145
submitted 10 months ago by Alsephina@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

The tariffs would ensnare cutting-edge smartphone and PC-related chips for Apple, AMD and Nvidia if enacted. But Trump is betting his plan will bring more chip production to the US.

Archive link

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 99 points 10 months ago
[-] stink@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 10 months ago

Crying and banging my head on the floor because accelerationists might be right

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 18 points 10 months ago

ACCELERATIONIST TRUMP

ACCELERATIONIST TRUMP

[-] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 32 points 10 months ago
[-] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 24 points 10 months ago

"trump was godsent, but not for the reasons you believe. think more of an exodus' plague"

[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I don't know about God, but I do agree with the outcome.

There are, if memory serves, quite a few examples of God punishing his chosen people and redistributing their wealth. But then you've got that whole new testament thing which really pushes the idea that everyone is the chosen people now.

It seems to me that the only one trying to destroy the United States is the United States.

[-] 0x01@lemmy.ml 76 points 10 months ago

Ah yes put tariffs on the goods that our allies make, a tried and true solution to the problem of groceries

Long term, more high tech manufacturing will be the result of more technology availability for cheaper, not higher cost chips from overseas

It's my understanding that Taiwan doesn't manufacture the chip producing machines anyways, those come from ASML

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 28 points 10 months ago

This will surely sort out the egg price

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 10 months ago

He said he was gonna apply tarrifs to China. This is consistent with the One China policy.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 22 points 10 months ago

Yellow Perilism isn't just about PRC. Japan suffered from it first hand in the 1980s and 1990s. Anti-Asian racism runs deep in the US and the West.

[-] dawnglider@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Wait I somehow never thought about this, does the one china policy really dictates that they have to apply tariffs across the strait? I assume it's in jest since I'm pretty sure they regular import/export on a smaller scale yet (like ban on Xinjiang imports), but I'm curious

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 36 points 10 months ago

The world's largest semiconductor foundry, and one of the primary reasons the U.S. maintains a hold on Taiwan. There are rumours that the US has a plan to blow it up in case of Chinese invasion, that's how valuable it is. So this quite a reversal of strategy.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

As I understand it, TSMC and Taiwan themselves have a plan to blow up the foundries should a China invasion look like it's going to succeed. They are already rigged with the explosives from what I understand.

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

I have heard they are rigged with explosives, but that could just be hearsay. I wouldn't work in a building rigged with explosives. I also don't understand why TSMC would voluntarily self-destruct in such a situation. I don't get the incentive.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's removing "gaining control of TSMC" from the lists of reasons for China to invade, making the whole operation less attractive. Though the more the US tries to deny China access to advanced chips, the less that disincentive matters.

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Ohh. Hmm. It's far-fetched but I suppose it's plausible.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 26 points 10 months ago

Tariffs only exist to protect the profits of the ruling class.

Do not be fooled. Tariffs are not good for us.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago

Japan used tariffs to increase domestic industries and leap frog into the 20th century. It enabled them to take part in WW II and beyond. That's why you'll see giant corporations that control multiple different industries.

It did work for Japan. The US is in a completely different situation though, and it'll only hurt.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

The US also used protectionism in the 19th and 20th centuries

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago

You know it wasn't the same. And if you don't know that then you shouldn't even respond like that.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

You clearly know nothing

The United States pursued a protectionist policy from the beginning of the 19th century until the middle of the 20th century. Between 1861 and 1933, they had one of the highest average tariff rates on manufactured imports in the world. After 1942, the U.S. began to promote worldwide free trade. After the 2016 presidential election, the US increased trade protectionism.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_tariffs_in_the_United_States

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Has nothing to do with the current situation.

But "america bad" so you do you.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Has everything to do with the current situation.

"usa bad"

what else would you call enabling a genocide?

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There it is. ML user is a single issue voter, if they're even American to begin with .

You can't even distinguish between a century wide gap in economics and today.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Tariffs can help with preparation, and they are a tool like many other policies. These ones, though, are not thoughtfully planned out. These protect no one, not even the mega-corps who need to figure out how to make everything domestically or price themselves out of the market.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago

Not true. A nation doesn't need tariffs to help with preparations unless they're also trying to maintain the dominance of their ruling classes.

Tariffs mean we have to pay for it instead of them. They can afford it, but they won't foot the bill unless they are forced to.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I've found it soul crushing that anyone believed tariffs would help.

[-] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago

It Hurt Itself in Its Confusion!

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago

Does he plan to start making chips??? Genuinely why would he do this.

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

The US makes chips. Notably Intel and TSMC have US fabs.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Lol the chips Intel and TSMC make in the US are three generations old and no where near producing the amount needed to even cover the USs needs.

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 months ago

Intel is currently floundering unable to make a good (reliable) node. TSMC can make the chip, but the very important step of packaging needs to be done in Taiwan still.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Ahhhhh, so he's trying to reinvigorate domestic industry.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Yeah that's his thought process. The US isn't 19th century Japan though.

[-] sibachian@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

could be, if he also made education free. since he is currently reversing the global brain drain by deporting immigrants. i don't see what other next step he could possibly commit to unless he expects re-industrialization to just magically appear out of thin air.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Yes, we all know Trump wants to make education free lmao

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah, seems to be the carrot and stick approach. Biden provided the carrot a few years ago (subsidies for new US plants) and Trump is providing the stick (tariffs for offshore imports).

[-] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 10 months ago

The biggest issue being that despite having operational fabs here, TSMC still needs to ship their wafers to Taiwan in order to process them into chips.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago

And people said nothing good will come out of Trump :D Weakening the US' position internationally and its allies is a good thing in my opinon.

[-] Amir@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago

I see he adopted "death to America"

[-] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

Is he intentionally trying to sink us? If so, I guess I don't hate him as much as I thought?

Neo Hitler is getting strike 1 out of 3 out of the way

[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
145 points (99.3% liked)

World News

38510 readers
854 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS