120
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ordellrb@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Millions of pictures of Dogs on the Internet but this thing... I reconice immediately

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 months ago

I was just thinking about this right after posting it. Any other husky would look the same to me, but I somehow immediately know this is The Thing.

[-] Tai@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

I fear no man... but that thing...

[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

I don't get the part about tags by @lwgionofpotatoes

Oh, I can explain. On tumblr, tags are usually just visible if you look at one person's particular reblogging of a post, so if you want to highlight specific tags while also crediting the person who made them, you have to either screenshot them or quote them with attribution, which is what was done here.

Yes, it's a pretty bad design, but that's tumblr for ya.

[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So is the whole thing a tag? #listen. You know I'm always down... ? It's one tag?

Yes, the whole thing is a tag. On tumblr you have a lot of useful tags such as #anarchism or whatever, but people also put whatever thoughts they have in the tags.

[-] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Another day of tumblr users being unfunny and incomprehensible

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Another day of people not getting a reference calling the people that do get the reference "unfunny and incomprehensible" instead of saying nothing and moving on with their lives.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 3 months ago

The horrors are beyond their comprehension

[-] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

I's literally just an image of a husky in snow, even if I would watch a movie from over 40 years ago I might not recognize it here. Not incomprehensible maybe but unfunny anyway

[-] mossy_@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

this appears to be a frame from the movie The Thing

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Lmao, I assumed it was a furry thing.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 months ago
[-] altasshet@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago
[-] shani66@ani.social 2 points 3 months ago

I haven't even watched the thing and i get it. Whatever rock you live under is dangerously large and you some vacate the area immediately.

[-] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I'm maybe just not 50+ years old like the rest of the userbase lol

[-] accideath@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Do you think people only watch films that are younger than themselves?

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

people generally watch more new films than old films, yes

[-] accideath@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

But not solely. I don’t know anyone who hasn’t seen at least a few films that are older than them. And if you haven’t, you really should, there are some amazing timeless classics from the 70s, 80s, 90s, etc. out there. Even some that are close to 100 years old.

this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
120 points (95.5% liked)

196

17508 readers
378 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS