377
Lecture rule (slrpnk.net)
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Jordan Peterson is a hack philosopher who barely understands the source material he critiques. He does not understand Marx’s historical materialism in the slightest; his lectures on Christianity are more rambles than coherent points; and his claim to fame is getting upset over pronouns and riding that pony to the money train that is the alt-right pipeline. If you actually know these topics, it’s plain to see how shallow Peterson’s opinions and viewpoints are. He’s a great con-man—I’ll give him that.

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

He's very good at saying nothing in so many words and then claiming something that doesn't follow from what he said.

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 10 points 2 months ago

He once told a friend he wanted to buy an old church. Puzzled, his friend asked what for, assuming he meant to live in like some weird rich recluse might do. Nope. He wanted to buy it so he could give sermons to people about his ideologies.

If only he just did that instead of existing publicly 😒

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

That guy still eating only meat or have his arteries fully clogged up yet?

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Probably, since he claims it is for some weird disease.

Unless you count all the nutritious pills he needs to swallow to be even slightly healthy.

Except for all the brain damage he suffered through his benzos addiction, that shit is irreversible.

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
377 points (98.5% liked)

196

17448 readers
1200 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS