4 days ago

The worthwhile Assassin’s Creed games can be bought for a few bucks for the PS3/Xbox 360. Everything after Ezio is just an inessential sequel.

[-] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 4 points 4 days ago

Although Black Flag was pretty fun, the sailing mechanic was my favorite. Other then including that, I agree with you.

[-] hermano@feddit.org 9 points 5 days ago

Hahaha. No.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Why don’t people just play the original AC2 if the reskins have all this useless crap?

[-] the_white_wolf@social.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

@N00b22

On gaming i'm making compromises.
If the game turns out to be good, i will buy it at release day in Ubisoft Store.

[-] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

So you're gonna go of the word of IGN, Pcgamer and the like?

Because I'm pretty sure they are gonna praise it to high heaven even if it sucks.

[-] the_white_wolf@social.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago

@Faydaikin

Yes. They are more reputable for me than the loud gamer community at YT, reddit and other big social media which find reasons to complain about every game always.
For example many gamers hated Star Wars Outlaws.
I ignored all the Haters and purchased Star Wars Outlaws at Day One. It was a great decision; i had a great time with Star Wars Outlaws🙂

[-] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 3 points 4 days ago

Well, your taste is your own.

I've been burned by the bigger media companies before. But I seldomly buy anything at launch, anyway.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
101 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30581 readers
175 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS