94
This was the obvious outcome. Those DEI jobs are pure bullshit. Downvote me if you feel like it, but they’re counterproductive.
DEI jobs were just marketing. It's the same sort of performative marketing seen during LGBTQ+ Month. Companies put rainbows on everything for a month, and then go back to business as usual the following month. DEI jobs were the same, while society was focused on diversity, companies hired someone to be the public face of "look at us, we care!" With less media focus on it and with budgets tightening, that wing of marketing is being axed. The companies don't care now, didn't care then and won't care in the future. It's all about the money.
100%. We had one at my company before 2020 and the hiring somehow got less diverse after they were brought in.
Same shit, different decade. They'll pretend for long enough for the public to outrage over something else, and nothing is done to truly serve liberation. Just a couple horseshit sinecurial spaces with fancy titles that will inevitably be filled by the same gentrifiers as the old ones within five years. It's not really a surprise anymore, just a disappointed facerub and a sigh.
Idk. I'm no longer convinced any of this can be solved without the entire community uprooting and disassociating from America as we know it in pursuit of our own self-determination; much as a pipe dream as that is. NFAC might've had a lot wrong, but they at least had the need for self-determination 100% spot on.
Yep. The answer is a cultural shift.
What does DEI mean?
Conservstices: Designated Ethnic Invertebrates
Everyone else: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.
Thanks, hard to keep up with all these new acryonyms lol.
I was pretty sure about the diversity from the context but had to look it up for the other two.
hard to keep up with all these new acryonyms
Especially the ones from foreign countries.
Affirmative action was banned because it was found to disadvantage Asian people, especially the Hmong, Laotian and other SEA people who are not stereotyped as "good at math". On average an Asian applicant needs a SAT score 250 points higher than a Black applicant to have the same chance to be admitted under affirmative action.
Edit: did some further reading on the subject since then, apparently it's so bad that experts (college admissions counselors) actively encourage Asian applicants to hide their race to get better chances of admission. Also it is not unknown for darker-skinned Asians to simply declare their race as Black.
I agree with all of what you said but the article isn't really about AA.
Because they are worthless roles that companies spend money on to cover their asses.
So like HR pretending to care about minorities?
Usually driven by the cunts at the top, not by HR. Performative bullshit.
Yeah pretty much
"... filled mostly by white people"
Yeah. And? What kind of racist bullshit is this?
On the one side, it's nice if the demographics match society at large, which these do.
On the other, we white people are on the whole underqualified to understand the needs of minority communities and how we can be more inclusive. Lived experience is an important part of being effective in these roles.
Given that, it's surprising that so many white people qualify. Perhaps they went above and beyond to study and dedicate themselves to overcoming the lack of experience. If so, good for them! Is amazing they care so much about this cause. But is that really the most likely scenario?
white people are on the whole under qualified to understand
This is complete false. If these type of positions even try to pretend to be anything other than a token gesture by the marketing department have some kind of training and certification and possibly even a degree behind them that quantifies whatever they are trying to teach. That means exams and reports and presentations. That means reading textbooks and doing research. So someone saying that the color of one's skin makes them innately better at taking a DEI-related exam and being a better DEI worker is about as racist as you can get.
If someone said that the color of one's skin would dictate if they could solve a partial differential equation, or the sex organs they have between their legs determined whether they could design a 5 story building, then they'd be called sexists or racist. Claiming that a white person automagically can't be disadvantaged and/or can't be as good in a DEI curriculum or work position is incredibly racist.
Companies like X/Twitter, Amazon and Applebees have
Et tu, Applebee's?
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
94 points (91.2% liked)
News
23664 readers
2577 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS