17
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 2 months ago

Entropy increase, mostly.

[-] andrew_s@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

Heretic (the one with Hugh Grant in it). I'm not sure any of it stands up to much scrutiny after watching, but it's an enjoyable watch when it's happening.
I'm halfway through Black Doves. It's recognisably a Joe Barton affair (the last thing I saw of his was The Lazarus Project, and BD has the same character archetypes, and the same strangely old cars).
The latest episode of Silo. Continues to be slow-paced, and stupid at times. Like the book, it feels like Young Adult stuff masquerading as something mainstream, but I've said that in the past, and been strongly disagreed with.

[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Started black doves on Netflix.

  • its not bad trying to get past episode 4

Finished The Jackal series

  • feels like they sacrificed a good ending for a season 2 plot
[-] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Currently, the Flintstones on Cartoon Network. Last night Ancient Aliens on History channel.

[-] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Bill & Ted Face the Music (2020)

Not great, but not bad for something to half-pay attention to.

[-] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I started watching a cute little Romance anime called Horimiya. The main characters are actually not complete idiots and don't take 2 seasons to get together.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 months ago

im to embarrased to say.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

What We Do In The Shadows. Last season! So hilarious. I have watched the Baron's night out episode like twenty times and every time it's as funny.

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Been watching Suits. Almost through season 7.

[-] stinky@redlemmy.com 1 points 2 months ago

Kevin Can F*ck Himself on Netflix.

There's a great twist in the first episode which makes your head spin, it's fun like a rollercoaster.

As the series goes on it gets darker and darker. I don't know how to post spoilers (never got them to work on Lemmy) but I'd love to talk about abusive relationships here

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)

Casual Conversation

2633 readers
421 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS