5

This is a genuine question.

I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.

P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let's be civil.

And if you're a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

This is a good question from the wrong angle. This event is cathartic for many people because the ultra rich who ruin countless lives never get punished. When they see “consequences” it’s a golden parachute. This event is frustrating because the media, legal, and security apparatuses expect us to treat this assassination as a grave act, but actively normalize the acts of harm Thompson and other leaders like him commit every day.

This event is revealing in stark terms the divide between the elite and the average person. Should murderers be prosecuted? Sure - in a world where justice and the rule of law matter for everyone equally. Doesn’t feel like we live in that world.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

If murderers got prosecuted equally this CEO should have had a day in court years ago.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Do you want to see the people who killed Osama Bin Laden prosecuted?
Because the United Heath CEO killed far more people, including many more children, than Bin Laden did on 9/11.

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

If he gets caught, then I'd say yes. Murder should be treated as murder regardless of what the reason is. Making exceptions is never a good idea.

I just hope he doesn't get caught.

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Then all of the healthcare companies that allow people to die because they will not cover them need to be prosecuted, every executive, every decision maker.

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Don't threaten me with a good time.

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Trinity: what is he doing?

Morpheus: he's beginning to believe..

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Exactly. :)

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

Yes, I do.

I want the state to make it crystal clear that this guy was the shooter. That he did it. That he had no legal justification to do it. That his actions were undeniably criminal, and that his crime was clearly premeditated.

And then I want a jury of his peers to return a "not guilty" verdict, and every scumbag business executive across the country suddenly deciding to take an early retirement.

His jury can't return that not guilty verdict if he isn't prosecuted.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

An answer to a different question, but if he gets caught I hope that the media gives him the same treatment as school shooters; plastering his image everywhere, distributing his manifesto and transforming him into an antihero.

Update: It's happening!

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

yes, of course. and found not guilty, to send a message.

[-] Poots@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Why is violence legal when the government does it but not for regular people who have exhausted their peaceful options? Escalation of force gets justified all the time for cops and waging wars.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Jury selection question to weed out biased jurors: "Have you ever had a claim that was unfairly denied?"

Weeks later: "We have been unable to find enough jurors to try the case."

[-] Zier@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

Sometimes people provide a public service to humanity is very dark ways. Do not turn this guy in.

[-] mke_geek@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

The murderer of that innocent man needs to be brought to justice.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago

You mean the man who's company let sick people die by denying proper healthcare, all for the sake of profits? That innocent man? Do not turn this guy in.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 3 months ago

Do you say this when people die as result of his profit seeking?

[-] mke_geek@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Do people who work at any company and get murdered should have their killers celebrated? It's the same thing.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe get a fine for .0005% of their net worth. You know, so they don’t do it again.

That’s how it works, right?

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Even if he's caught. Dudes going to get off if he demands a Jury trial. Not a single middle class or poor individual in America has a positive relationship with health insurance. Hell how does a prosecutor even screen jurors for this type of trial?

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago
[-] Earflap@reddthat.com 0 points 3 months ago

Prosecuted? Yes. Convicted? No.

[-] Aermis@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Do you even know what those words mean? Why do you even want a legal hearing when this was a clear case murder. He'll be convicted for murder. Because that's what happened. And the law is rigid in that.

I think you meant you want to see no sentencing. That's up to the courts. But there's no way he isn't guilty of murder. The only reason we're all up in arms saying "good" is because the person who was murdered may have quite frankly deserved it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

How do we get him to do it again?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shikitohno@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

No, because I don't see any point to it. If they manage to catch him, they may as well just kill him on the spot when they get him, as I have no faith that his trial would be anything more than a farce to try and present some sense of following process and norms, while guaranteeing he gets some insane sentence, only to be found mysteriously to have hung himself. I'm sure that, somehow, a jury of his peers will be comprised solely of the 12 most ghoulish residents of NYC one could find, and they'll probably try to shop around for the worst judge they can to hear the whole thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

Yes, of course

I don't want to live in a world of vigilantes, we don't want Batman, we don't want to need batman either

So having said that, CEO's should also be jailed for deaths they cause. If you cause a dozen deaths through purposeful decisions, you usually wouid get the chair so for this particular CEO would need a LOT of chairs to kill him a thousand times.

It's time to stop treating killings by man as a heavy crime and killings by a company as a misdemeanor

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Vigilante Justice in this case seems a lot better than police justice. How many people do cops murder in cold blood each year?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Liberals: the justice system is corrupt so it is good Hunter Biden got a pardon

Also Liberals: this guy should be prosecuted

[-] annHowe@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's almost as if liberals aren't the monolithic entity that you thought they were. It might be possible that they are a group of diverse individuals with differing opinions.

*Edit: I see you quietly edited your comment after I made my comment. Classic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] camelbeard@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Yes because killing people is wrong.

Look the CEO probably deserved to get shot, but a society can't function without some basic rules, like killing is bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

No. If murdering cops can get away with it, so should someone who killed a guy who has indirectly killed millions through the racket that is health insurance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] davidfield@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

For the social agreement society has, it's irrelevant if you think this person is a hero or a villain, they need to be tried by a jury of their peers in a court of law.

If they are not, then the social agreement that we don't go around murdering people, no matter the intent changes and life becomes very difficult.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

That social agreement had been broken long ago by the elites like the one recently targeted. It's funny that only now when someone finally responds in kind that it is suddenly so important.

[-] Earflap@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago

Don't call them that. They're just assholes with too much money.

I call them the billionaire class. It has the added bonus that it makes it painfully obvious to suburbanites that they aren't part of the club.

[-] viking@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago

Yes. An unsanctioned killing is murder, no matter what.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
5 points (85.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

38321 readers
595 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS