22
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by Erika3sis@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Edit: Moving article link to post body to keep video from autoplaying. https://www.dagbladet.no/video/vil-ha-russisk-militaerbase-pa-svalbard/30bFSKjD

GURULYOV: The events of the past few days have been, if not quick— we have to admit that a war in the Arctic has already begun in fact. We have talked about this many times here, and I've always seen the Arctic threat as one of the greatest.

NARRATOR: On January 13th, during a broadcast^[According to The Barents Observer, the program was Evening with Vladimir Solovyov, a socio-political talk show.] by Russian TV channel Rossiya 1, member of the State Duma Committee on Defense Andrei Gurulyov said that Russia should establish a military base on Svalbard. He stated that this would strengthen Russia's strategic position in the Arctic and secure the country's interests in the region.

GURULYOV: Svalbard is today extremely important for us, it's right next to our Northern Fleet. I think we need to go from joint development to purely Russian solutions. We can have very good bases there to influence the whole Arctic region which exists today.

NARRATOR: These proposals violate the Svalbard Treaty, which forbids military activity on the island^[This is a very peculiar phrasing by a bourgeois Norwegian source, given that the whole source of the Svalbard conflict is precisely that Norway interprets the Svalbard Treaty as permitting military activity on the archipelago. What the treaty forbids as such is the use of the archipelago for "warlike purposes", and the construction of military bases there: Norway maintains that it has a right to a military presence on the archipelago, since Svalbard is Norway's sovereign territory and Norway accordingly has a natural right and need to defend it; Russia on the contrary holds that any military presence on the archipelago is warlike.]. Russia's ambassador to Norway, Nikolai Korchunov, said to Dagbladet that proposals and opinions from individual Russian politicians do not necessarily reflect the government's stances^[Gurulyov is apparently known for making statements (apparently specifically on Evening with Vladimir Solovyov) which are taken as inflammatory or bizarre, and which ultimately don't amount to anything but footnotes at the bottom of his Wikipedia article. A few Hexbears have discussed some of his previous remarks: in one, he stated that in the case of a Third World War, Russia would bomb London first, followed by Paris, Berlin, or Warsaw; in another, he apparently encouraged Russia to launch missile strikes against the UK to eradicate the Royal Family. In the same broadcast as his remarks on Svalbard, he also said, "Trump is declaring his claims to Greenland. Why shouldn't we look at Greenland? We need Greenland! This is not a joke. We absolutely need it! At the very least, we could make a deal with Trump and split Greenland into a couple of pieces. It is clear that Denmark will never be there again." (Barents Observer, Newsweek) — and he also said, "Today, we need to clearly increase the military component in the Arctic, based on the conditions that are taking place, including in Ukraine. We are only looking at Ukraine, aren't we? The Arctic is a second and larger issue that has already begun, and we need to sit down and clearly calculate everything. War, we've always said, is math. We have to sit down and do the math. The main thing is to build a proper defense there. We need to build such a defense that no one will think of sticking their heads into our what? The Arctic …" (Newsweek) — the theme of that week's episode of Vladimir Solovyov was apparently Trump Jr's visit to Greenland and its consequences.]. Korchunov denies that the establishment of military bases on Svalbard is anything under current serious discussion. He underlines that Russia's official Arctic policy revolves around preserving the region as a peaceful region for cooperation, in accordance with international law.

Translated transcription of the Russian Ambassador's e-mail to DagbladetThank you for your inquiry.

The following is a response from Russia's Ambassador Nikolai Korchunov:

Different opinions and proposals on matters of foreign and security policy are expressed in Russia also by parliamentarians, who sometimes contradict one another, but the determining voice has always been the President's as expressed in the documents on the Arctic that he has approved, among others Foundations of The Russian Federation's State Policy in the Arctic up to 2035 and Strategy for Development of the Russian Federation's Arctic Region up to 2035, which concern the need to preserve the Arctic as a peaceful region benefitting from mutual cooperation with Arctic states based in international law, also on Svalbard — on equally and mutually beneficial cooperative terms with Norway. These documents, which apply directly to all government institutions, including the Ministry of Defense, do not assume [a right/need to the?] establishment of military bases on the territory of other states in the region.

Kind regards,

Russia's Embassy in Norway


top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NewOldGuard@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago

Warmongering fuck trying to counter Trump’s expansionist arctic colonialism with his own. Good thing this guy is all rhetoric by the looks of things. But Jesus Christ there is no place for this reactionary hawkish mindset in a nuclear world, find another place for your arctic bases because every conflict with a “great” power brings us right up to the brink of hell.

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

news

24222 readers
722 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS