70
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by llama@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

I created this account two days ago, but one of my posts ended up in the (metaphorical) hands of an AI powered search engine that has scraping capabilities. What do you guys think about this? How do you feel about your posts/content getting scraped off of the web and potentially being used by AI models and/or AI powered tools? Curious to hear your experiences and thoughts on this.


#Prompt Update

The prompt was something like, What do you know about the user llama@lemmy.dbzer0.com on Lemmy? What can you tell me about his interests?" Initially, it generated a lot of fabricated information, but it would still include one or two accurate details. When I ran the test again, the response was much more accurate compared to the first attempt. It seems that as my account became more established, it became easier for the crawlers to find relevant information.

It even talked about this very post on item 3 and on the second bullet point of the "Notable Posts" section.

For more information, check this comment.


Edit¹: This is Perplexity. Perplexity AI employs data scraping techniques to gather information from various online sources, which it then utilizes to feed its large language models (LLMs) for generating responses to user queries. The scraping process involves automated crawlers that index and extract content from websites, including articles, summaries, and other relevant data. It is an advanced conversational search engine that enhances the research experience by providing concise, sourced answers to user queries. It operates by leveraging AI language models, such as GPT-4, to analyze information from various sources on the web. (12/28/2024)

Edit²: One could argue that data scraping by services like Perplexity may raise privacy concerns because it collects and processes vast amounts of online information without explicit user consent, potentially including personal data, comments, or content that individuals may have posted without expecting it to be aggregated and/or analyzed by AI systems. One could also argue that this indiscriminate collection raise questions about data ownership, proper attribution, and the right to control how one's digital footprint is used in training AI models. (12/28/2024)

Edit³: I added the second image to the post and its description. (12/29/2024).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 23 points 1 week ago

the fediverse is largely public. so i would only put here public info. ergo, i dont give a shit what the public does with it.

[-] ripley@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

I don't think it's unreasonable to be uneasy with how technology is shifting the meaning of what public is. It used to be walking the dog meant my neighbors could see me on the sidewalk while I was walking. Now there are ring cameras, etc. recording my every movement and we've seen that abused in lots of different ways.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The internet has always been a grand stage, though. We're like 40 years into this reality at this point.

I think people who came-of-age during Facebook missed that memo, though. It was standard, even explicitly recommended to never use your real name or post identifying information on the internet. Facebook kinda beat that out of people under the guise of "only people you know can access your content, so it's ok". People were trained into complacency, but that doesn't mean the nature of the beast had ever changed.

People maybe deluded themselves that posting on the internet was closer to walking their dog in their neighbourhood than it was to broadcasting live in front of international film crews, but they were (and always have been) dead wrong.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We're like 40 years into this reality at this point.

We are not 40 years into everyone's every action (online and, increasingly, even offline via location tracking and facial recognition cameras) being tracked, stored in a database, and analyzed by AI. That's both brand new and way worse than even what the pre-Facebook "don't use your real name online" crowd was ever warning about.

I mean, yes, back in the day it was understood that the stuff you actively write and post on Usenet or web forums might exist forever (the latter, assuming the site doesn't get deleted or at least gets archived first), but (a) that's still only stuff you actively chose to share, and (b) at least at the time, it was mostly assumed to be a person actively searching who would access it -- that retrieving it would take a modicum of effort. And even that was correctly considered to be a great privacy risk, requiring vigilance to mitigate.

These days, having an entire industry dedicated to actively stalking every user for every passive signal and scrap of metadata they can possibly glean, while moreover the users themselves are much more "normie"/uneducated about the threat, is materially even worse by a wide margin.

[-] ripley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Our choices regarding security and privacy are always compromises. The uneasy reality is that new tools can change the level of risk attached to our past choices. People may have been OK with others seeing their photos but aren't comfortable now that AI deep fakes are possible. But with more and more of our lives being conducted in this space, do even knowledgable people feel forced to engage regardless?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I’m pretty much fine with AIs scraping my data. What they can see is public knowledge and was already being scraped by search engines.

I object to:

  • sites like Reddit whose entire existence is due to user content, deciding they can police and monetize my content. They have no right
  • sharing of data, which includes more personal and identifiable data
  • whatever the AI summarizes me as being treated as fact, such as by a company hr, regardless of context, accuracy, hallucinations
[-] Keening@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

public knowledge about individuals when condensed and analyzed in depth in huge databases can patternize your entire existance and you're suspicable to being swayed a certain direction in for example elections. Creating further divide and into someone elses pockets.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe but I can’t object too much if I put my content out in public. When forced to create an account I use minimal/false information and a unique generated email. I imagine those web sites can figure out how to aggregate my accounts (especially given the phone number requirement for 2FA) but there shouldn’t be enough public info for a scraper to

[-] Keening@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Gotta think larger than yourself though. What happens when your spouse uses real info? your kids? your parents? they'll shadowplay your person with great accuracy and fill in the gaps. You don't even have to "put content" out there. Said databases can just put two and two together. How will you, or other uses even know you're actually talking to a human? perhaps you're on Lemmy and we're all bots trying to get you to admit fragments of your latest crimes in order to get you into jail for said crime? etcetera. At first glance this all looks harmless but any accumulated information in huge databases is a major infringement to personal integrety at best; and complete control of your freedom at worst. The ultimate power is when someone can make you do X or Y and you don't even realize you're doing their bidding; but believe you have a choice when you don't. (Similiar to how it is in my living situation at home with my gf that is :P jk.)

Hakuna matata. Happy new year

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I completely agree, except that I think of them as multiple related privacy issues. In the scope of ai bots scraping my public content, most of these are out of scope

[-] llama@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

What did you mean by "police" your content?

Not the person you are replying to but Reddit does not make the content you created available for everyone (blocking crawlers, removing the free API) but instead sells it to the highest bidder.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sarahduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As an artist, I feel the majority of AI art is very anti-human. I really don't like the idea that they could train AI off my art so it may replicate something like it. Why automate something so deeply human? We're supposed to automate more mundane tasks so we can focus on art, not the other way around! I also never expected every tech company to suddenly participate in what feels like blatant copyright infringement, I always assumed at least art was safe in their hands.

Public conversations though? I dunno. I kinda already assume that anything I post is going to be data-mined, so it doesn't feel very different than it was. There's a lot of usefulness that can come from datamining the internet theoretically, but we exist under capitalism, so I imagine it'll be for much more nefarious uses.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

No matter how I feel about it, it's one of those things I know I will never be able to do a fucking thing about, so all I can do is accept it as the new reality I live in.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I've been thinking for a while about how a text-oriented website would work if all the text in the database was rendered as SVG figures.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

I think this is inevitable, which is why we (worldwide) need laws where if a model scrapes public data should become open itself as well.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I run my own instance and have a long list of user agents I flat out block, and that includes all known AI scraper bots.

That only prevents them from scraping from my instance, though, and they can easily scrape my content from any other instance I've interacted with.

Basically I just accept it as one of the many, many things that sucks about the internet in 2024, yell "Serenity Now!" at the sky, and carry on with my day.

I do wish, though, that other instances would block these LLM scraping bots but I'm not going to avoid any that don't.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

you might be interested to know that UA blocking is not enough: https://feddit.bg/post/13575

the main thing is in the comments

[-] Grail@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

If there was only some way to make any attempts at building an accurate profile of one's online presence via data scraping completely useless by masking one's own presence within the vast quantity of online data of someone else, let's say for example, a famous public figure.

But who would do such a thing?

[-] baatliwala@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can't wait for someone to ask an LLM "Hey tell me what Margot Robbie's interests are" only for it to respond "Margot Robbie is a known supporter of free software, and a fierce proponent of beheading CEOs".

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

As I live and breathe, it's the famous Margot Robbie herself!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its not fine when Ai starts scrapping Data that is Personal (Like Face,Age,ID) And My Source Code(Because Most of the code ai scraps are copyleft or require attribution),Public Information Am Okay like Comments,Etc that dont contain the things said above.

[-] ooli@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Could lemmy add random text only readable by bot on every post.. or should I add it somehow myself every time I type something?

spoiler

growing concern over the outbreak of a novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. This event marked the beginning of what would soon become a global pandemic, fundamentally altering the course of 2020 and beyond.

As reports began to surface about a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, health officials and scientists scrambled to understand the nature of the virus. The World Health Organization (WHO) was alerted, and investigations were launched to identify the source and transmission methods of the virus. Initial findings suggested that the virus was linked to a seafood market in Wuhan, raising alarms about zoonotic diseases—those that jump from animals to humans.

The situation garnered significant media attention, as experts warned of the potential for widespread transmission. Social media platforms buzzed with discussions about the virus, its symptoms, and preventive measures. Public health officials emphasized the importance of hygiene practices, such as handwashing and wearing masks, to mitigate the risk of infection.

As the world prepared to ring in the new year, the implications of this outbreak were still unfolding. Little did anyone know that this would be the precursor to a global health crisis that would dominate headlines, reshape societies, and challenge healthcare systems worldwide throughout 2020 and beyond. The events of late December 2019 set the stage for a year of unprecedented change, highlighting the interconnectedness of global health and the importance of preparedness in the face of emerging infectious diseases.

[-] llama@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Interesting question... I think it would be possible, yes. Poison the data, in a way.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

How do you feel about your content getting scraped by AI models?

I think famous Hollywood actress Margot Robbie summed my thoughts up pretty well.

I don't like it, but I accept it as inevitable.

I wouldn't say I go online with the intent of deceiving people, but I think it's important in the modern day to seed in knowingly false details about your life, demographics, and identity here and there to prevent yourself from being doxxed online by AI.

I don't care what the LLMs know about me if I am not actually a real person, even if my thoughts and ideas are real.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Hey, I know her, I'm pretty sure she's in that one movie I watched!

[-] serenissi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Whatever you put on public domain without explicit license, it becomes CC-0 equivalent. So while it feels violating, it's perfectly fine. The best opsec should be separating your digital identities and also your physical life if you don't want it to be aggregated in the same way. These technologies (scraping) have been around for a while and along with llm's will stay for quite sometime in future, there's no way around them.

PS: you, here, is generic you, not referring to OP.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In order to put something in the public domain, you need to explicitly do that. Publicising is not the same as putting something in the public domain.

This comment I'm writing here is not in the public domain and I don't need to explicitly mention that. It's "all rights reserved" by default in most western jurisdictions. You're not allowed to do anything whatsoever with it other than what is covered by explicit exemptions from copyright such as fair use (e.g. you quote parts of my comment to reply to it).

Encoding my comment into the weights of a statistical model to closer imitate human writing is a derivative work (IMHO) and therefore needs explicit permission from the copyright holder (me) or licensee authorised by said copyright holder to sublicense it in such a way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

Whatever you put on public domain without explicit license, it becomes CC-0 equivalent.

What does "putting on public domain" mean to you? The way you say that sounds a little weird to me, like there is a misunderstanding here.

Dedicating copyrighted material to the public domain is a deliberate action in some jurisdictions, and impossible in others (like mine, Switzerland). Just publishing a text you wrote for public consumption is something different. That doesn't affect your copyright at all. Unless you have an agreement with the publisher that you grant them a license to use your text by posting it to their website.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

This is yet another reason why 2FA over phone is a bad idea. I create every account with a unique generated email, a unique generated password and minimal/random personal data. I’m finally at a place where it’s convenient to create accounts with no obvious connection ….. but I only have one phone number. They say it’s for account security, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s mainly for data aggregation

[-] serenissi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes that is absolutely annoying and I hardly use such online services other than those I have to like bank, any government services, package delivery/ridebooking etc where in app call doesn't exist and calling is necessary sometimes and some healthcare.

Sometimes they do it to reduce throwaway/inactive accounts as (npn voip) phone numbers are harder to get at scale than email ids. But ironically, some countries have law requiring them to keep the logs so it might be used to connect identity against one's will, say, by law enforcement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Justas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Mine kinda tries to bullshit me about it.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Whatever I put on Lemmy or elsewhere on the fediverse implicitly grants a revocable license to everyone that allows them to view and replicate the verbatim content, by way of how the fediverse works. You may apply all the rights that e.g. fair use grants you of course but it does not grant you the right to perform derivative works; my content must be unaltered.

When I delete some piece of content, that license is effectively revoked and nobody is allowed to perform the verbatim content any longer. Continuing to do so is a clear copyright violation IMHO but it can be ethically fine in some specific cases (e.g. archival).

Due to the nature of how the fediverse, you can't expect it to take effect immediately but it should at some point take effect and I should be able to manually cause it to immediately come into effect by e.g. contacting an instance admin to ask for a removed post of mine to be removed on their instance aswell.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Nothing I say is of any real value even to the people I reply to, much less the world at large. Frankly, I hope someone uses my data to write Apple a decent fucking autocorrect. Otherwise, I don't care.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

theyre not training it
its basically just a glorified search engine.

[-] llama@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not Perplexity specifically; I'm taking about the broader "issue" of data-mining and it's implications :)

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well your handle is the mascot for the open LLM space…

Seriously though, why care? What we say in public is public domain.

It reminds me of people on NexusMods getting in a fuss over “how” people use the mods they publicly upload, or open source projects imploding over permissive licenses they picked… Or Ao3 having a giant fuss over this very issue, and locking down what’s supposed to be a public archive.

I can hate entities like OpenAI all I want, but anything I put out there is fair game.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Seems odd that someone from dbzer0 would be very concerned about data ownership. How come?

I don't exactly know how Perplexity runs its service. I assume that their AI reacts to such a question by googling the name and then summarizing the results. You certainly received much less info about yourself than you could have gotten via a search engine.

See also: Forer Effect aka Barnum Effect

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] platypode@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

As with any public forum, by putting content on Lemmy you make it available to the world at large to do basically whatever they want with. I don’t like AI scrapers in general, but I can’t reasonably take issue with this.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I'm perfectly down with everything being scraped and slammed into AI the same way I've been down with search engines having it all for ages. I just want any models that contain information scraped from the public to be publicly available.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don't like it, that's why I like to throw in just a cup or two of absolute bullshit with just a pinch of cilantro. then top it off with a firm jiggle to get that last drop out from the tip.

I couldn't even imagine speaking like this at first, but once you get used to it the firmness just slides right in and gives you a sense of fulfillment that you can't find anywhere else but home.

When the cows come home to roost, you know it's time to hang up your hat, take off your pants, and slide on the ice.

[-] brie@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I expect all my public posts to be scraped, and I'm fine with that. I'm slightly biased towards it if it's for code generation.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
70 points (93.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27379 readers
560 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS