106
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

This meme is almost a decade old now isn't it?

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

Biden's polling low, the voters want things do be different... huh, better campaign on doing nothing different! What? They're saying we're doing a genocide? Well, better point out that Trump is gonna do a worse genocide!

That'll be a great message, exactly the sort of thing that makes people excited to vote...

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

Yeah, because people should vote on excitement and engagement, not truth ... totally doesn't devolve a democratic process into one of reactionary populisms fueled by false promises. If people want to get excited, they should go to a theme park. If they have a shred of civil responsibility, they vote, specially when things were as bad as they were.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

because people should vote on excitement and engagement, not truth

What part of the genocide wasn't true at the time of the elections?

reactionary populisms fueled by false promises

Like codifying Roe V Wade? Like closing Guantanamo?

If they have a shred of civil responsibility

Civil responsibility is voting for the party that pretends to care about Gazans while carrying out a genocide and funding Israel.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

because people should vote on excitement and engagement, not truth

What part of the genocide wasn't true at the time of the elections?

reactionary populisms fueled by false promises

Like codifying Roe V Wade? Like closing Guantanamo?

If they have a shred of civil responsibility

Civil responsibility is voting for the party that pretends to care about Gazans while carrying out a genocide and funding Israel.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

Like not spamming the same comment multiple times and like realizing that the only but quite essential power you do have is choosing between the least worse candidate because the much worse candidate will go the complete autocrat route. I can't believe how brainwashed some people continue to be to try to argue they have not just doomed Gaza, helped expand Guantanamo Bay, or have endangered people's right while trying to use examples of how it could have been better as an "argument".

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -2 points 4 months ago

Literally ALL the things you've mentioned could have been fixed by democrats, and 2/3 were actually electoral promises... I dont know how you expect people to keep voting for the lesser evil if the lesser evil is a deceptive and genocidal party

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Because the alternative is much worse and arguments like yours are so far more deceptive that they are the Hail Mary of autocratic troll factories.

Just because you don't get the choices you want or should have does not mean you should throw it away, and if what Trump isn't proving that already, then you are either a dumbass or arguing in bad faith. People like you are far more responsible for Trump and as a consequence his actions than the voters you claim to hate.

It is perfectly possible to try to work to change a system from the outside that cannot be changed from the inside while trying to use whatever influence you have on the inside to prevent the worst aspects of it. Instead you choose play acting and then shaking off responsibility.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -3 points 4 months ago

Well you clearly see it doesn't work. Saying "there's someone worse* CLEARLY doesn't mobilise people to vote repeatedly against fascism. Almost as if, hear me out, fascism has never historically been beaten through electoralism. What we need is to organize in leftist communities and organisations, create dual power structures, protest hard and support labor rights, and struggle against fascism through direct action instead of voting once every four years.

Keep blaming the people who warned you that the democrat strategy of lesser-evilism wouldn't work.

[-] peregrin5@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

"Democrats didn't entertain me enough so I didn't vote."

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

OP mentions genocide

Response frames it as entertainment

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Since the Democrats didn't give every single thing on the bLuEmAGa screechers wishlist, ofc Trump was the perfect alternative!

Definitely not an example of letting perfection become the enemy of good or anything!

Edit: To whoever replied to me, but probably has me blocked since I can't see it (only the reply counter) unblock me if you're going to reply to me, coward!

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Uh, that means you blocked them.

[-] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Letting perfection become the enemy of good? Good is funding a genocide?

Also, I've never blocked anyone.

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Now we’re funding a genocide and making life worse for everyone else. Huzzah!

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
106 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

8511 readers
1280 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS