Meanwhile, Disenchantment seemed like it was written episode by episode. I guess it all tied up in the end, but I didn't care about 90+ percent of the arcs, so the whole series felt half-baked to me. I enjoyed it, but something felt off, by miles.
They made up for that with sexy Dagmar. And Merkimer..
I may be some sort of weirdo but Oona should be considered.
Seconded
People like you give me hope. I really, really vibe with a grown woman slurping down drugs and pace-screaming in her garden.
And of course, piracy.
I'll allow it. Honestly her "or is?" Is so great, but nobody gets it and they give me weird looks.
I'm glad you mentioned it. I had a whole rant about how we cheer for Fry, because he's stupid and means well, and we despise Elfo, because he's an underhanded little prick.
Tangent! ;)
We stopped watching it when Netflix pulled their no families bullshit
Did it all tie up? The whole steamland plotline got dropped completely by the end and that was basically half the show's worth of plot.
Yeah, "tied up" just means it had an ending. I'm not sure I really even understood what really happened in that show. It felt like a new arc started before the previous was halfway through and then different subtle parts of previous arcs sorta mattered for the current, but not in any meaningful way.
The only constant was that Magdar would show up at the last and first episodes of the season with a new random evil plan.
The whole thing was such a mess.
Very different show runners.
Disenchantment's plot felt like a D&D campaign where the DM winged it every week.
There's a reason why most D&D campaigns aren't adapted into TV shows
IIRC Nibbler's shadow was in the storyboard for the pilot. Shown on the DVD extras
tl;dw?
tl;dr
This person saw the shadow on a pre-release promotional tape of the episode, so the answer is probably a yes.
Tl;dr?
Nibbler
Tap for spoiler
The shadow is there
Instead of a half-hour video, it could have been a single word.
Strong agree
it could have been, but then it'd just be some guy claiming it was there without presenting the evidence, and it wouldn't have settled the debate at all.
People prefer succinct bullshit over the truth. That's why the world is the way it is today.
Aliens!
Or the number of times I've heard that Chinese drones are flying over New Jersey recently is baffling. One guy was telling me they were probably trying to scope out property to buy up.
Much cheaper to get a realtor or check the satellite views on Google Maps/Earth if you ask me.
They could at least have led with it, but then I guess it wouldn't be clickbait.
Yes.
They did a minor retcon later. The scene is shown again and as well as the original shadow (And nibbler's eye in the bin), you see Fry's shadow too, since he time travels back there in the Why of Fry. Unfortunately I can't remember which episode this is in at the minute
Jurassic Bark.
And for reference, the pilot,
Nice! Clearly I blocked it out because of the trauma of the ending
Answer: yes. It was there.
I thought this was well known? Or an I just a nerd for checking myself many years ago?
The issue was that the only way to know for sure was to watch a recording of the original airing, the episode could have been modified in reruns.
Oldest mystery? Just watch the fucking episode
Thats the whole point, it was said they made chabges for physical copies and reairing to close the plot hole.
Its a bit over the top but it seems to actually close an ongoing discussion.
That is the point of the video. There were already known differences between the pre-release pilot and the one that actually aired on TV.
So, was the Nibbler-Fry plotline part of the first episode, or was it added later?
Yeah go back and watch older South park episodes and look at how they changed Token's name to Tolkien all to make a joke about Cartman being racist.
For all things Futurama
Rule 1: Don't be a jerkwad!
Rule 2: Alternate video links to be linked in a comment, below the original video.
Related Communities