104
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by PaX@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

On this day in 1983, a patent was granted to MIT for a new cryptographic algorithm: RSA. "RSA" stands for the names of its creators Rivest, Shamir, and Adlemen. RSA is a "public-key" cryptosystem. Prior to the creation of RSA, public-key cryptography was not in wide use.

Public-key cryptography

Cryptography is the study and practice of secure communication. Throughout most of its historical use, cryptographic techniques were entirely dependent on the involved parties already sharing a secret that could be used to reverse an encryption process. In early cryptography, the secret was itself the encryption process (for example, a Caesar cipher that substitutes letters in a secret message with letters a fixed number of steps down the alphabet). As cryptography became more systematic and widespread in use, it became necessary to separate cryptographic secrets from the cryptographic techniques themselves because the techniques could become known by the enemy (as well as static cryptographic schemes being more vulnerable to cryptanalysis). Regardless, there is still the issue of needing to share secrets between the communicating parties securely. This has taken many forms over the years, from word of mouth to systems of secure distribution of codebooks. But this kind of cryptography always requires an initial secure channel of communication to exchange secrets before an insecure channel can be made secure by the use of cryptography. And there is the risk of an enemy capturing keys and making the entire system worthless.

Only relatively recently has this fundamental problem been addressed in the form of public-key cryptography. In the late 20th century, it was proposed that a form of cryptography could exist where the 2 parties, seeking to communicate securely, could exchange some non-secret information (a "public" key) derived from privately held secret information (a "private" key), and use a mathematical function (a "trap-door" function) that is easy to compute in one direction (encryption) but hard to reverse without special information (decryption) to encipher messages to each other, using each other's respective public keys, that can't be easily decrypted without the corresponding private key. In other words, it should be easy to encipher messages to each other using a public key but hard to decrypt messages without the related private key. At the time this idea was proposed there was no known computationally-hard trap-door function that could make this possible in practice. Shortly after, several candidates and cryptosystems based upon them were described publicly πŸ‘, including one that is still with us today...

RSA

Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Leonard Adleman at MIT had made many attempts to find a suitably secure trap-door function for creating a public-key cryptosystem over a year leading up to the publication of their famous paper in 1978. Rivest and Shamir, the computer scientists of the group, would create a candidate trap-door function while Adleman, the mathematician, would try to find a way to easily reverse the function without any other information (like a public key). Supposedly, it took them 42 attempts before they created a promising new trap-door function.

As described in their 1978 paper "A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems", RSA is based upon the principle that factoring very large numbers is computationally difficult (for now!). The paper is a great read, if you're interested in these topics. The impact of RSA can't be overstated. The security of communications on the internet have been dependent on RSA and other public-key cryptosystems since the very beginning. If you check your browser's connection info right now, you'll see that the cryptographic signature attached to Hexbear's certificate is based on RSA! In the past, even the exchange of symmetric cipher keys between your web browser and the web server would have been conducted with RSA but there has been a move away from that to ensure the compromise of either side's RSA private keys would not compromise all communications that ever happened.

The future of RSA?

In 1994, a mathematician named Peter Shor, developed an algorithm for quantum computers that would be capable of factoring the large integers used in the RSA scheme. In spite of this, RSA has seen widespead and increasing use in securing communications on the internet. Until recently, the creation of a large enough quantum computer to run Shor's algorithm at sufficient scale was seen as very far off. With advances in practical quantum computers though, RSA is on its way out. Although current quantum computers are still a very long way off from being able to break RSA, it's looking more and more plausable that someone could eventually build one that is capable of cracking RSA. A competition being held by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, similar to the one that selected the Advanced Encryption Algorithm, is already underway to select standard cryptographic algorithms that can survive attacks from quantum computers.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • πŸ’š You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • πŸ’™ Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • πŸ’œ Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐢 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cigarette_comedian@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Heh, this apple I bought looks like it has a :butt:

:is-this: Is this "eating ass"?

[-] Grownbravy@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

It would be so funny if we crashed the economy for once.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] President_Obama@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Introducing jjeans β€” jizz jeans, jeans a guy's jizzed in

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Huldra@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Underrated movie gag is to do a freeze frame by literally just having the actors stay as still as possible, particularly if the freeze frame is on an extreme expression that takes effort to hold.

I know this is like a police squad thing but my fav example of it is from God of Cookery.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9JqT-O5eqY <- This is basically the climax of the film though in case you're wary of spoilers, I think the whole film is on youtube and its well worth a watch, same director/comedian as Kung Fu Hustle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

So now on reddit we have a pipeline from [Original meme] to {dunking subreddit posting bad meme] and now [https://old.reddit.com/r/memesopdidnotlike/] to dunk on the people who didn't like the meme, and finally [https://old.reddit.com/r/NahOPwasrightfuckthis/] for dunking on the dunkers of the original dunkers.

reddit-logo stalin-gun-1stalin-gun-2

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Are all British people like that or is it just Geordie Greep?

[-] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

I've played 30+ hours of Cyberpunk now and while it's definitely very good, I kinda feel like it's too big for it's own good. There's a number of features and quests that I think are cool, but the game would've been fine and more cohesive without them. It makes it feel like it's less than the sum of its parts.

I hesitate to call the game "bloated" because I don't think that's the right thing to call it. "Excessive" feels more appropriate. It's not like these quests are cheap filler to pad the runtime or boring fetch quests, they're well made and creative, but that alone doesn't justify them being in this game. They are fat that could've been trimmed, and I think the game would've been better for it. The Ozob quest with the grenade clown is a good example of this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CDommunist@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Back to work

[-] Melina@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grownbravy@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Today might actually be cool

[-] milistanaccount09@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

me baiting the little nafoists in my phone (I'm bored on the bus and have nothing better to do with my time)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

China is going to collapse in exactly 8 hours 32 minutes from RIGHT NOW here-it-comes

[-] SoylentSnake@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

cockroaches are truly gods most loathsome creatures

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago
[-] SoylentSnake@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

yeah plus wasps, bed bugs, surely some others I'm forgetting. I was def exaggerating but still I hate these little fux

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VHS@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

just realized in the "Blocks" screen you can search for comms to block without having to see their content. no hentai or AI-generated images shall encroach on my feed

[-] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Me yesterday reading Chainsawman in the morning sicko-power

Me yesterday reading Jujutsu kaisen leaks before going to sleep oooaaaaaaauhhh

[-] buh@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Just overheard someone say birds are a type of insect, is this true?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
104 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23273 readers
25 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS