talking to the liberals on .world about the yougov poll saying that they lost because of the genocide has me feeling like the climate scientists who said that the people would naturally come to the same conclusion if you show them the proof and they'll change their ways accordingly. 🤦

Turns out it's not a winning strategy to tell people they have to solemnly vote for genocide, then make fun of them for protesting genocide

I argued with a few .world libs about how a political party had convinced them that genocide was not only acceptable, but defendable as well.

I told them that they were going to vote for genocide, and still lose. I told them they would never be clean again.

All they told me was "lesser of two evils", and "trans genocide", despite the very real shrapnel-ridden and charred child corpses they were seeing, in real time.

Now they get to live as losers three times over. The election, their stance on genocide, and we all lost when trump was elected. I know that losing the election and trump winning may be argued as a single point, but I see just the Harris loss as one point, and trump being elected a significant enough of an event as to be considered it's own point.

We'll get to sit and watch when the dems learn nothing from the Harris failures, and the problems from 2016, as they rig their own primaries again for 2028. At least then Harris will be right about nothing fundamentally changing.

I could see myself covering my ears somewhere and it looking really bad but just because it's too loud!

~~Deal~~ Bi-partisan compromise to make progress with the devil.

What do you mean we got nothing just like always!

Did anyone ever find out the names of these people? For posterity, of course